Madhya Pradesh Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rohit Kumar Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
1 W.P.No.9101/2012 Rohit Kumar Patel versus State of M.P.& ORS.29.06.2012 Heard Smt. Sudha Gautam learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the petitioner's result of 10th class conducted by the Board of Secondary Examination, M.P in the year 2012 has not been declared by the respondent authorities. Apparently, the petitioner has approached this Court directly without filing any representation before the respondent authorities. In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files a representation before the respondent authorities within fifteen days alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter. With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the peti...
Archana Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
1 W.P.No.8072/2012 Archana Dwivedi versus State of M.P.& ORS.29.06.2012 Heard Shri Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the respondent authorities have not declared the petitioner's result of D.Ed. Exam for the academic sessions 2007-08. However, it is apparent that the petitioner has directly approached this court without filing any representation before the authorities. In view of th aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files a representation before the authorities alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition within 15 days, the concerned authority shall examine the same and take a decision thereon expeditiously in accordance with law as far as possible within a period of one month thereafter. With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed o...
J.K. Sahu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
W.P.No.9326 / 2012 (J.K.Sahu ..v...The State of M.P.& another) 29-06-2012 Shri A.P.Shroti, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.P.Tiwari, learned G.A.for the State/respondent. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that in spite of orders passed by this Court on 19-6-2012 in W.P.No.7666/2012 the respondent/Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Bhopal, has passed an order dated 22-6-2012 proceeding further in the matter without complying with the directions issued in the orders dated 19-1-2011 and 14-2-2012 regarding supply of documents. The learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the respondent/State was directed to seek instructions. On instructions, he submits that in fact the intention of the authority is to comply with the order passed by this Court though the order dated 22-6-2012 was not happily worded. It is submitted that the petitioner would be supplied the documents as ordered by the Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Bhopal in his previous orders dated ...
Fakir Mohammad Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
W.P.No.8036/2012 (Fakir Mohd. versus State of M.P.& ors.) 29.06.2012 Heard Shri Nilesh Kotecha, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondent authorities to change the revenue entry in respect of the land occupied by him. The procedure for obtaining the aforesaid relief has been prescribed statutorily under the M.P.Land Revenue Code. In the circumstances, the petitioner has to avail of the remedy in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the M.P.Land Revenue Code for redressal of his grievances. In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an application before the respondent authorities in accordance with law. In case, the petitioner files such an application within 15 days alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the concerned authority shall take up and deal with it expeditiousl...
Smt.Shobha Singh Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
W.P.No.10442/2008 29.6.2012 Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Mohan Saunsarkar, learned counsel for Union of India. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents- State. Petitioner is a widow of Late Shri Ramchandra Singh. Late Ramchandra Singh was a freedom fighter and was receiving freedom fighter pension and as the said benefit was denied by the respondents vide Annexure P/11 dated 21st March, 2001, petitioner has filed this writ petition. Shri S.K.Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner invites my attention to the reason indicated in the impugned order and points out that only on the basis of age of petitioner's son Shri Sapan Kumar recorded in a succession Certificate issued on 10th April, 1999 claim of the petitioner is rejected. It is pointed out that in the Succession Certificate an error has occurred in recording the age of petitioner's son and by filing overwhelming documents including Certificate issued by the Board of Seco...
Arjun Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
1 Criminal Appeal No.300/2008 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.300/2008 Arjun Singh and others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri Manish Datt, senior counsel with Shri Ajay Mishra, counsel for the appellants. Shri G.S. Thakur, Panel Lawyer the respondent/State. Shri R.K. Yadav, counsel for the complainant. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Passed on 29th day of June, 2012) The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 28.1.2008 in S.T. No.184/2006 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Khandwa, whereby the appellants were convicted for the offences pun...
Dharamdas Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: Honble Mr. Justice N.K.Gupta, J.Criminal Appeal No.1448 of 1996 Dharamdas alias Kunjilal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri N. S. Ruprah, counsel for the appellant. Shri G. S. Thakur, Panel lawyer for the respondent-State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT th (Delivered on the 29 day of June, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 8.8.1996 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Mudwara (Katni) as a Special Judge under SC/ ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in Special Case No.39/1995 whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 294 of I.P.C and Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter it is mentioned as Special Act.) and sentenced with fine of Rs.250/- and six months rigorous impri...
Santosh Kumar Jaiswal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
1 W.P.No.8519/2012 Santosh Kumar Jaiswal versus State of M.P.& ORS.29.06.2012 Heard Shri Anil Kumar Jain learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for quashing of the note-sheet dated 29.11.2011 and 9.12.2011 of the respondent Corporation as well as for issuance of a direction to the respondent authorities to restore possession of the tenanted premises to the petitioner. From a perusal of the records, it is apparent that the respondent Corporation undertook proceedings of attachment of the property on account of property tax dues against the owner and, thereafter, while handing back possession to the landlord, the landlord has affixed his lock on the premises and did not permit the petitioner, who is a tenant, to enter the same. In view of the aforesaid, it is apparent that there is a dispute between the petitioner and the landlord and the petitioner by way of the present petition is infact seekin...
Dabbal Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
W.P.No.8760/2012 (Dabbal Singh versus State of M.P.& ors.) 29.06.2012 Shri Arup K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.K.Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State on advance copy. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that inspite of the fact that on the complaint of the petitioner an enquiry in the matter was conducted by the Collector, Narsingpur and in the enquiry so conducted it was found that the BLA coal company dumped overburden/coal wastage on the petitioner's land, which is required to be removed, but no steps have been taken by the authorities to do so. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the report, to the effect that the BLA Coal Company has encroached upon the petitioner's land and dumped overburden/coal wastage thereon, has been forwarded to the Collector by the Tahsildar and the petitioner has filed a representation dated 31.01.2012 before the Collector, Narsinghpur, which ...
Asif Ali Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2012
1 W.P.No.9103/2012 Asif Ali versus State of M.P.& ORS.29.06.2012 Heard Smt. Sudha Gautam learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the petitioner's result of 12th class conducted by the Board of Secondary Examination, M.P in the year 2012 has not been declared by the respondent authorities. Apparently, the petitioner has approached this Court directly without filing any representation before the respondent authorities. In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files a representation before the respondent authorities within fifteen days alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter. With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the petitioner st...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »