Madhya Pradesh Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sheikh Kayyam Vs. the South Eastern Coal Field Limited
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.9004/2011 Sheikh Kayyum Vs. The South Eastern Coal Field Limited & others ____________________________________________________________ Shri Shakeel Ahmed, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Indira Nair, Senior Counsel assisted by Shri P. Shankaran, learned Counsel for respondents No.1 to 6. ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ ORDER (28/06/2012) The grievance of the petitioner in short is that his date of birth was incorrectly recorded in his service roll and he was issued a letter for superannuation with effect from 30.06.2012. Earlier when the communication was made with respect to entry in the date of birth, the petitioner made a representation pointing out that his date of birth was wrongly recorded. Since nothing was being done in this respect, the petitioner came before this Court by filing...
Ram Singh Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 Cr.A.No.522/1994 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH:HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE T.K.KAUSHAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.522/1994 Appellant: Ram Singh S/o Mohan Singh Lodhi, aged about 24 years, R/o Manguwa P.S. Kumhari, Tahsil Hatta, District Damoh (M.P.) Vs. Respondent: The State of Madhya Pradesh For Appellant : Shri S.K. Nema, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Umesh Pandey, Government Advocate JUDGMENT .07.2012 This appeal has been preferred against judgment dated 29.03.1994 passed by III Additional Sessions Judge, Damoh delivered in S.T. No.122/1993 convicting the appellant under Section 302 of IPC for committing murder of Churaman (since deceased) and sentencing him to imprisonment for life.2. Facts of the case, in short, are that on 09.06.1993 in the evening while deceased was taking meals, Ramkishan (PW9) along with Kallu (PW5) reached his house and asked him to lift the wood log fro...
Uttam Gororey Vs. Madhya Pradesh Rjaya Krishi Vipnan Board
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.11724/2007(S) Uttam Gororey and another. -Versus- M.P.Rajya Krishi Vipnan and otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi. Shri P.R.Bhave, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri S.D.Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Akash Choudhary, learned counsel for respondent No.5. ORDER (27.06.2012) 1: This petition is filed by the petitioneRs.two in number, claiming benefit of seniority over and above the respondents No.4 and 5, and consequential benefits of grant of promotion on the post of Section Officer. 2: Brief facts giving rise to filing of this petition are that the petitioners were engaged in the services of M.P.State Agriculture Marketing Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board for short) on contingency. There were Regulations made by the Board. In terms of the Regulation, it was decided to conduct a departmental exami...
Uttam Kumar Pardasani Vs. Shri Bharat Tandon
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2012
Criminal Appeal No.1500/2011 27/06/2012 Appellant Uttam Kumar Pardasani present in person. Shri Sanjeev Mishra, Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2. Heard on admission. The appellant has submitted an appeal against the order dated 24.1.2011 passed by the Vivek Singh Raghuvanshi, Presiding Officer, Labour Court No.1, Bhopal and also against the order dated 12.5.2011 passed by the 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal in Criminal Revision No.227/2011. The facts of the case are that an application under Section 340 of Cr.P.C.was filed before the Labour Court, which was not accepted, and therefore present appeal is filed under Section 341 of Cr.P.C.before this Court. Secondly, a revision was moved against the order passed by the Labour Court, which was dismissed by the 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal vide order dated 12.5.2011. After considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and appellant himself, if appellant was aggrieved with the order passed by the...
Krishnadhar Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2012
W.P.No.7396/2011 27/06/2012 Shri Dhananjay Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner. As the petitioner is claiming the benefit of appointment and pension in accordance to his initial date of appointment and as somewhat similar question has already been considered and decided in the case of Rohini Prasad Diwedi versus State of M.P.and others in W.P.No.17127/2003 on 6.1.2004, respondents are directed to examine the case of the petitioner in the light of the principles laid down in the case of Rohini Prasad Diwedi (Supra) and decide it by a speaking order. With the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of. Certified Copy as per rules. (Rajendra Menon) Judge nd...
Rajendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2012
W.P.No.8784 / 2012 (Rajendra Singh ..v ..State of M.P.& otheRs.27-06-2012 Heard Shri Anil Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that in spite of the fact that on account of natural calamity his claim for compensation and financial assistance has been processed and forwarded by the concerned Patwari and Revenue Inspector in Annexure P-6, on 30-6-2011, no compensation till date has been disbursed to the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Assistant Director (Horticulture).Umaria has recommended the case of the petitioner to the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue).Umaria but no compensation has been disbursed to the petitioner and in such circumstances appropriate directions be issued to the respondent/authorities. It is, however, observed that the petitioner has directly approached this Court without filing any representation before the Sub Divisional Officer, Umari...
M/S Universal Transport Vs. Smt.Saroj Kapoor and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2012
1 FA No.344/1995 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava First Appeal No.344/1995 .....APPELLANT/ M/s Universal Transport, New DEFENDANT Itwara Road, Bhopal (M.P.) -Versus- ....RESPONDENTS:1. a) Smt. Saroj Kapoor widow of Late PLAINTIFFS Narsingh Kapoor 1(b) Smt. Neelam Tuneja, w/o Shri Vinot Tuneja, daughter of Late Narsingh Kapoor, 1(c) Smt. Sumeeta Chhabra w/o Suresh Chhabra, daughter of Late Narsingh Kapoor 1(d) Jitendra s/o Late Narsingh Kapoor; 1(e) Ku. Neetu Kapoor, daughter of Late Narsingh Kapoor; All residents of 'Koh-e-Fiza', Bhopal (M.P.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate for the appellant. Shri T.S. Ruprah, Senior Advocate with Shri Harmeet Ruprah, Advocate for the respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER { 27.06.2012 } Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 23.9.1995...
Seva Sahkari Samiti Darguwan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2012
W.P.No.8512 / 2012 (Sewa Sahkari Samiti, Darguwan .v .State of M.P.& ors.) 27-06-2012 Shri Shreyas Pandit, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Anil Lala, learned counsel for the caveator. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 7-5-2012 by which it is alleged that the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue).Bijawar, District Chhatarpur, without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or following the procedure prescribed by law, has passed an order allotting the fair price shop run by the petitioner/society to the respondent No.5. Admittedly and apparently, the impugned order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue).Bijawar, District Chhatarpur is appealable before the Collector. In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to assail the impugned order before the Collector, Chhatarpur in accordance with law. It needs no emphasis to state that in ...
Nichkawa Saket Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2012
1 W.P.No.8731/2012 Nichkawa Saket versus State of M.P.& ORS.27.06.2012 Shri Arun Pandey learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.P.Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate, for the respondent/State. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to the respondent no.6 to take up and pass orders on the application dated 24.10.2011 filed by the petitioner for making correction of the typographical error that has occurred in the order passed by him on 29.8.2009 wherein instead of issuing a direction to the Collector, Rewa the direction has, by mistake, been issued to Collector, Sidhi. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that inspite of the fact that the petitioner had withdrawn the previous petition filed by him to pursue the application, no orders on the application for correction of the typographical/clerical mistake has been passed by the respondent no.6 although the application is pending since the last 8...
The State of M.P. Vs. Chootelal Singh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2012
1 Cr.A. No.886 of 1997 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR BEFORE : TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL, J.CRIMINAL APPEAL No.886 OF 199.APPELLANT: The State of M.P. Versus RESPONDENTS:1. Chhotelal Singh, S/o Rudra Pratap Singh, aged 48 years, R/o Rampur Mudwar 2. Narendra Man Singh, S/o Rudra Pratap Singh, aged 47 years, R/o Rampur 3. Mithlesh Pratap Singh, S/o Narendra Man Singh, aged 22 years, R/o Rampur All resident of Gram Rampur Mudwar, P.S Amarpatan, District- Satna (M.P) ****************************************************************** For Appellant : Shri R.S. Shukla, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents : Shri D.S Chouhan, Advocate. ****************************************************************** JUDGMENT 27/06/2012 This appeal has been preferred under section 378 (1)/ (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 by the State appellant against the judgment dated 28/11/1996 passed by Judicial Magistrate, First Class Amarpatan, District-Satna in regular Criminal Case No.345/1990, acquitting the resp...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »