Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri b.d. Sharma vs.swastik Infra Estate Private Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 11.2018 ARB.P. 94/2018 + SHRI B.D. SHARMA Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav with Ms. Ruchira, ........ Petitioner Advocates. versus SWASTIK INFRA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mukti Chaudhry with Ms. Manika Goswami and Ms. Tejaswini Chandra Shekhar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL) 1. This a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act). The petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitrator. 2 Broadly, the following facts and assertions need to be noticed to adjudicate upon the instant petition. 2.1 The petitioner appears to have booked a plot with an entity by the name: Ansal Hi-Tech Townships Ltd. (in short Ansals). The consideration for purchase of the plot was pegged at Rs.35 lakhs. 2.2 The obligations undertaken by the petitioner and Ansals are captured in an agreement dated 31.03.2012. ARB. P. N...
Kga Investments vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:20. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 9509/2018 & C.M. No.38741/2018 KGA INVESTMENTS versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: Mr Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate Adv. with Mr Kunal Vajani, Mr Kartik Nayar, Mr Paras Anand, Mr Mohit Mahla, Mr Prateek Rajodhanya & Mr Sarthak Sharma Ms Anjana Gosain, with Ms Shalini Nair & Ms Rabiya Thakur for R-1. Mr. Dig Vijay Rai, with Mr. Kustubh Singh for R-2. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the Minutes of the Meeting (hereafter the impugned decision) of the Appellate Committee for height clearance, of Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India (hereafter the Appellate Committee) held on 31.07.2018. The said minutes are impugned to the extent that the Appellate Committee has rejected the petitioners request f...
Budhan Khan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2018
$~R-11 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 684/2017 Judgment reserved on 31st October, 2018 Judgment pronounced on 20th, November, 2018 ....Appellant BUDHAN KHAN Through : Mr. Sumeet Verma and Ms. Preeti Jakhar, Advocates. Versus STATE ....Respondent Inspector Nar Singh, Police Station - Kanjhawala. Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. The present appeal under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.PC') challenges the judgment and order on sentence dated 30.03.2017 and 03.04.2017 respectively passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, North West District, Rohini, Delhi in Sessions Case No.51705/2016, FIR No.620/2014, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and Section 25/27/of Arms Act registered at Police Station - Kanjhawala whereby the appellan...
Tapan Kuamr Deo vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA522018 PRATAP SINGH AHLUWALIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manu Mridul and Mr.Navneet Tripathi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through:Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Aditya Goyal, Advocate. $~18 & 19 * + + LPA602018 TAPAN KUAMR DEO Through: Mr.Achintya Dwivedi Mr.B.P.Padhye, Advocates. ..... Appellant and versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr.Aditya Goyal, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT2011.2018 1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 2nd February, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petitions of the present Appellants who pleaded that the Appointments LPA Nos.52 of 2018& 60 of 2018 Page 1 of 19 Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) had committed an error in rejecting their candidature for appointment as Presiding Officers of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT)...
Cyfuture India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.amit Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: November 20, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5156/2018 & CMs 20030/2018 & 20032/2018 + W.P.(C) 5644/2018 & CMs 22038-39/2018 + W.P.(C) 5665/2018 & CMs 22065-66/2018 + W.P.(C) 5681/2018 & CMs 22114-15/2018 + W.P.(C) 5685/2018 & CMs 22120-21/2018 + W.P.(C) 5686/2018 & CMs 22122-23/2018 + W.P.(C) 5691/2018 & CMs 22135-36/2018 + W.P.(C) 5705/2018 & CMs 22164-65/2018 + W.P.(C) 5706/2018 & CMs 22166-67/2018 + W.P.(C) 5712/2018 & CMs 22173-74/2018 + W.P.(C) 5713/2018 & CMs 22175-76/2018 + W.P.(C) 5715/2018 & CMs 22179-80/2018 + W.P.(C) 5717/2018 & CMs 22182-86/2018 + W.P.(C) 5718/2018 & CMs 22185-86/2018 + W.P.(C) 5719/2018 & CMs 22188-89/2018 + W.P.(C) 5721/2018 & CMs 22192-93/2018 + W.P.(C) 5729/2018 & CMs 22237-38/2018 + W.P.(C) 5731/2018 & CMs 22241-42/2018 + W.P.(C) 5741/2018 & CMs 22267-68/2018 + W.P.(C) 5742/2018 & CMs 22269-70/2018 + W.P.(C) 5743/2018 & CMs 22272-73/2018 + W.P.(C) 5750/2018 & CMs 22301-02/2018 + W.P.(C) 5752/2018 & CMs 22303-04/...
Cyfuture India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.mirza Nafees Baig and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: November 20, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5156/2018 & CMs 20030/2018 & 20032/2018 + W.P.(C) 5644/2018 & CMs 22038-39/2018 + W.P.(C) 5665/2018 & CMs 22065-66/2018 + W.P.(C) 5681/2018 & CMs 22114-15/2018 + W.P.(C) 5685/2018 & CMs 22120-21/2018 + W.P.(C) 5686/2018 & CMs 22122-23/2018 + W.P.(C) 5691/2018 & CMs 22135-36/2018 + W.P.(C) 5705/2018 & CMs 22164-65/2018 + W.P.(C) 5706/2018 & CMs 22166-67/2018 + W.P.(C) 5712/2018 & CMs 22173-74/2018 + W.P.(C) 5713/2018 & CMs 22175-76/2018 + W.P.(C) 5715/2018 & CMs 22179-80/2018 + W.P.(C) 5717/2018 & CMs 22182-86/2018 + W.P.(C) 5718/2018 & CMs 22185-86/2018 + W.P.(C) 5719/2018 & CMs 22188-89/2018 + W.P.(C) 5721/2018 & CMs 22192-93/2018 + W.P.(C) 5729/2018 & CMs 22237-38/2018 + W.P.(C) 5731/2018 & CMs 22241-42/2018 + W.P.(C) 5741/2018 & CMs 22267-68/2018 + W.P.(C) 5742/2018 & CMs 22269-70/2018 + W.P.(C) 5743/2018 & CMs 22272-73/2018 + W.P.(C) 5750/2018 & CMs 22301-02/2018 + W.P.(C) 5752/2018 & CMs 22303-04/...
Cyfuture India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.savita and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: November 20, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5156/2018 & CMs 20030/2018 & 20032/2018 + W.P.(C) 5644/2018 & CMs 22038-39/2018 + W.P.(C) 5665/2018 & CMs 22065-66/2018 + W.P.(C) 5681/2018 & CMs 22114-15/2018 + W.P.(C) 5685/2018 & CMs 22120-21/2018 + W.P.(C) 5686/2018 & CMs 22122-23/2018 + W.P.(C) 5691/2018 & CMs 22135-36/2018 + W.P.(C) 5705/2018 & CMs 22164-65/2018 + W.P.(C) 5706/2018 & CMs 22166-67/2018 + W.P.(C) 5712/2018 & CMs 22173-74/2018 + W.P.(C) 5713/2018 & CMs 22175-76/2018 + W.P.(C) 5715/2018 & CMs 22179-80/2018 + W.P.(C) 5717/2018 & CMs 22182-86/2018 + W.P.(C) 5718/2018 & CMs 22185-86/2018 + W.P.(C) 5719/2018 & CMs 22188-89/2018 + W.P.(C) 5721/2018 & CMs 22192-93/2018 + W.P.(C) 5729/2018 & CMs 22237-38/2018 + W.P.(C) 5731/2018 & CMs 22241-42/2018 + W.P.(C) 5741/2018 & CMs 22267-68/2018 + W.P.(C) 5742/2018 & CMs 22269-70/2018 + W.P.(C) 5743/2018 & CMs 22272-73/2018 + W.P.(C) 5750/2018 & CMs 22301-02/2018 + W.P.(C) 5752/2018 & CMs 22303-04/...
Welspun Enterprises Ltd vs.ncc Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2018
$-31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h November, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 468/2018 WELSPUN ENTERPRISES LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sameer Parikh, Ms.Smita Bhardwaj, Ms.Tanya Chaudhary and Ms.Malvika Bhanot, Advs. NCC LTD versus Through: Ms.Priya Kumar, Mr.Adhish Srivastava, Mr.Tejas Chhabra, Mr.Anand Chichra & Mr.Sujit Kumar Singh, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) Cav.1057/2018 As the learned counsel for the respondent appears on advance notice, Caveat stands disposed of. I.A. No.15782/2018 This is an application seeking condonation of seven days delay in re-filing of the petition. For the reason stated in the application the delay is condoned and the application stands allowed. I.A. Nos.15780-81/2018 (Exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (COMM) 468/2018 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has bee...
In the Matter of Unocal Bharat Service Private Ltd. (In vol.liqn.) Vs. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2018
$~CP-17 * % + CO.PET. 47/2017 IN THE MATTER OF UNOCAL BHARAT SERVICE PRIVATE LTD. (IN VOL.LIQN.) ........ Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 11.2018 Through Mr.Kunal Sharma, Adv. for OL and Mr.Rajiv K. Nanda, Vol.Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a company petition, preferred under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956(herein referred to as the Act), by the Official Liquidator (OL). The prayer made in the petition is that the subject company i.e., UNOCAL BHARAT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED (herein referred to as the said company), may be wound up and finally dissolved from the date of the filing of the instant petition.2. The record shows that the said Company in issue was incorporated on 02.07.1998, vide registration No.094788, with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi and Haryana. The Corporate Identity Number of the said company is U65999DL1998PTC094788.3. The registered office of the s...
Dheeraj Sharma vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2018
$~49 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"20.11.2018 CRL.M.C. 5795/2018 & CRL.M.A. 47535/2018 DHEERAJ SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.R.M.Tufail with Mr.Farooq and Ms.Astha, Advs. versus STATE & ORS Through Mr.Mukesh Kumar, APP with Insp. Pankaj Arora, PS Crime Branch. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner hands over a bunch of additional documents, copies whereof have been provided to Mr.Mukesh Kumar, learned APP. The said documents are taken on record.2. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks modification of the conditions imposed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate while granting him bail vide order dated 24.05.2018.3. Before dealing with the rival contentions of the parties, it would be appropriate to refer to the conditions imposed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate while grating bail to the petitioner. The relevant portions of th...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »