Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neshar Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6244 of 2012 --- Neshar Ansari Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. --- 2/01.09.2012 Present application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Kuru P.S. Case No. 23 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 122 of 2012 registered under Sections 392, 395 & 412 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, in the intervening night of 20-21.03.2012 at about 1:30 A.M., some miscreants broke the door and entered into the room of the informant and all the miscreants were armed with the knife, Aari and rod and on the point of knife and other arms have looted 13,000/- and mobile phones of L.G., Nokia and Spice. During the investigation, mobile phones looted from the informant were recovered from the house of applicant as well as co- accused Adam. Call details of looted mobiles s...
Lokan Thakur Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6286 of 2012 Lokan Thakur ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opp. Party. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH ------------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shree Prakash Roy, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012: Petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased, Kumkum Kumari. Petitioner is an old man aged 75 years and is in judicial custody since 05.04.2012 and till date cause of death seems to be by consuming of poison. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly age of the petitioner, who is father-in-law of the deceased, and his health, I direct that let the petitioner, namely, Lokan Thakur be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties bond to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Giridih, in connection with Birni P.S. Case No. 91 of 2009 (corresponding to G.R. No. 2040 of 2009). (ALOK SINGH, J) Sharma...
Om Prakash Jumurani Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6289 of 2012 Om Prakash Jumurani ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opp. Party. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH ------------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Dilip Kumar Chakraverty, A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012: Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the only allegation against the petitioner is that several articles in large scale having labels of different companies were recovered from his house and the petitioner failed to produce any valid papers in respect of the manufacturing, selling and purchasing of grease, Mobil, bitumen etc. of the companies whose labels were recovered from the house of the petitioner. Mr Tewari has further argued that neither any complaint was filed by such company saying that the petitioner is selling duplicate materials claiming to be of the Company, thereby causing financial loss to the Company and financial gain to petitioner. He has fur...
Sardar Soren Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6288 of 2012 Sardar Soren ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opp. Party. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH ------------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was facing trial for an offence punishable under 498 A of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of the learned S.D.J.M., Godda. She has further submitted that matter has been amicably settled between the parties and, therefore, the petitioner was under impression that criminal case would have been dropped. She has further submitted that for the above reasons the petitioner could not appear before the trial Court and ultimately he was arrested on 28.5.2012 and now his bail has been rejected only on the ground that the petitioner could not appear before the trial Court for a long. Learned counsel further submits that the petiti...
Raj Kumar Mitra and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1818of2012 1. RajKumarMitra.2. JagdishTiwari.3. LutanSingh. ... ... ... ...Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioners: Mr.SidharthaRoy,Advocate. FortheState: A.P.P. 04/ 01.09.2012 It is alleged in the F.I.R. that all the petitioners on 28.07.2011 restrained the informant and his companion and caused assault to them. It is also alleged that they were demanding Rs. 10 lakh as Rangdari and in course of scuffle, they took away golden chain, Titan wrist watch and Rs.1500 in cash. It is also submitted that no case under Section 387 I.P.C. is made out and Section 379 I.P.C. has been super added. As matter of fact, it is the petitioner No.3, who was assaulted by the informant for which Dhanbad P.S. Case No.601/ 2011 has been lodged. The informant himself has taken Rs. 3 lakh for providing job to the brother-in-law of the petitioner No.1. When no job was...
Shanti Choudhary Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2488 of 2012 Shanti Choudhary ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Shikha Jha ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Somitra Baroi, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/01.09.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the complainant as O.P. No.2 Issue notice to the O.P. No.2 in the admission matter on her present and correct address by registered post with A/D as well as by ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week from the date of this order, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. Rule is made returnable in the admission matter by six weeks. Police will not arrest the petitioner, namely, Shanti Choudhary in connection with C/1 Case No. 659 of 2012, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur, till 05.11.2012. Learned counsel for the petit...
Ambika Prasad Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6295 of 2012. --- Ambika Prasad Sahu ... ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... ... ... ... Opposite Party. --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Deomani, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. P.K. Sahai, Additional Public Prosecutor. --- 02. 01.09.2012. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody with effect from 23.06.2012. He further submits that the petitioner is neither owner nor Director nor employee of M/s. Krishna Fuel Hard Coke Plant, therefore, cannot be connected for the storage of coal found in the said company. On the other hand, Mr. P.K. Sahai, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State, submits that although till date papers could not be examined to find out as to whether the petitioner is owner or director or employee of the company. However, some of the persons have made st...
Sakir Ansari Alias Faujdari Mian Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.6239of2012 SakirAnsari@FaujdariMian Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty ----- CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ----- ForthePetitioner :Mr.ArbindKumarChoudhary,Advocate FortheState :Mr.KrishnaShankar,A.P.P. FortheComplainant :02. 01.09.2012 Presentapplicationismovedseekingregularbailinconnectionwith DeogharTownP.S.CaseNo.135of2012correspondingtoG.R.No.453of 2012registeredunderSection379oftheIndianPenalCode. AnF.I.R.waslodgedagainstunknownpersonbythecomplainantthat someone has stolen his Hero Honda Splendor Motorcycle. Petitioner is apprehended in another case, wherein he has allegedly confessed to have stolen the motorcycle of the complainant. Petitioner was arrested on 07.05.2012andisinjudicialcustodysincethen. Learnedcounselforthepetitioneraswellaslearnedcounselforthe Statehavesubmittedthatinthepresentcase,chargesheethasalreadybeen submitted. Learnedcounselforthepetitionersubmitsthatmotorcycleinquestion hasneverbeenrecoveredfrom...
Sikandar Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5560 of 2012 ------ Sikandar Ansari . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Gautam Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 01.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 192 of 2012 corresponding to G.R No. 342 of 2012 for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. From the F.I.R., it appears that the petitioner was apprehended along-with other co-accused persons and stolen mobile phones were recovered from them. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Sikandar Ansari is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M....
Vijay Uraon Alias Vijayanand Bhagat Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2483 of 2012 Vijay Uraon @ Vijayanand Bhagat ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajan Raj, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 03/01.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 33 of the Indian Forest Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he was cleaning the bush in the forest area within the plot No.435. It is contended that the petitioner is the owner of the plot No. 436 and he was not cleaning any part of the plot No. 435, but he was cleaning the part of the plot No.436. He has further submitted that the authority concerned has not made any measurement of the area of the plot numbers to verify whether the petitioner has actually clean...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »