Madhya Pradesh Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jeevanlal Vs. Puranlal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
W.P.No.8713/2012 (Jeevanlal versus Puranlal & ors.) 29.06.2012 Heard Shri Umesh Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The learned counsel for the petitioner having assailed the validity of order dated 04.05.12 passed by the FiRs.Additional District Judge, Balaghat in Misc. Appeal No.17/12 and having argued at length, submits that he will implead the Janpad Panchayat as party and has prayed for an observation to the effect that on his doing the same and filing a fresh application for injunction, the court below be directed to take a decision on the application at an early date. In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with an observation that in case the petitioner files a fresh application for injunction in the pending suit after impleading the Janpad Panchayat, Lanji, District Balaghat, the court below shall take up the matter at an early date and after hearing all concerned shall decide the ap...
Smt. Geeta Ambedkar Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
Writ Petition No.4140/2012 29.6.2012 Shri K.B.Bhatnagar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Heard on admission. The petitioner, aggrieved with the rejection of her prayer for the change of her date of birth recorded in the service book by the respondents and Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, has filed the present petition. On 4.2.1981 the petitioner was appointed as Auditor in the Office of Controller of Defence Accounts, Jabalpur. Her appointment was through the Special Recruitment Examination conducted in May 1980. She, in her application for appearing in the Special Recruitment Examination, had mentioned her date of birth as 1.7.1952. The application was also supported by her declaration that the information rendered by her is true and correct. The date of birth so informed by the petitioner was verified from her original Higher Secondary School Certificate which she had produced on the date of her appointment. Accordingly, in the fiRs.page of her service book her date of ...
Rewa Ram Rajput Vs. Prem Narayan Rajput
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
Writ Petition No.9198 / 2012 (Rewa Ram Rajput .versus Prem Narayan Rajput & otheRs.28-06-2012 Heard Shri A.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by orders dated 15-12-2011 and 22-12-2011 by which the trial Court has rejected the petitioner's application under Order XVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure and listed the case for final arguments. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the defendant No.1, Rewaram was medically indisposed and that is why his statement could not be recorded on the date given by the trial Court and the Court below ignoring the aforesaid aspect closed the evidence of the petitioner/defendant and listed the case for final arguments on 15-12-2011 and reiterated the order on 22-12-2011. It is further submitted that the proceedings to the suit had been stayed by this Court by order dated 6-1-2012 passed in W.P.No.20644/2011 and in such circumstan...
Haji Sayyad Rashid Ali Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
M.Cr.C.No.4972/12 28/6/2012. Shri Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y. Dwivedi, P.L.for the respondent no.1/State. Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the respondent no.2. Arguments heard. This is a petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code.).for quashing of (i) the order-dated 17/4/2012 passed by Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, JMFC, Jabalpur, under Section 156(3) of the Code, forwarding the complaint made by respondent no.2, to SHO, P.S.Cantt. Jabalpur, for investigation, after recording an FIR against the petitioner in respect of the offence punishable under Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.).(ii) the FIR leading to registration of Crime No.161/2012 at the Police Station as well as the consequent proceedings of investigation. Marriage of the respondent no.2 was solemnized with Shahnaz, the daughter of the petitioner, in the year 2006. On 20/1/2007, they were blessed with a son named Tabrez...
Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Registrar, Barkatullah University and ors
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR Writ Petition No.434/2004 The Senior Administrative Officer, Bhopal and others.Petitioners Versus K. G. Sudarsanan and another...Respondents For the petitioners : Shri S. A. Dharmadhikari, Advocate. For respondent : Shri D. K. Dixit, Advocate. no.1 For respondent : None, though served. no.2 ****** Present: HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV ****** ORDER (28.6.2012) The following order of the Court was passed by Ajit Singh, J.This petition is directed against the order dated 14.11.2003, Annexure P1, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench (in short, the Tribunal.) whereby it has allowed the Original Application No.15/2000 filed by respondent no.1 directing the petitioners to fix his seniority on the post of senior clerk from 24.11.1982.2. The petitioners are officers of the Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering (in short, the CIAE.). Respondent no.1 was initially posted as junior cl...
Mueen @ Mubeen Kha Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
28.6.2012 W.P.No.21497/2011 Shri R.S.Patel, learned connsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned Government Advocate for the respondents. With consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.5.2011 passed under Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 by which the petitioner has been detained. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that all the cases mentioned in the grounds of detention do not pertain to serious offences and the petitioner has already been acquitted in most of the offences. The offences alleged against the petitioner do not pertain to public order, but law and order. It is further submitted that petitioner has not committed any offence after 2007. The incidents which have been referred to in the grounds of detention are old and are too remote to the order of detention. In support of his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance in the case of Re...
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Khandwa Vs. Rameshwar Kolde
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 W.A. No. 495/2006 28.6.2012 Shri K.N. Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Avinash Zargar, learned counsel for respondent No. 1. With consent they are heard. This writ appeal under Section 2 of Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nayalaya (Khand Nayayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 is directed against the order dated 28.6.2006 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 2859/1995. The writ petition in turn was directed against an order dated 16.4.1995 passed by Labour Court in Industrial Case No. 9/1992; whereby, an application preferred by respondent No. 1 under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking realization of the amount deducted toward Provident Fund along with interest was allowed. Respondent No. 1, presently in his Eighties, was in the service of Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Khandwa as Sub Engineer and retired from the said post in the year 1991. Being ...
M/S Gangabishan Dwarikadas Agrwal Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 W.P No.1529/2005 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1529/2005 PETITIONER : M/S GANGABISHAN DWARIKADAS AGRAWAL Vs. RESPONDENTS : STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS. Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice R.S. Jha. For the petitioner : Shri Ashish Shroti, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, Govt. Advocate. For respondent no.3 : Shri D. K. Dixit, Advocate. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (28/06/2012) The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the demand notice dated 15.03.2005 passed by the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti by which the respondent had asked the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.1,76,528/- towards Mandi Fees and a sum of Rs.44,099.27 towards Nirashrit Shulk.2. This Court, by interim order dated 25.3.2005 had directed that in case the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs.50,000/- by 15.4.2005, his licence shall be renewed with effect from 1.4.2005. 2 W.P No.1529/2005 3. It is informed by ...
Raj Kumar Bhamri Vs. Gyan Singh Rajput
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
W.P.No.4457/2012 28.6.2012 Shri K.N.Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ashok Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. Challenging an interlocutory order dated 15.3.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Sagar in a pending industrial dispute pertaining to termination of service of respondent No.1 by the petitioner's establishment, this writ petition has been filed. Facts that have come on record indicates that respondent the workman concerned claimed that he was working in the establishment of the petitioner, a propriety concern since 1990. He was working on a monthly salary of Rs.6000/- per month with certain deductions. It was his case that he was working continuously when on 28.6.2007 his services were orally terminated. Inter alia contending that his termination amounts to retrenchment and as provisions of Industrial Disputes Act has not been complied with, it was alleged that the termination is illegal. It seems that in support of his contention a written stat...
Brajesh Kumar Singh Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.13029/2009 Brajesh Kumar Singh & antother Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others ____________________________________________________________ Shri Rajendra Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioners. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Government Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Ms. Amrit Ruprah, learned Counsel for respondent No.3. ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ ORDER (27/06/2012) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is in fact the second round of litigation before this Court by the petitioners (two in number) claiming payment of salary from the head of grant-in-aid. It is contended that the petitioners were engaged in a school established by the respondent No.3. The said school was receiving grant-in-aid but the salary was not being paid to the petitioners as was paya...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »