Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Saurav Kumar Chandan Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2405 of 2012 ====================================================== Saurav Kumar Chandan .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 419, 420/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that one Amit Kumar was caught who was appearing in place of the petitioner at the examination of AIEEE. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has no knowledge about Amit Kumar appearing at the examination and moreover petitioner has not passed his Intermediate examination, hence there was no use of him appearing at the examination. Considering the fact that petitioner was not caught near examination centre and he is a student,...
Tag this Judgment!Yogendra Sharma and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.199 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.199 of 2011 ====================================================== 1.Yogendra Sharma , son of late Parsan Sharma 2. Nagendra Sharma, son of late Parsan Sharma 3. Vijay Kumar Sharma, son of Nagendra Sharma 4. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, son of Nagendra Sharma 5. Dhananjay Kumar Sharma, son of nagendra Sahrma, all are residents of Village- Dhaka Road, Mathia, P.S. Chhatauni, District-East Champaran.6. Prem Sharan Sharma, son of late Kewal Sharma, resident of Village- Suthash Nagar, Chhatauni Mathia, District- East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJ...
Tag this Judgment!Ritesh Kumar @ Hani Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1245 of 2012 Ritesh Kumar @ Hani Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 25.1.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition, as prayed for. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 27.6.2011 in a case registered under sections 396 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. One rickshaw puller was apprehended from the spot. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The petitioners name sprang up in the confessional statement of co accused. It is alleged that recovery of rupees one lac forty thousand has been made from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade. It is further submitted that other accused persons have been granted bail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petit...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2528 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2528 of 2012 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 143, 341, 504, 353 of the I.P.C. The accusation is of blocking NH-2 for about two hours. It is alleged that petitioner was leading the mob. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that protest was being made due to the abduction of a girl. Considering the general nature of accusation against the mob in the background of protest being made against abduction of a girl, let the petitioner namely Ashok Kumar Singh, in the event of h...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2938 of 2012 Sanjay Yadav, Son of Jag Mohan Yadav, resident of village Inarpatpur, P. S. Piro, District Bhojpur. ...... Peitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ...... Opp. Party. ---------------------------------- 02/ 25.01.2012 Heard. This is a petition for regular bail for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The First Information Report is against unknown and it is alleged that Rs.60,000/- was snatched by five persons. It is stated that only material against the petitioner in paragraph nos. 38, 39 and 44 of the case diary that the petitioner was seen going towards the occurrence and hence except the suspicion there is nothing against the petitioner. However, the petitioner has surrendered on 04.11.2011 and it is stated that no Test Identification Parade has been conducted. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on...
Tag this Judgment!Nagendra Bihari Saran and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.601 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.601 of 2011 ====================================================== Nagendra Bihari Saran & Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in this case dispute is with regard to transfer of land more than the share which the complainant has claimed in the complaint petition and for that title suit was also filed which ended into compromise. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and primarily it is a ...
Tag this Judgment!Arvind Singh @ Arbind Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2040 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2040 of 2012 ====================================================== Arvind Singh @ Arbind Kumar Singh .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The present application has been filed for modification of order dated 17.05.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14094 of 2011 for extending the period of surrender. Considering the grounds mentioned in the modification application, the period of surrender is extended for a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. The order dated 17.05.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14094 of 2011 stands modified to the extent as indicated above. Let the or...
Tag this Judgment!Suleman Ansari Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1214 of 2012 Suleman Ansari Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 25.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 6.12.2011 in a case registered under section 7 of the E.C. Act. It is alleged that 100 bags of IFFCO urea fertilizer were recovered from the petitioner and it was suspected that the petitioner was selling the same in black market. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is a fertilizer dealer and informant is not an authorized inspector under the Fertilizer Control Order, hence, lodging of the FIR is bad in law. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Bikramganj, Rohtas in Bikramganj P.S. Case no. 174 of 2011 . Anil/ (Dinesh Ku...
Tag this Judgment!Ganga Ram Chaurasia and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2574 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2574 of 2012 ====================================================== Ganga Ram Chaurasia & Anr. .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioners that they received Rs. 3,000/- and Rs. 2,000/- from the beneficiaries of Indira Awas Scheme. It is submitted that the petitioners are neither the sanctioning nor disbursing authority. Moreover, the payments ultimately have been made through respective account of the beneficiaries. F.I.R. has been lodged with ino...
Tag this Judgment!Upendra Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2895 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2895 of 2012 ====================================================== Upendra Kumar .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. J.P.Verma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. U.C.Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is a petition for regular bail for the offence under sections 341,323,376,379,406 and 511 of I.P.C. The allegation is that the petitioner caught hold the informant and tried to make illicit relation and then it is alleged that he tried to kill her and fled away with her ornaments. However, he was caught hold after one hour by the villagers. It...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »