Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramgulam Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.329 of 2012 ====================================================== Ramgulam Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 173 of 2011 registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani. It is alleged that the petitioner repeatedly gave dagger blow to the son of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the injury has been found to be simple which reflects the intention of the petitioner. In view of this Court, it is a fit case for considera...
Biranjay Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38101 of 2011 (3) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38101 of 2011 ====================================================== Biranjay Prasad, S/O-Late Kameshwar Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Taking into consideration that neither petitioner was caught at the spot nor the victim boys were recovered from his possession and the informant as well as other witnesses have claimed only to see the petitioner fleeing from the place of occurrence and moreover, petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent which is evident from letter ...
Md. ShyamuddIn Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1017 of 2012 Md. Shyamuddin Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 24.1.2012 Heard Mr. Jagdish Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.N. Pandit, learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 21.10.2011 in a case registered under sections 414, 420, 290, 120B and 272 of the Indian Penal Code and section 47(A) Excise Act. It is alleged that twenty thousand liters of spirit was recovered from the tanker. The petitioner was near the tanker in a Bolero car. It is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and other accused persons named in the FIR, have been released on bail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., East Champaran at Motihari in Mehasi P.S. Case no. 249 of 2...
Krantiveer Das @ Karantiveer Das Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2021 of 2012 ====================================================== Krantiveer Das @ Karantiveer Das .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Though, the accusation is of demand of dowry and torture but the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the stand of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of his arrest or surr...
Biltu Gope @ Rajesh Rai Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3259 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3259 of 2012 ====================================================== Biltu Gope @ Rajesh Rai, S/o Late Lolak Ray, resident of Jamaluddin Chak, P.S. Khagaul, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD 2 24-01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 79 of 2011, registered under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. However, from the possession of the petitioner only Rs. 15,000/- alleged to have been recovered. The petitioner is in custody since 08. 07. 2011. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of...
The State of Bihar and ors Vs. Suraj Mahto and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.136 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2961 of 2007 With Interlocutory Application No. 612 of 2011 With Interlocutory Application No. 613 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.136 of 2011 ====================================================== The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Appellants Versus Suraj Mahto & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. Prashant Kashyap, AC to AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3. 24-01-2012 In spite of the order dated 25th January 2011, notice to the respondent no.16 has not been issued by the Registry. Notice will be issued upon the respondent no.16 for hearing on limitation petition and for hearing and final disposal of the Appeal, to be made returnab...
Parikshan Ram and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3384 o1. Parikshan Ram, son of late Munni Lal Ram 2. Sanjay Ram, sonof Prikshan Ram, both residents of Bhisa Kariyahi Tola, P.S. Dumara, district Sitamarhi .. Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .. Opposite party **** /2/ 24 January, Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and 2012 the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under Section 307 and allied sections of the Penal Code. However, subsequently, Section 302 of the Penal Code was added on the death of the informant. There is allegation of assault for entering in the house by iron rod. However, the injury has been shown to be simple and the post mortem report suggests that the death is due to septicemia leading to C.R. failure due to infected wound on the person of the deceased. The petitioner is in jail since 05.11.2011. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on ba...
Ram Vilash Mandal Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2303 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2303 of 2012 ====================================================== Ram Vilash Mandal .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the P.D.S. dealer is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the petitioner under the scheme of Food for Work was supplied the grains but he did not give the account with regard to Rs. 7,00,000/-. It is submitted that without enquiry, F.I.R. was lodged. The petitioner is ready to return the amount with regard to grains which has actually not been distributed to the beneficiaries after p...
Rambilash Ram and anr Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39920 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Rambilash Ram S/o Mahnath Ram R/o Vill-Sonbarsha Gularbaga, Ps- G.B.Nagar,Distt-Siwan 2. Kailash Ram S/o Mahnath Ram R/o Vill-Sonbarsha Gularbaga, Ps- G.B.Nagar,Distt-Siwan .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this case of assault. Submission is, apart from others, plea of alibi and it is further submitted that counter version by way of Complaint Case no. 598 of 2011 the injuries sustained are...
Shailendra Bhagat Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39457 of 2011 Shailendra Bhagat Versus The State Of Bihar -------24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this court vide order dated 5.1.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 31076/2010 with specific direction to the lower court to expedite the trial of the petitioner. The learned trial court has reported that 6 prosecution witnesses including Medical officer have been examined and case is pending for evidence of the Investigating officer. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in charge sheet altogether 13 prosecution witnesses have been citied and seven prosecution witnesses are still left to be examined. Considering the aforesaid submission as well as report of the Ist Addl. Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi and also keeping nature of the allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not incl...