Madhya Pradesh Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.B. Singh Vs. the Director General
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
W.P.No.8348/2012 19.06.2012 Shri K.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. It is contended that in similar circumstances, in other writ petitions this Court has granted interim relief while entertaining the writ petition. It is contended that since the petitioner has not been allotted any quarter at Mumbai at present, it will not be possible for the petitioner to vacate the quarter at Bhopal to shift his family to Mumbai where he has been posted. Considering the aforesaid, issue notice of this writ petition to the respondents on payment of Process Fee within seven days by registered A.D. The notices be made returnable in four weeks. Till next consideration of interim prayer, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner for eviction of his family from the quarter in dispute at Bhopal. List along with W.P.No.14094/2011 and W.P.No.3603/2010 immediately after four weeks. Certified copy as per rules. (K.K.Trivedi) Judge. A.Praj....
VipIn Agrawal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
W.P.No. 8585 / 2012 ( Vipin Agrawal..v. ..State of M.P. & two others ) 19-06-2012 Shri Brian D'Silva, learned senior counsel with Shri V.Bhide, for the petitioner. Ms. Mansi Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for a direction to quash communication dated 29-5-2012 issued by the respondent No. 3, Superintendent of Police, Harda informing him that there is a policy decision of the police Headquarter not to provide police protection on mere request by a private person. It is submitted by the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner that he has established a sugar industry in respect of which a civil dispute is pending in the District Court, Harda. It is stated that several people on several occasions have assaulted the petitioner and his employees and therefore there is a threat to his life and liberty and on that count he has applied to the police authorities for poli...
Jainarayan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
1 W.P. No.8489/2012 Jainarayan Singh vs. State of M.P. & Ors. 19.06.2012 Heard Shri Ramesh Kumar Tiwari learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 26.5.2012 issued by the Collector, Anuppur directing the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kotma, District Anuppur to lodged a first information report against the petitioner in respect of defalcation of certain amount of money. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is already a finding in favour of the petitioner by the lower authorities ignoring which the aforesaid order has been issued. It is, however, observed that the petitioner has directly approached this Court without filing any application before the authorities bringing to their notice the aforesaid facts. In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the pet...
P.B.Soni Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
W.P.No.8653/2012 19/06/2012 Shri Mukesh Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned GA for the respondents/State. Petitioner, who is working as Senior Geo hydrologist in the office of Devisional Ground Water Survey Jabalpur, has filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 14.6.2012 (Annexure-P1), by which he has been transferred to Bhopal. Challenge to the order of transfer is made mainly on the ground that petitioner is to retire in the month of March, 2013 and there is only 8 months to go and transfer of the petitioner is contrary to Condition 9.12 of the transfer policy. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Government Advocate submits that against the petitioner, due to certain irregularity committed, a departmental enquiry is initiated and in the transfer order Annexure-P1, it is clearly stated that the petitioner is removed from the area to facilitate the departmental enquiry, as the department apprehends an impartial enquiry is not possible with...
The State of Mp Vs. Prahlad Singh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
1 Cr.R. No.435/1993 & Cr.A No. 187/1994 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH:HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE T.K. KAUSHAL CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 435 OF 199.PETITIONER: Asha Bai Thakur, COMPLAINANT Widow of Ram Prakash Thakur, at present resident of Ward No. 2, Junardeo, District- Chhindwara (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENT:1. Prahlad Singh, ACCUSED S/o Roopa Baghel, aged 26 years, R/o Narayanganj, Police Station Bandol, District- Seoni (M.P.) 2. State of Madhya Pradesh ****************************************************************** For petitioner : None for the petitioner. For Respondent no.1 : Shri Siddharth Datt, Advocate For Respondent no.2 : Shri R.S. Shukla, Panel Lawyer ****************************************************************** CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 187 OF 199.APPELLANT: State of Madhya Pradesh through P .S. Bandol, Seoni Versus RESPONDENT:1. Prahlad Singh, ACCUSED S/o Roopa Baghel, aged 26 years, R/o Narayanganj, P.S. Bandol, District-...
Devi Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
W.A.No.600/2012 Devi Singh State of M.P. & others 19.6.2012 Shri Ghanshyam Sharma, counsel for appellant. Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, G.A., for respondents. I.A.No.7430/2012 for condonation of delay. There is delay of 96 days days in filing this appeal. Learned counsel for State has no objection if the delay is condoned and the matter is heard on admission. In view of aforesaid, delay in filing this appeal is condoned. Heard on admission. Learned counsel for appellant submitted that the Collector by invoking powers under section 50 of the M.P.Land Revenue Code, 1959 for suo motu revision directed correction of entries in the revenue records, while the appellant's name was recorded 24 years back on the basis of settlement of land in favour of appellant. It was submitted that after 24 years of recording the name of appellant in the revenue record, the Collector was having no jurisdiction to invoke such powers and the learned Single Judge erred in dismissing the writ petition. Shri Samdarshi T...