Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Santosh Rajwar and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2486 of 2012 Raj Kumar Singh ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/01.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 26, 41, and 42 of the Indian Forest Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle, which was seized carrying of Mica Scraps. When the said vehicle loaded with Mica Scraps was chased, the driver fled away without showing any paper with the said Mica Scraps. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that, he has given his vehicle to one Manoj Kumar Gupta, who is the licence holder of Mica Scraps. Therefore, petitioner is not ...
Jalal Sao and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5754 of 2012 ------ 1. Jilal Sao 2. Fagu Sao . Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr.Ajit Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 01.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners have been made accused in Barkagaon P.S Case No.132 of 2010 corresponding to G.R No.2696 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 279, 304 (A), subsequently converted under Sections 302 and 201 of the I.P.C. The F.I.R was lodged about the death of the son of the informant in a motorcycle accident and it was stated in the F.I.R., which was lodged by the father of the deceased, that the accident had caused due to rash and negligent driving. The petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. It appears that subsequently after few months, the petitioners have been named by the family members of the inf...
Sanjay Singh Alias Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5553 of 2012 ------ Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Singh . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 01.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Sindri P.S. Case No. 2 of 2009 corresponding to G.R No. 145 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 468, 471 and 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code. Though the petitioner is named in the F.I.R, but from the F.I.R itself, it is apparent that the money, through draft and cash, was paid by the informant personally to the other co-accused persons and not to this petitioner. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Singh is directed to be released on bail, on ...
Shahjada Khan Alias Shahzada Khan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6346 of 2012. --- Shahjada Khan alias Shahzada Khan ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... ... ... ... Opposite Party. --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Krishna Shankar, Additional Public Prosecutor. --- 02. 01.09.2012. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is neither named in the first information report nor has been named in the statement recorded before the police under section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He further states that the petitioner's name was disclosed by the co-accused Imran Khan. He further submits that the petitioner has not been attributed any specific assault caused by fire arm injury on the person of the injured. He further states that declaration of name by the co-accused in the confessional statement before the police cannot be made basis of conviction. Conside...
Anil Sao Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6193 of 2012 Anil Sao Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Laik, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ----- 2/01.09.2012 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under Sections 395/397/412 of Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's name got transpired in a case of dacoity on the basis of the confessional statement made by co-accused- Lakhi Ram Das and said Lakhi Ram Das has already been acquitted and, therefore, the petitioner deserves to be admitted on bail. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfactio...
Pintu Alias Roshan Rakshit Alias Rashan Rakshit Vs. the State of Jhark ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6258 of 2012 --- Pintu alias Roshan Rakshit alias Roshan Rakhsit Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Milan Kumar Dey, Senior Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Amitabh, A.P.P. --- 2/01.09.2012 Present application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 34 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 717 of 2011 registered under Sections 394 & 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned senior advocate has vehemently argued that present case is being tried by the Judicial Magistrate. He has further stated that petitioner is in custody since 16.09.2011. He further contends that the first date fixed for prosecution witness was 1.3.2012 and trial has not been concluded so far without there being any fault on part of the accused. Therefore, accused-applicant is legally entitled to be enlarge on bail under Section 437 (6) of the Code...
Lallu Prasad Mehta Alias Lallu Prasad Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2441of2012 LalluPrasadMahta@LalluPrasadMahto ... ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand ... ... ...OppositeParty CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.A.K.Kashyap,Sr.Advocate Mr.ArvindKumarMehta,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012 Heard counsel appearingforthepetitionerand counsel appearingfortheState. Petitioneris apprehending his arrest inconnectionwith thecaseregisteredunderSections417/419/465/468/471oftheIndian PenalCodeinconnectionwithChatraSadarP.S.CaseNo.30of2012 correspondingtoG.R.No.115of2012pendingintheCourtofCivil JudgecumChiefJudicialMagistrate,Chatra. Counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that except Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code, all the Sections are bailable.Hehasfurthercontendedthathehasproducedcertificatesof Bablu Kumar, but he has not done any forgery on the certificates so deposited,therefore,offenceofthepetitionercomesonlyunderSection 419oftheIndianPenalCode. Counsel appearing f...
Krishna Mahto Kishna Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2043of2012 KrishnaMahto@KishnaMahto. ... ... ... ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioner: Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate. FortheState: A.P.P. 02/ 01.09.2012 Call for the case diary of Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 14 of 2012 (G.R.No.494 of 2012) from the Court of Sri Manish, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi and put up this case after receipt thereof. List it on 12.09.2012. In the meantime, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with the aforesaid case. [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S....
Jalpa Kisku Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.6269of2012 JalpaKisku Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty ----- CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ----- ForthePetitioner :Mr.M.B.Lal,Advocate FortheState :Mr.ManojKumarNo.2,A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012Learnedcounselforthepetitioner,afterarguingsometimes,seeks permissiontowithdrawthisbailapplication,atthisstage,withlibertyto file fresh one, after the statements of Smt. Churki Devi, wife of the deceasedarerecordedinthetrial. Dismissedaswithdrawnwiththeaforesaidliberty. (AlokSingh,J.) R.K....
Mohan Sahu Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2509 of 2012 Mohan Sahu ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Kavita Sahu ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/01.09.2012 Issue notice to the O.P. No.2 in the admission matter on her present and correct address by registered post with A/D as well as by ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week from the date of this order, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. Rule is made returnable in the admission matter by six weeks. Police will not arrest the petitioner, namely, Mohan Sahu in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No. 111 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 1460 of 2012 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, till 01.11.2012. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra...