Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms Victor Mining Industries Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
L.P.A. No. 350 o02. 17.09.2012 As prayed for, put up this case after four weeks. (Prakash Tatia, C.J) (Jaya Roy, J.) Alankar/-...
Alhak HussaIn Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.814of2012 AlhakHussain. ... ... ... ... ... ...Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Fatima Khatoon. ... ... ... ... ... ...Opp. Parties CORAM: THEHONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioner: Mr.R.S.Mazumdar,Sr,Advocate. FortheState: A.P .P. 09/17.09.2012 CallforthecasediaryofBokaroSteelCityP .S.CaseNo.454of 2011, corresponding to G.R.No. 1602 of 2011 from the Court of the Chief JudicialMagistrate,Bokaroandputupthiscaseafterreceiptofthesame. Inthemeantime,interimordergrantedearliershallcontinue. [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S....
Brindaban Singh Vs. M.D. B.S City Bokaro and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1380 of 2007 --- Brindaban Singh --- --- --- Petitioner Versus Managing Director, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro & others --- ---- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. G.M. Mishra, Advocate --- I.A. No. 2541/2012 4/ 17.09.2012 By this interlocutory application, petitioner seeks to implead Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) as party respondent in this case, though the officials representing the Bokaro Steel Plant, a Unit of the SAIL, has already been impleaded as party respondents in the main writ application. For the reasons stated in the I.A., counsel for the petitioner is allowed to implead the Steel Authority of India Limited as respondent no. 6 in this writ application. I.A. is disposed of. WPC No. 1380/2007 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the order dated 03.12.2005 pas...
Maksud Alam Khan ? Maksud Alam and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.606 o1. Maksud Alam Khan @ Maksud Alam 2. Salma Bibi 3. Sheikh Azim Rasul @ Azim Rasul 4. Firoj Ahmed 5. Sakina Khatoon @ Shakina Bibi 6. Naushad Ahmed Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. J.S. Singh, Advocate For the State : Miss Anita Sinha, APP. For the O. P. No.2 : Mr. A.K. Sinha, Advocate ----- 08/17.09.2012: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, State and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Party No.2. Order dated 25.01.2008 passed in Complaint Case No.558 of 2007 whereby and whereunder, the then learned Judicial Magistrate, Daltonganj, took cognizance of the offence against these petitioners under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, is being sought to be quashed on the ground that entire allegations levelled against these petitioners are quite vague and that so far accused Nos.4,5, and 6 are concerned, they...
Naresh Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
L.P.A. No. 261 o06. 17.09.2012 As prayed for, put up this case after four weeks. (Prakash Tatia, C.J) (Jaya Roy, J.) Alankar/-...
Suresh Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1071 of 2010 Suresh Mishra Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. I. Sinha, Advocate For the State : APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate ----- 09/17.09.2012: As prayed for on behalf of the Opp. Party No.2, put up this case on 24.09.2012. It is made clear that if by that time, counter affidavit is not filed, the matter shall be decided on the basis of the material available on the record. Till then, interim order passed on 28.09.2010 shall continue. (R.R. Prasad, J.) Ravi/...
M/S Magma Leasing Ltd Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1135 of 2008 M/s Magma Leasing Ltd. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. I. Sinha, Advocate For the State : APP For the Opp. Party No.2 : Mr. PAS Pati, Advocate ----- 03/17.09.2012: Office has pointed out that requisitions have been filed after peremptory order got expired, but at the same time, it has also been noted that no formal order could be recorded of rejection of the application. However, in the meantime, Opp. Party No.2 appeared by filing power. Under the circumstances, this application is being entertained. Initially, this application was filed for quashing of the order dated 10.07.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-F.T.C-I, Dhanbad in Criminal Revision No.115 of 2008 whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge, affirmed the order dated 01.05.2008 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, in Dhanba...
Ravi Ranjan Paswan Alias Vikky Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5734 of 2012 ------ Ravi Ranjan Paswan @ Vikky . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Bhandariya P.S Case No.47 of 2010 corresponding to G.R Case No.1405 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 364, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the F.I.R, it appears that the case relates to murder of the daughter of the informant and it is alleged that she had gone along-with the petitioner and the other co-accused persons. Subsequently, after about 12 days, the dead body of the deceased was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and except the allegation of last seen, t...
Dinanath Sahu Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No. 4917 of 2007 Dinanath Sahu Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ......... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. R.A. Choubey For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C. III ----------- I.A. NO. 1041 o06. /17.09.2012 By way of this interlocutory application, the applicant seeks substitution of sole deceased petitioner, who died on 23. 12.2009. Name of the persons to be substituted are indicated in para 3 of the said interlocutory application, who are the sons of the deceased petitioner claiming themselves to be his legal heirs. Counsel for the respondents does not object to the prayer. In the circumstance, the persons named in para 3 of the interlocutory application be substituted in place of the deceased petitioner by carrying out necessary correction on the part of the applicant in red ink in the writ petition as well as in all other relevant places during the course of th...
Amanat HussaIn Ansari and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 975 of 2012 ------ 1. Amanat Hussain Ansari 2. Abdul Mannan Ansari ... ...... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Farida Parveen .... ... .... ... Opp. Parties ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY ------ For the Petitioners : M/s. Ananda Sen, Nagmani Tiwari, Advocates For the State : A.P.P. For the Complainant : Mr. B.N. Jha, Advocate ----- 09 /17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from the complaint that the complainant-Farida Parveen was subjected to torture and treated with cruelty for want of cash of Rs.50,000/-. It is alleged in the complaint that just after one and half year of the marriage, the torture commenced on her. It is submitted that this case has been lodged after thirteen years of marriage with the false allegation. Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently argued and opposed...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »