Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Santosh Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2018
$~R-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on :-"19th November, 2018 CRL.A. 28/2018 SANTOSH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate with Mr. Pallavi Sharma Kansal, & Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocates / DHCLSC versus Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP ..... Respondent STATE for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Appellant Santosh Kumar stood trial in Sessions Case (No.58634/2016) in the court of Special Judge (POCSO Act) on the basis of report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) submitted upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.803/2015 of Police Station Alipur and, by judgment dated 30.10.2017, he was held guilty and convicted on the charge for offences punishable under Section 376(2)(i) of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). By order dated 31.10.2017, the trial court has awarded rigoro...
Ankit Rathore vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2018
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 2399/2018 Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2018 ANKIT RATHORE versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Raj Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1911.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.30/2018 under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC, Police Station Gandhi Nagar. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased.2. The allegations against the petitioner in the FIR are that the petitioner and his family used to harass the deceased for not bringing enough dowry and for giving birth to two girls. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner Page 1 of 3 3. BAIL APPLN. 2399/2018 has been falsely implicated. He submits that the allegations are vague and there is no insta...
Saleem Alias Gama & Anr. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 443/2003 IN THE MATTER OF: SALEEM alias GAMA & ANR. ..... Appellants 30.10.2018 Reserved on: Date of decision:19. 11.2018 Through: Ms. Naina Kejriwal and Ms. Soumava Karmakar, Advocates versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State ..... Respondent HIMA KOHLI, J.1. This appeal has been filed by two appellants assailing the judgment dated 30.05.2003 and order on sentence dated 31.05.2003, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi convicting them under Section 3IPC and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default thereof, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 08.04.1990, at 7:45 AM, the duty constable of Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Hospital (LNJP) had telephonically informed that one Bilal, son of Sirajuddin aged 24 y...
Fahimuddin vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2018
$~45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 11.2018 W.P.(C) 11712/2018 and CM No.47921/2018 FAHIMUDDIN ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Sangita Bhayana, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Abha Malhotra and Mr. Abhishek Kamal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice to the respondents.2. Ms. Abha Malhotra, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.3. With the consent of counsel for the parties, this petition was heard finally.4. The petitioner had sought quashing of an order which required deposit of `2,75,000/- as redemption fine; `1,00,000/- as penalty and `2,21,547/- (i.e. 38.5%) as customs duty. The imposition of these liabilities was on account of a quantity of goods imported by the petitioner. Although the nature of the relief claimed was wide, after obtaining instructions, learned counsel submitted that the liability is no...
Sanjay Kumar Bhambri vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2018
$- * % + W.P.(C) No.6284/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:25. 10.2018 Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2018 SANJAY KUMAR BHAMBRI ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. L.S. Chaudhary, Mr. D.S. Chaudhary, Mr. Ajay Chaudhary and Mr. Parambir Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. with Mr. Shashwat Sharma and Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advs. For UOI. Ms. Rachana Joshi Issar and Ms. Vandana Mishra, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition to assail the order dated 18.02.2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.91/2010. By the impugned order, the Tribunal dismissed the said original application preferred by the petitioner. W.P.(C.) No.6284/2014 Page 1 of 10 2. The said original application had been preferred by the petitioner to s...
M/S Tamil Nadu Waste Management Ltd. Vs.delhi State Industrial and Inf ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2018
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 11544/2018 & CM Appl. Nos. 44676-44677/2018 M/S TAMIL NADU WASTE MANAGEMENT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Mr. Matrugupta Mishra, Ms. Aastha Chawla & Mr. Karthik Sunder Advocates versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (DSIIDC) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan & Ms. Nikita Salwan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN (OPEN COURT) % 1. This writ petition concerns a Notice Inviting Tenders (NIT No.2/17-18) issued by the Respondent for Development of Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility for Hazardous Waste on Build, Own, Transfer basis at Bawana, Delhi (hereafter, the NIT). The... Petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of its bid on the ground that it has not complied with the technical specifications of the tender.2. The undisputed facts are these: The ...
Anup Singh vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2018
$~14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"19th November, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2742/2016 and Crl.M.A.11728/2016 (stay) ANUP SINGH Through: Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate ........ Petitioner with petitioner in person. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with ASI Tej Prakash, PS Kirti Nagar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 28.06.2010. On 17.11.2011, she lodged first information report (FIR) no.354/2011 with police station Kirti Nagar alleging offences punishable under Section 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband, the petitioner. On conclusion of the investigation, police filed a report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on which cognizance was taken, the said matter being pending on the file of the Met...
Mandeep Singh vs.santosh Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2018
$~15 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19. h November, 2018 + MAT.APP(F.C.) 49/2018 & CM Nos. 8427/2018, 8429/2018 MANDEEP SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Singh, Advocate along SANTOSH SHARMA ..... Respondent with appellant in person versus Through: Mr. Pankaj Jaiswal, Advocate along with respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPLS. No.8429/2018 (delay of 651 days) & MAT.APP(F.C.) 49/2018 1. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 of CPC seeking condonation of 651 days delay in filing the present appeal. The reasons for the delay find mentioned in para 3 of the application which we reproduce below:-"3. That after passing of the impugned order dated 01.04.2016 the appellant filed a Review Petition titled as Mandeep Singh Versus Santosh Sharma before the Ld. Principal Judge wherein the pleadings were complete however the same dis...
Abhishek Gupta vs.the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1806/2017 ABHISHEK GUPTA THE STATE NCT OF DELHI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr.Plash, Advocate Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Rampal, P.S.Mehrauli CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1911.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.439 of 2017, under Sections 354/354-B/506 IPC, P.S.Mehrauli.2. The allegations in the FIR against the petitioner are that the petitioner on a false pretext of marriage had made physical relationship consequent to which an FIR has been registered in Gurgaon.... Petitioner is alleged to have sent obscene messages to the prosecutrix and also threatened her.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that parties were genuinely interested BAIL APP...
Shri Anil Kingrani vs.shri Vinod Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C.No.1808/2016 & CRL. M.A. 7671/2016 Judgment reserved on :08. 02.2018 Date of decision :19. 11.2018 SHRI ANIL KINGRANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek B. Saharya, Advocate versus SHRI VINOD KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner vide this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeks quashing of a complaint case No.04/4R/2016 under Sectionof the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and as per order dated 29.5.2015, the proceedings are stated to be pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-03, Rohini.2. A perusal of the record indicates that vide order dated 29.5.2015, the petitioner herein was summoned for an offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (as amended) on a complaint filed by the respondent herein unde...