Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shilendra Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Shilendra Sahu vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 01, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971671

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shilendra Sahu

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a no.5583 of 2012 ------ shilendra sahu . petitioner -versus- the state of jharkhand ..... opposite party ------ coram : the honble mr. justice h.c.mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr.s.k.vishwakarma, advocate. for the state : a.p.p. ------ 3/ 01.09.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the state. the petitioner has been made accused in gumla p.s. case no. 94 of 2011 corresponding to g.r no. 289 of 2011, s.t case no.238 of 2011 for the offence under sections 302, 387 / 34 of the indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act. in view of the direct allegation against the petitioner to have fired pistol, causing the death of the deceased, the bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by order dated 30.1.2012 in b.a no. 9454 of 2011. learned counsel for the petitioner has renewed the prayer for bail, submitting that the other co-accused has been granted bail. in the facts of this case, i am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, shilendra sahu is, hereby, rejected. (h.c.mishra, j.) b.s/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5583 of 2012 ------ Shilendra Sahu . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Vishwakarma, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 01.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Gumla P.S. Case No. 94 of 2011 corresponding to G.R No. 289 of 2011, S.T Case No.238 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 302, 387 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In view of the direct allegation against the petitioner to have fired pistol, causing the death of the deceased, the bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by order dated 30.1.2012 in B.A No. 9454 of 2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner has renewed the prayer for bail, submitting that the other co-accused has been granted bail. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, Shilendra Sahu is, hereby, rejected. (H.C.Mishra, J.) B.S/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial