Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 15 of about 750 results (0.008 seconds)Punit Beriwala vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:25. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2151/2016, CRL. M.A. 20402/2017 & CRL. M.A. 20403/2017 PUNIT BERIWALA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Salman Khurshid, Senior Advocate with Mr. Puneet Singal, Ms. Ayesha Jamal, Mr.Lokendra Malik and Mr. Vijay Shankar, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, Addl. P.P. for the State. Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin with Mr. Tejasvi Kumar, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J1 The petitioner had sought anticipatory bail. Interim protection was granted to him earlier. The petitioner is being investigated in C.C. No.72/1/2014 under section 420 IPC pending with P.S. Economic Offences Wing.2. The allegations are that one Smt. Damayanti Devi had agreed to purchase Flat No.D-7, Tower-B, at Property No.6, Auribindo Marg, New Delhi, with M/s. Vipul Infrastructure Developers Ltd., for a sale consideration of Rs.1,73,02,000/- (one ...
Tag this Judgment!Karmveer vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 25, 2019 + + + CRL.M.C. 1967/2017 and CRL.M.As. 8099/2017 & 17607/2017 CRL.M.C. 2429/2017 and CRL.M.As. 9834-9835/2017 & CRL.M.A. 1234/2018 CRL.M.C. 2430/2017 and CRL.M.As. 9836-9837/2017 & CRL.M.A. 1237/2018 NARENDRA BANSAL ARUP CHATTERJJEE KARMVEER Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Shah, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumer Singh Boparai and Mr. Shadman A. Siddiqui for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The question posed in these petitions is whether the revisional court while setting aside order dismissing application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., can remand the matter back to trial court without hearing the accused/suspect. With the consent of learned Senior Counsel for the parties, the above captioned three petit...
Tag this Judgment!Moser Baer Solar Limited vs.ministry of Electronics & Information Tech ...
Court: Delhi
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1876/2019 % MOSER BAER SOLAR LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Kamal Mehta, Advocate. versus MINISTRY OF ELECTRONICS & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ..... Respondent Through: Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Ms Seerat Deep Singh, Ms Nidhi Mohan Parashar, GP and Mr Sharma, Advocates. Pratyush CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER2502.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM No.8791/2019 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1876/2019 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a letter dated 15.01.2019 (hereafter the impugned letter) issued by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (the respondent). Further, the petitioner prays that this Court issue directions to the respondent to disburse the subsidy amounting to 269,70,00,000/- to the petitioner. W.P.(C) 1876 of 2019 Page 1 of 10 3. The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is, inter alia, involved in the ma...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak Rao & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 25, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1080/2019 & Crl.M.As. 4272/2019 & 4273/2019 DEEPAK RAO & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocate Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Virender Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1092/2015, under Sections 498A/406/4IPC, registered at police station K.N.Katju Marg, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated Settlement Agreement of 27th July, 2017 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Virender Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between...
Tag this Judgment!Narender Singh vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 25, 2019 + + + + + + + CRL.M.C. 3734/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28743/2018 CRL.M.C. 3735/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28747/2018 CRL.M.C. 3736/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28750/2018 CRL.M.C. 3737/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28753/2018 CRL.M.C. 3738/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28756/2018 CRL.M.C. 3739/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28759/2018 CRL.M.C. 3765/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28838/2018 SUDHIR CHADHA NARENDER SINGH SUDESH JAIN RAJAT JAIN K L BAJAJ ANIL KUMAR SHARMA JASVEEN KAUR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravinder Kr. Yadav and Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Advocates Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Sachin Datta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deeptanshu Jain, and Mr. Arpit Dewidi, Advocates for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.C. 1967/2017 and connected matters Page 1 of 4 ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned seven petitions, challen...
Tag this Judgment!Narendra Bansal vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 25, 2019 + + + CRL.M.C. 1967/2017 and CRL.M.As. 8099/2017 & 17607/2017 CRL.M.C. 2429/2017 and CRL.M.As. 9834-9835/2017 & CRL.M.A. 1234/2018 CRL.M.C. 2430/2017 and CRL.M.As. 9836-9837/2017 & CRL.M.A. 1237/2018 NARENDRA BANSAL ARUP CHATTERJJEE KARMVEER Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Shah, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumer Singh Boparai and Mr. Shadman A. Siddiqui for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The question posed in these petitions is whether the revisional court while setting aside order dismissing application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., can remand the matter back to trial court without hearing the accused/suspect. With the consent of learned Senior Counsel for the parties, the above captioned three petit...
Tag this Judgment!Spentex Industries Ltd. Vs.louis Dreyfus Commodities India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. h January, 2019 Date of decision :22. d February, 2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 174/2017 SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Mr. Arun Arora and Ms. Preeti Thakur, Advocates. (M:9810166612) versus LOUIS DREYFUS COMMODITIES INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Virendra Rawat, Mr. Ramesh, Mr. Kamal Kapoor and Mr. Vinayak Advocates. (M:9810127729) Bhatta, CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present Section 34 petition arises out of the impugned award dated 21st December, 2012 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by the Cotton Association of India (hereinafter the CAI), by a 2:1 majority, as also order dated 23rd September, 2013 passed by the Board of Directors of the CAI, dismissing the appeal filed by of the... Petitioner, with costs. A preliminary issue as to the maintainability of the present petition has been raise...
Tag this Judgment!P C Jeweller Ltd vs.national Insurance Company Limited
Court: Delhi
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1007/2016 P C JEWELLER LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Roshan Santhala, Adv. versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Mr. Udit Grover & ..... Defendant Mr. Yogesh Malhotra, Advs. SI Surender Kumar, PS Mayapuri. ORDER2202.2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % IAs No.13702/2018(u/O.XI R5(1) CPC as applicable to Commercial Suits r/w Section 151 CPC & 13703/2018(u/S.65A of Indian Evidence Act filed by plaintiff) 1. The counsel for the plaintiff/applicant has been heard.2. The counsel for the plaintiff/applicant has argued (I) that the plaintiff, along with the plaint has filed its office copies of the documents, listed at serial no.(i) to (xiv) of para 2 of IA No.13702/2018 and originals of which were sent by the plaintiff to the defendant; (II) that the defendant, at the stage of admission/denial of documents, denied all the said office copies; (III) that the plaintiff, in examination-in-chief of its witnes...
Tag this Judgment!Bharti Infratel Limited vs.lineage Power Private Limited
Court: Delhi
$~9,12&13 * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 792/2017 & IAs No.13480/2017 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 15260/2017 (u/S8of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996) PACE POWER SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa, Mr. Vipul Kumar, Mr. Bhargav R. Thali and Ms. Mishika Bajpai, Advs. Versus BHARTI INFRATEL LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Rohit Aggarwal and Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 920/2018 & IAs No.7678/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 11631/2018 (u/S58 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996), 11632/2018 (of defendant u/O VII R-11 CPC) & 16190/2018 (for consolidation of suits) BHARTI INFRATEL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Sharthak Mannan and Ms. Kanika Mitra, Advs. LINEAGE POWER PRIVATE LIMITED Versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa, Mr. Vipul Kumar, Mr. Bhargav R. Thali and Ms. Mishika Bajpai, Advs. CS(COMM) 1158/2...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Kumar Chauhan & Ors vs.the State (Nct) Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 22, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1019/2019 and CRL.M.A.s 4053-4054/2019 MUKESH KUMAR CHAUHAN & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R.C. Sharma, Advocate Versus THE STATE (NCT) DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Inderpal Singh Ms. Shilpi Singhal, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.24/2012, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC registered at police station Madhu Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 14th September, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Inderpal Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that t...
Tag this Judgment!