Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and ors. Vs. R.K.Thakur
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 523 of 2010 ---- Union of India & Ors. ...... Appellants Vs. R.K. Thakur ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ------ For the Appellants : Mr. Faiz-ur-Rahman For the Respondent : M/s Rajiv Ranjan Order No. 09 ------ Dated 1st September, 2012 I.A. No. 4458 of 2010 Heard learned counsel for the appellants on the application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act. There is delay of 183 days in preferring the appeal. However, in view of the explanation made in the limitation application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The I.A stands disposed of. Put up this case under the heading 'for admission' after two weeks. (Prakash Tatia, C J) (Aparesh Kumar Singh , J) Alankar/-...
Shilendra Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5583 of 2012 ------ Shilendra Sahu . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Vishwakarma, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 01.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Gumla P.S. Case No. 94 of 2011 corresponding to G.R No. 289 of 2011, S.T Case No.238 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 302, 387 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In view of the direct allegation against the petitioner to have fired pistol, causing the death of the deceased, the bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by order dated 30.1.2012 in B.A No. 9454 of 2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner has renewed the prayer for bail, submitting that the other co-accused has been granted bail. In the facts of this case, I am no...
Kanthi Lal Mandal Alias Kanthilal Mandal Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6293 of 2012 Kanthi Lal Mandal @ Kanthilal Mandal ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opp. Party. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH ------------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumr Deomani, Advocate. For the State : Mr. A.K. Pandey, A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012: Learned counsel while placing reliance on Annexure-3, has argued that the petitioner has purchased the coal in legal way. He has further argued that there is no charge against the petitioner that the petitioner has extracted coal by undertaking illegal mining. Further he contends that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he has purchased stolen coal from different persons. He further contends that till date name of the persons, who have unloaded the illegally mined stolen coal has not been disclosed by the police. He further contends that in absence of those persons, the petitioner cannot be held guilty for receiving and storing stolen coal item. H...
Ramu Singh Alias Ramu Kumar Singh and Other Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI --- A.B.A. No. 2459 of 2012 --- 1.Ramu Singh @ Ramu Kumar Singh 2.Shambhu Singh 3.Meera Devi ... ... ... ... ... ... Petitioners --Versus-- 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Khushboo Kumari ... ... ... ... Opp. Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --- 02/ 01.09.2012 Counsel for the petitioner is directed to make the informant as opposite party no.2 in this application. Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 by registered post with A/D as well as under ordinary process, for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. Rule is made returnable in admission matter by six weeks. Police will not arrest the petitioners namely Ramu Singh @ Ramu Kumar Singh, Shambhu Singh and Meera Devi in connection with the present case (Sadar P.S.Case No.344 of 2009, correspondin...
Badra Alam Alias Badre Alam Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5599 of 2012 ------ Badra Alam @ Badre Alam . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Md.Asadul Haque, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 4/ 01.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Pakur (Mal) P.S. Case No. 155 of 2012 corresponding to G.R No. 455 of 2012 for the offence under Sections 4 and 5 of Explosive Substance Act. From the F.I.R, it appears that the petitioner was apprehended along- with one Tata Sumo and one Maruti Van, from which, eleven bags and six bags respectively, of Ammonium Nitrate were recovered. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, Badra Alam @ Badre Alam is, hereby, rejected. (H.C.Mishra, J.) B.S/...
Rajeev Ranjan Bhagat Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. A.B.A. No. 2327 of 2012 Rajeev Ranjan Bhagat Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Petitioner : - Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate and Mr. M.K. Sah, Advocate. For the State : - A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012 The present anticipatory bail application is filed under Sections 438 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Mahgama P.S. Case No. 86 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 761 of 2012 for offence under Sections 420, 467, 471 and 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code and now the case is pending before the learned S.D.J.M., Godda in which the petitioner has reason to believe of being arrested by the Police. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP appearing on behalf of the State Perused the F.I.R. as well as other materials produced along with the petition as well as the counter affidavit. Having regard to the nature...
Mukesh Kasera and Another Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6310 of 2012 --- 1. Mukesh Kasera 2. Ashok Prasad Kasera Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pawan Kumar Choudhary, A.P.P. --- 2/01.09.2012 Present application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Tatijharia P.S. Case No. 15 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1754 of 2012 registered under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per the prosecution story 25 kg. old copper wire and 50 kg. of brass and copper old parts and 1 kg. of casted aluminium were said to be recovered from the Maruti Van of the petitioner. He has further submitted that merely because petitioner could not show the purchase of the items, would not amount to offence punishable under Section 414 of I.P.C. He further submits that to make out a case under Section 414...