Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ram Vilash Mandal Vs. the State of Bihar

Ram Vilash Mandal vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974230

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Vilash Mandal

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.2303 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2303 of 2012 ====================================================== ram vilash mandal .... .... petitioner. versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”24. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner being the p.d.s. dealer is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under section 409 of the indian penal code. the accusation is that the petitioner under the scheme of food for work was supplied the grains but he did not give the account with regard to rs. 7,00,000/-. it is submitted that without enquiry, f.i.r. was lodged. the petitioner is ready to return the amount with regard to grains which has actually not been distributed to the beneficiaries after proper enquiry. considering the aforesaid undertaking of petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a patna high court cr.misc. no.2303 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 period of twelve weeks from today in connection with sadar p.s. case no. 348 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned c.j.m. darbhanga, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure. the prosecution party is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail of petitioner if the petitioner fails to comply the undertaking given before this court. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) u.k./-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2303 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2303 of 2012 ====================================================== Ram Vilash Mandal .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the P.D.S. dealer is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the petitioner under the scheme of Food for Work was supplied the grains but he did not give the account with regard to Rs. 7,00,000/-. It is submitted that without enquiry, F.I.R. was lodged. The petitioner is ready to return the amount with regard to grains which has actually not been distributed to the beneficiaries after proper enquiry. Considering the aforesaid undertaking of petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2303 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 348 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Darbhanga, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The prosecution party is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail of petitioner if the petitioner fails to comply the undertaking given before this Court. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) U.K./-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial