Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 17 of about 750 results (0.020 seconds)Sunny Nagpal @ Sunny Ramesh Nagpal vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 22, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1021/2019 SUNNY NAGPAL @ SUNNY RAMESH NAGPAL........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prateek Prabhakar, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Lakhan Singh Mr. Gaurav Saini, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1236/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC registered at police station Vijay Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 26th May, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Lakhan Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been a...
Tag this Judgment!North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.workmen Working as Malies in Hort ...
Court: Delhi
$~4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA. 109/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Date of Judgment:22. d February, 2019 Through Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advocates. Dr. Ashoka Kumar, CMO, HQ North DMC. versus WORKMEN WORKING AS MALIES IN HORTICULTURE DEPTT. MCD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Ghose, Ms. Meghna-De & Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellant/NDMC has filed the present appeal with a prayer to set aside the judgment dated 25.09.2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in a writ petition being W.P. (C) 5034/2011 filed by the respondent wherein challenge was laid to the award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Industrial Adjudicator wherein directions were issued entitling the petitioners to Hospital Patient Care Allowance (in short HPCA) with ...
Tag this Judgment!Anuj Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 354/2019 ANUJ SINGH versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Ravinder Kumar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.61/2018 under Sections 379/392/397/411/506/120-B of the IPC, Police Station Jama Masjid.2. The subject FIR has been registered on the complaint of an employee of Sanjay Sales Agency.3. As per the complainant, he was instructed by the owner to transport goods and money in a van from their shop at Fateh Puri, Delhi to the factory at Patparganj, Delhi. It is alleged that the complainant had put four boxes in the back of the van containing BAIL APPLN. 354/2019 Page 1 of 4 goods and Rs. 15 lakhs in cash. As per the complainant after putt...
Tag this Judgment!Vipin Kumar Saini vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 214/2004 IN THE MATTER OF: Reserved on:11. 12.2018 Date of decision:22. 2.2019 VIPIN KUMAR SAINI STATE GAURI SHANKAR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Advocate with appellant in person. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State. Inspector Ravi Shankar, SHO/Lodhi Colony Inspector Suhaib Ahmad, SHO/Badar Pur. ASI Tulli Ram, P.S. Badar Pur AND CRL.A. 643/2004 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Janender Kumar Chumbak, Advocate with Ms. Radhika, Ms. Rishu and Mr. Madhav, Advocates. versus STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State. Inspector Ravi Shankar, SHO/Lodhi Colony Inspector Suhaib Ahmad, SHO/Badar Pur. ASI Tulli Ram, P.S. Badar Pur CRL.A.214/2004, 643/2004 & 680/2004 Page 1 of 31 LILAWATI DEVI STATE CRL.A. 680/2004 Through: Mr. Janender Kumar Chumbak, Advocate with Ms. Radhika, Ms. Rishu and Mr. Madhav, Advocates. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Thro...
Tag this Judgment!Onyx Therapeutics, Inc. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 02.2019 Pronounced on:22. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 5022/2017 & CM APPLN. 21659/2017 ONYX THERAPEUTICS, INC. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Dutt and Ms. Gunjan Hans, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. J.Sai Deepak, Mr. Afzal B. Khan and Mr. Eashan Ghosh, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 The present petition is preferred for quashing the impugned orders dated 12.05.2017 and 11.04.2017 passed by the respondent No.2 and restore the order dated April 10, 2017. Consequently, enable the petitioner to cross- examine Dr. Surajit Sinha and Dr. Prachi Tiwari prior to a final hearing on merits in the Section 25(2), Patents Act proceeding initiated by the respondent No.3 against Patent No.255964. W.P.(C) 5022/2017 Page 1 of 28 2. Further seeks direction thereby directing the respondent No.2 ...
Tag this Judgment!Rohit Kumar Aggarwal vs.govt. Of n.c.t. Of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 22, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4623/2018 & CRL.M.A. 1170/2019 ROHIT KUMAR AGGARWAL Through: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate .....Petitioner versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor with SI Rajesh Kumar Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.288/2018, under Sections 406/4of IPC registered at police station Mehrauli, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 13th August, 2018 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by her counsel as well as by SI Rajesh Kumar on the ba...
Tag this Judgment!C & S Electric Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Industries & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6231/2013 and CM APPL. 9164/2017 C & S ELECTRIC LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr K. Datta, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Abhinav Singh and Mohd. Kaisar Ansari, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2202.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a 1. communication dated 11.10.2013 issued by respondent No.2 (DSIDC Maintenance Services), inter alia, stating that the petitioner is obliged to pay 50% of the unearned increase for mutation/transfer of the property bearing No.222, Okhla Industrial Estate, Ph-III, New Delhi 100020 (hereafter the Property).2. The petitioner is a company and states that there is no transfer of the property or any significant change in its shareholding warranting the imposition of unearned increase.3. Briefly stated, the relevant facts necessary to address the aforesaid controversy ar...
Tag this Judgment!Satish Kumar Rana vs.ram Singh & Ors (United India Insurance Company L ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d February, 2019 $~17 * % + MAC.APP. 18/2018 1. SATISH KUMAR RANA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate. versus RAM SINGH & ORS (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Mirza Amir Baig, Advocate for Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate for DTC Mr.Sankar N. Sinha, Advocate for United India Insurance Co. Ltd. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award dated 21st September, 2017 whereby the Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim petition on the ground that the appellant failed to prove that he suffered injuries due to rash and negligent driving of respondent No.1.2. On 05th February, 2011, the appellant was repairing the clutch of bus bearing No.DL-1PB-5412 when respondent No.1 turned on the ignition and moved the bus due to which the right hand of the appellant came in the moving engine which resulted grievous crush injuries. The appellant was removed to G.T.B. Hospital where the appel...
Tag this Judgment!Sayaed Md. Ridwan @ Munna vs.state
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 22, 2019 + CRL.A. 785/2014 SAYAED MD. RIDWAN @ MUNNA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy, Delhi High Court Legal Services Committees Panel Advocate, Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik and Mr.Braham Kumar, Advocates Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public + CRL.A. 1235/2014 Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Vikram Singh 1. GULZAR SHEIKH @ SONU & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy, Delhi High Court Legal Services Committees Panel Advocates Versus STATE Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Vikram Singh ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned two appeals pertain to one incident and are directed against judgment of 17th April, 2014 vide which appellants have been convicted for the offence under Section 20(C) of the Narcotic Drugs CRL.As.785/2014 & 1235/2014 Page 1 of 8 and P...
Tag this Judgment!Sanno & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 152/2019 & C.M. Nos. 3981-82/2019 Decided on :22. 02.2019 SANNO & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Shikha Sapra, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with SI Rajpal, P.S. Khyala, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The complainant (petitioner No.1), her sister (petitioner No.2) and her brother-in-law (petitioner No.3) have filed the present petition seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 07.6.2018 passed by learned ASJ, Special Judge (NDPS), West District, Tis Hazari, Delhi, in SC No.57817/2016, arising out of FIR No.144/2010 P.S. Khyala, Delhi whereunder the respondents No.2 to 6 have been acquitted of the offence under Sections 307/3IPC.2. We may note at the outset that earlier hereto, aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment dated 07.6.2018, the State had preferred Crl. L.P. No.6...
Tag this Judgment!