Full Judgment
25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 20.05.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12822 of 2011 with liberty to petitioner to renew her prayer, if her trial is not concluded within six months. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the trial of the petitioner is still pending and having similar allegation co-accused Shakuntala Devi has already been granted privilege of bail by this Court vide order dated 12.12.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40714 of 2011. Learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance opposed the prayer pointing out that up-till-now only half of the defalcated amount could be traced out. So, petitioner does not deserve the privilege of bail because she facilitated the main Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.857 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 accused to digest the defalcated amount. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance North Bihar, Muzaffarpur in connection with Special Case No. 27 of 2010 arising out of Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 401 of 2010 subject to condition that petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date in person for the period of one year and if she fails to do so on three consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.) SHAHZAD/-