Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 13 of about 750 results (0.019 seconds)Jasveen Kaur vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 25, 2019 + + + + + + + CRL.M.C. 3734/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28743/2018 CRL.M.C. 3735/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28747/2018 CRL.M.C. 3736/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28750/2018 CRL.M.C. 3737/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28753/2018 CRL.M.C. 3738/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28756/2018 CRL.M.C. 3739/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28759/2018 CRL.M.C. 3765/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28838/2018 SUDHIR CHADHA NARENDER SINGH SUDESH JAIN RAJAT JAIN K L BAJAJ ANIL KUMAR SHARMA JASVEEN KAUR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravinder Kr. Yadav and Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Advocates Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Sachin Datta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deeptanshu Jain, and Mr. Arpit Dewidi, Advocates for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.C. 1967/2017 and connected matters Page 1 of 4 ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned seven petitions, challen...
Tag this Judgment!Kanwal Kant Chagti vs.hotel Queen Road Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~CP-31 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 02.2019 + CO.PET. 148/2012 KANWAL KANT CHAGTI HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT LTD versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Present: Mr.Amardeep Singh and Ms.Shruti Khosla, Advs. for the petitioner. Mr.Jayant K.Mehta and Mr.Harshit Agarwal, Advs. for the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This petition is filed under section 439 read with sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent company. The case of the petitioner in the winding up petition is that in the year 2007 on the request of the respondent, the petitioner extended a loan to the respondent for a sum of Rs.49,07,663/-. The said payments were made vide cheques in March 2007. It is the case of the petitioner that the cheques were duly honoured and the said amounts were duly credited in the bank account of the respondent. It was also orally agreed that the respondent will pay interes...
Tag this Judgment!Dinesh Aggarwal & Ors vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h February, 2019 % + FAO(OS) 19/2019, CM Nos. 4034-4036/2019 DINESH AGGARWAL & ORS Through: Mr. Rajat Joseph, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.4035/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM No.4034/2019 (for condonation of 56 days delay in filing the appeal) For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 56 days in filing the appeal stands condoned. Application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 19/2019 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants challenging the order of the learned Single Judge dated September 04, 2018 passed FAO (OS) 19/2019 Page 1 of 7 in Test. Case No.95/2014 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed a petition filed under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in respect of Will d...
Tag this Judgment!Afilias India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :01. 02.2019 Pronounced on :25. 02.2019 W.P.(C)No.8886/2018 AFILIAS INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus . ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Kishore, Mr. Niraj Singh, Mr. Deepak Jaiswal and Ms. Atipra Aick, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Rakesh Munjal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Yashita Munjal and Mr. Yogesh Mittal, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the second respondent, the National Internet Exchange of India (hereafter NIXI), a not-for-profit organization incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act rejecting its tender/bid for Selection of Technical Service Provider for .IN Registry (hereafter the service).2. The Domain Name System ("DNS") acts as a phone book for the Internet by translating human-friendly names into internet addresses, i.e. it ...
Tag this Judgment!Liyakat Ali vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6549/2017 Through: Mr. S.N. Kaul, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus LIYAKAT ALI UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA Through: Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS % ORDER2502.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated 3rd June 2017 issued by the Senior Commandant (TRG), CISF in the office of the Director, National Industrial Security Academy (NISA), Hyderabad cancelling the provisional offer of appointment made to the... Petitioner as Sub Inspector (Exe) in the CISF.2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner applied for the post of SI (Exe) in the CISF and took the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) Examination, 2015. Upon being successful in the examination, he was issued a letter dated 15th September 2016 by Respondent No.5 provisionally appointing him as SI Executive in the CISF subject to character and antecedent verificat...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Ran Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:25thFebruary, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3191/2015 SH. RAN SINGH S/o Late Sh. Maan Singh ...Petitioner Through: Ms. Smita Maan, Advocate versus with Mr. Paritosh Tomar and Mr. Satyavan Rathi, Advocates.1. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through Divisional Commissioner 5, Sham Nath Marg, New Delhi 2. SH. AJIT SINGH S/o Late Sh. Maan Singh 3. SH. KRISHAN KUMAR S/o Late Sh. Maan Singh 4. M/s CURIOCITY INFOTECH PVT. LTD. Through its Director Sh. Ankkush Gupta C-216, Sarvodya Enclave, New Delhi-110017 5. SH. RITESH KUMAR S/o Sh. Krishan Kumar 6. SH. MANOJ KUMAR S/o Sh. Krishan Kumar 7. SH. RAJEEV DHAIYA S/o Sh. Ajeet Singh 8. SH. DINESH S/o Sh. Ajeet Singh ...Respondents Through: Mr. Upender Thakur, Advocate with Mr. Saarthak Khanna, Advocate for R-2, R-3 & R-5 to R-8. W.P.(C) 3191/2015 Page 1 of 7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The petitioner is challenging the legality and validity of following three orders: a. Ord...
Tag this Judgment!E. Virendra Pandey vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~46. * + % W.P.(C) 1893/2019 E. VIRENDRA PANDEY IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25.02.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. C. Mohan Rao with Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jinesh Tiwari, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.8839/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1893/2019 & C.M. No.8838/2019 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 08.02.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) W.P.(C.) No.1893/2019 Page 1 of 5 in O.A. No.421/2019. The said Original Application preferred by the petitioner to assail his transfer from Delhi to Behrampur, has been rejected by the Tribunal. The... Petitioner is an Executive Engineer serving in the CPWD. Prior to the issuance of the order of transfer dated 03.01.2019, he was serving...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Nayyar vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 25, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1073/2019 & Crl.M.A. 4261/2019 RAJESH NAYYAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Thakur, Advcocate Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with ASI Praveen Kumar Mr. Anil Kumar Thakur, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.414/2011, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Hari Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 21st February, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by ASI Praveen Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute Crl.M.C. 107...
Tag this Judgment!Sudesh Jain vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 25, 2019 + + + + + + + CRL.M.C. 3734/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28743/2018 CRL.M.C. 3735/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28747/2018 CRL.M.C. 3736/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28750/2018 CRL.M.C. 3737/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28753/2018 CRL.M.C. 3738/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28756/2018 CRL.M.C. 3739/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28759/2018 CRL.M.C. 3765/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28838/2018 SUDHIR CHADHA NARENDER SINGH SUDESH JAIN RAJAT JAIN K L BAJAJ ANIL KUMAR SHARMA JASVEEN KAUR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravinder Kr. Yadav and Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Advocates Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Sachin Datta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deeptanshu Jain, and Mr. Arpit Dewidi, Advocates for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.C. 1967/2017 and connected matters Page 1 of 4 ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned seven petitions, challen...
Tag this Judgment!Pradeep Kumar vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~F-72 * + TEST.CAS. 12/2009 PRADEEP KUMAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pravir Kumar Jain, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Through Mr.Amit Punj and Mr.Archit Arora, Advocates for R-2. ......... RESPONDENTS % Date of Decision:25. h February, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, for grant of probate in respect of Will dated 30th December, 1996, of late Shri Dwij Kumar Shastri, father of the petitioner and respondents Nos.2 to 5.2. In the petition, it has been averred that Shri Dwij Kumar Shastri son of Sh. Thakur Mangal Sainji expired on 08th April, 1997. It is averred that Shri Dwij Kumar Shastri during his lifetime had executed his last and final Will dated 30th December, 1996, which was duly registered. It was mentioned in the Will, that it shall come into effect TEST.CAS.12/2009 Page 1 of 11 only after the death of the testator a...
Tag this Judgment!