Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The State of Bihar and ors Vs. Suraj Mahto and ors

The State of Bihar and ors vs Suraj Mahto and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974324

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The State of Bihar and ors

Respondent

Suraj Mahto and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna letters patent appeal no.136 of 2011 in civil writ jurisdiction case no. 2961 of 2007 with interlocutory application no. 612 of 2011 with interlocutory application no. 613 of 2011 in letters patent appeal no.136 of 2011 ====================================================== the state of bihar & ors .... .... appellants versus suraj mahto & ors .... .... respondents ====================================================== appearance : for the appellants : mr. prashant kashyap, ac to aag-4 ====================================================== coram: honourable the chief justice and honourable mr. justice birendra prasad verma oral order (per: honourable the chief justice) 3. 24-01-2012 in spite of the order dated 25th january 2011, notice to the respondent no.16 has not been issued by the registry. notice will be issued upon the respondent no.16 for hearing on limitation petition and for hearing and final disposal of the appeal, to be made returnable on 20th march 2012. notice will be served through the registered post with 2 patna high court lpa no.136 of 2011 (3) dt.24-01-2012 2/2 a/d. requisites will be filed within one week from today. (r.m. doshit, cj) (birendra prasad verma, j) pawan/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.136 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2961 of 2007 With Interlocutory Application No. 612 of 2011 With Interlocutory Application No. 613 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.136 of 2011 ====================================================== The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Appellants Versus Suraj Mahto & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. Prashant Kashyap, AC to AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3. 24-01-2012 In spite of the order dated 25th January 2011, notice to the respondent no.16 has not been issued by the Registry. Notice will be issued upon the respondent no.16 for hearing on limitation petition and for hearing and final disposal of the Appeal, to be made returnable on 20th March 2012. Notice will be served through the registered post with 2 Patna High Court LPA No.136 of 2011 (3) dt.24-01-2012 2/2 A/d. Requisites will be filed within one week from today. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Pawan/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial