Madhya Pradesh Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.H. Guha Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.24156/2003 (O.A.No.97/1999-B) S.H.Guha. Vs The State of M.P.and another. PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi.J.Shri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for the Petitioner. Shri Akhilesh Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for respondents. ORDER (28.6.2012) 1: This petition was originally filed as Original Application before the M.P.Administrative Tribunal Bench at Bhopal, by the petitioner, which has come on transfer to this Court after closure of the Tribunal and is registered as Writ Petition. 2: The claim made by the petitioner was that the petitioner was appointed as Ranger in Forest Department on 1.11.1964 and became eligible for promotion as Assistant Conservator of Forest on 17.12.1975. However, instead of considering the promotion of the petitioner in that year, he was promoted vide order dated 29.12.1988 as Assistant Conservator of Forest. He was making representation claiming promotion with retrospective effect, but since th...
Dr. B.C. Mahapatra Vs. M.P. Bhoj (Open) University
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
W.P.No.4817/2012 & W.P.No.4821/2012 28.6.2012 Shri D.S.Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Smt.P.L. Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respondents University. Challenging the orders passed by the respondent- University terminating the appointment of the petitioneRs.both these petitions have been filed and as common questions of facts and law are involved, both these petitions are being disposed of by this common order. For the sake of convenience documents and material available in the record of W.P.No.4817/2012 are referred to in the order. Both the petitioners were appointed as Lecturers in the M.P.Bhoj (Open) University. They were appointed in pursuance to the applications and candidature submitted by them as called for in the advertisement Annexure P/1 issued on 5th September 2002. In the advertisement it was clearly stipulated that the appointment is on contract basis for a period of two years and services will come to an end after the contract period. Accordingly bot...
Raghavendra Ranjan Das Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No :3173. OF 199.Raghavendra Ranjan Das - V/s - Central Bank of India & Others Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Smt. Sobha Menon, learned Sr. Counsel with Shri C.A.Thomas, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri H.C.Kohli, learned counsel the for respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER ( 28/06/2012) Challenging the orders of punishment imposed on the petitioner vide Annexure-P10 & P11 dated 21.9.1996, reducing the pay of the petitioner by four stages in the time scale separately in each of the order and the order passed by the appellate authority Annexure-P16 dated 1.7.1997, rejecting his appeal, petitioner has filed this writ petition.2. Petitioner at the relevant time in the year 1995 was working as an Accountant Scale-1 in the Satna Branch of the respondents...
M/S Soms Tabrez Meat Suipliers Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
W.P.No.8043/2005 (M/s Sams Tabrez Meat Suppliers versus State of M.P.& ors.) 28.06.2012 Ms.Jai Laxmi Aiyer, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the petitioner is not being permitted to do the business of inter state trade of buffalo meat. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petition filed by the petitioner be disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to permit the petitioner to do so In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the entitlement of the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner may, if permitted or allowed to do so, proceed with his business strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C.as per rules. (R.S.Jha) Judge gn...
The State of M.P. Vs. Gajanand
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 Cr.A. No.1434 of 1996 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR BEFORE : TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL, J.CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1434 OF 199.APPELLANT: The State of M.P. Versus RESPONDENTS:1. Gajanand, S/o Shrikishan, Caste-Paliwal, aged 24 years, R/o Jaswadi, Police Station-Khandwa, at present R/o Head office-Khandwa, Rameshwar Road.2. Nathu, S/o Tukaram Mahajan, aged 26 years, R/o Khamni, P.S.Shahpur (M.P) ****************************************************************** For Appellant : Shri R.S. Shukla, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents : Shri Vivek Rusia, Advocate. ****************************************************************** JUDGMENT 28/06/2012 This appeal has been preferred under section 378 (1)/ (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 by the State appellant challenging the judgment dated 10/10/1995 passed by Judicial Magistrate, First Class Bhurhanpur in Criminal Case No.2349/1984, acquitting the respondents of the charge under section 409 IPC.2. Facts of the case, in short, are that on resp...
Dr. Ram Naresh Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.1219/2012 Dr. Ram Naresh Tiwari Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others ____________________________________________________________ Shri K.C. Ghildiyal, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sheetal Dubey, learned Govt. Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Shri N.K. Mishra, learned Counsel for respondent No.3. ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ ORDER (28/06/2012) By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has called in question the order dated 17.01.2012 by which the petitioner has been transferred from the post of Regional Additional Director, Higher Education, Rewa Division, Rewa, to the post of Principal, Govt. Post Graduate Model Science College, Rewa, with the additional charge of the post of Principal of Govt. Sanskrit College, Rewa and respondent No.3 has ...
Bhupendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.8223/2012 Bhupendra Singh -Versus- The State of M.P.and otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi. Shri Anil Khare, learned Senior counsel Assisted by Ms.Nmrata Kesharwani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 and 3. Shri Manas Verma, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. ORDER (28.6.2012) 1: The petitioner, an Assistant Engineer of Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur, has come before this Court ventilating his grievance against the order dated 16.5.2012 issued by respondent No.1, by which a modification in the posting order of the petitioner is done and instead of transferring him to Municipal Corporation Ujjain, he is posted in the office of the Divisional Deputy Director, Urban Administration, Jabalpur 2 Division Jabalpur, with a condition that he will be posted only in the office and will not be assigned any field duty, on the groun...
O.P. Saxena Vs. M.P. Madhya Kshetra Vidhyut Vitran Co.Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
28.6.2012 R.P.No.474/2012 Shri Ashok Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for the respondent. Heard. This petition has been filed for review of the order dated 16.4.2012 passed by this Court in W.P.No.1860/07(s) by which the matter was remanded to the Labour Court as certain vital questions which were material for the decision of controveRs.involved in the case had escaped the attention of the Labour Court as well as the Industrial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited the attention of this Court to Annexure P/5 i.e.the order dated 22.3.1999 by which the petitioner was directed to submit an application for earned leave for a period from 6.8.1998 to 7.8.1998 and 14.8.1998 to 26.8.1998. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also referred to the statement of the witness namely R.K.Sengar annexed with the writ petition as Annexure P/6, in support of the contention that though the petitioner had submitted his joining yet he was n...
Laman Singh and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: Honble Mr. Justice N.K.Gupta, J.Criminal Appeal No.854/2003 Laman Singh and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Amit Upadhyay, Advocate for the appellants. Shri G. S. Thakur, Panel lawyer for the respondent-State. Shri Gopal Jaiswal, counsel for the complainant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 28th day of June, 2012) The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment and conviction dated 14.5.2003 passed by the Special Judge under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Mandla in Special Case No.137/2000 whereby the appellants were convicted and sentenced as mentioned in the table below: Conviction u/s Sentence Fine Sentence, in amount default of payment of fine. 294 of IPC Two months Rs.200 15 days simple R.I. imprisonment 341 of IPC Two m...
Smt.Saroj Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR W.P. No.4857/2006 Smt. Saroj Patel Vs. State of MP and others Present : Honble Mr. Justice R.S. Jha. For the petitioner : Shri S.K. Garg, advocate. For the respondents : Shri Puneet Shroti, P.L. ORDER (28.06.2012) The petitioner has filed this petition claiming compensation from the respondents/Jail authorities and State alleging custodial death of her husband who was lodged in the Central Jail, Seoni at the time of his death.2. It is alleged by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the death of the husband of the petitioner has resulted on account of negligence and ill-treatment on the part of the respondents/jail authorities. It is further alleged that the police authorities did not care to inform the petitioner when her husband was admitted in the Medical College and Hospital, Jabalpur and infact they tried to dispose of the body of her husband without informing the petitioner and in such circumstances, the 2 respondents/authorities be...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »