Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagdish @ Jaggi vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 602/2003 RAJINDER KUMAR @ GANJA Through: Mr. Anupam Reserved on:16. h October, 2018 Decided on:1. t November, 2018 .....Appellant S.Sharma with Mr.Prakash Airan, Advocates. STATE versus .....Respondent Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. + CRL.A. 32/2004 RAJ KUMAR @ SUMAN .....Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma with Ms.Preeti Jakhar, Advocates. STATE versus .....Respondent Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. + JAGDISH @ JAGGI STATE OF DELHI .....Appellant CRL.A. 920/2015 Through: Mr.Anupam S.Sharma with versus Mr.Prakash Airan, Advocates. Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. .....Respondent Crl.A.602/2003 & connected appeals Page 1 of 36 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These are three appeals arising out of the same set of facts. Crl.A.602 of 2003 is by Rajinder Kumar @ Ganja (A-3) and Crl.A.32 of 2004 is by Raj Kumar @ Suman (Accused No.2: A-2) directed against the j...
Union of India vs.m/s Delhi Paper Products Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :12. h September, 2018 Date of decision :1st November, 2018 O.M.P. 1195/2012 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC and Mr. Bibhash Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Dinesh and Mr. Sunil, Official, Ministry Commerce. (M:9810373320) of versus M/S DELHI PAPER PRODUCTS PVT LTD. Apar Through: Mr. ..... Respondent Gupta, Advocate. (M:9873340111) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.The present petition challenges arbitration award dated 6th June, 2012 1. passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator. By the impugned award, the learned Arbitrator has declared the banning order dated 30th December, 2002, passed against the Respondent, by the Union of India (hereinafter Government), as withdrawn/cancelled and has also awarded damages for losses caused on account of the said banning order.2. The background of the dispute is that M/s. Delhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter Supplier) was awarded th...
Manu Markande and Anr vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : October 15, 2018 Judgment pronounced on: November 01, 2018 FAO(OS) 114/2016 AND CM APPL. 13061/2016 AJAY SHARMA & ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. versus MANU MARKANDE Through Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh and Ms.Savita, Advs. for R-2 & R-5. ..... Respondent FAO(OS) 190/2016 MANU MARKANDE AND ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh and Ms.Savita, Advs. versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. for R-3 & R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.These two appeals impugn the order dated 14.01.2016 1. passed by the learned Single Judge, partly allowing an application (IA No.21049/2014) seeking amendments in the FAO (OS) (COMM) 114/2016 & 190/2016 Page 1 of 11 reply/objections (written statement) filed Ajay Sharma, (appellant in FAO(OS) No.114/2016, hereaft...
Rajinder Kumar @ Ganja vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 602/2003 RAJINDER KUMAR @ GANJA Through: Mr. Anupam Reserved on:16. h October, 2018 Decided on:1. t November, 2018 .....Appellant S.Sharma with Mr.Prakash Airan, Advocates. STATE versus .....Respondent Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. + CRL.A. 32/2004 RAJ KUMAR @ SUMAN .....Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma with Ms.Preeti Jakhar, Advocates. STATE versus .....Respondent Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. + JAGDISH @ JAGGI STATE OF DELHI .....Appellant CRL.A. 920/2015 Through: Mr.Anupam S.Sharma with versus Mr.Prakash Airan, Advocates. Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. .....Respondent Crl.A.602/2003 & connected appeals Page 1 of 36 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These are three appeals arising out of the same set of facts. Crl.A.602 of 2003 is by Rajinder Kumar @ Ganja (A-3) and Crl.A.32 of 2004 is by Raj Kumar @ Suman (Accused No.2: A-2) directed against the j...
Mukesh Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2018
$~R-28 & 29 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 535/1999 Decided on:-"1st November, 2018 MUKESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Manav Puri, Advocate STATE versus Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Special PP ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 536/1999 with Mr. Philomon Kani, & Ms. Kriti Handa, Advocates SOMNATH Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. Manav Puri, Advocate versus STATE THROUGH CBI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Special PP with Mr. Philomon Kani, & Ms. Kriti Handa, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Both the appellants stood trial, separately, on the charge for the offence punishable under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS), on the basis of two separate reports (Sessions case Nos.13/1997 and 14/1997) arising out of first information report (FIR) of Central Bureau of Investigation Crl. Appeal No.535/1999 & 536/1999 Page 1 of 8...
M/S. Harcharan Dass Gupta Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs.mcd & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2018
$~J * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:01. 11. 2018 CS(OS) 607/2003 M/S. HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.V.K.Sharma, Adv. MCD & ANR. versus Through Mr.V.Gangotra, Adv. for MCD. .... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of declaration declaring the levy of compensation to the tune of Rs.20,61,637 by defendant No.2 as communicated to the plaintiff vide letter dated 2.1.2003 in respect of the work Construction of Pedestrian Sub Ways on Netaji Subhash Marg Opp.Red Fot as being illegal, void, unjust, improper and not binding on the plaintiff. A decree of permanent injunction is also sought to restrain the defendants from withholding or making a recovery of the said sum of Rs.20,61,637/-.2. The relevant facts are that the plaintiff is stated to be a company incorporated under the Companies Act and is eng...
Shoppers Stop Ltd vs.softobell Inc. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2018
1 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 204/2016 SHOPPERS STOP LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra, Advocate with Ms. Surabhi Iyer and Ms. Shubhie Wahi, Advocates. versus SOFTOBELL INC. & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Savni Dutt, Advocate with Ms. Gitanjali Mathew, Advocate for defendant No.3. Ms. Nupur Lamba and Ms. Surbhi Singh, Advocates for defendant No.4. Date of Decision:01. t November, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 14807/2018 Present application has been filed seeking impleadment of Aeora Solutions Pvt. Ltd. as defendant No.6. CS (COMM) 204/2016 Page 1 of 8 Since the party sought to be impleaded has been served and none appears for it, the present application is allowed. Plaintiff is permitted to re-file the amended memo of parties during the course of the day. CS(COMM) 204/2016 & I.As. 6941/2015, 17211/2015 AND11362016 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement ...
Amarendra Nath Misra & Ors vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2018
$~38 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + WP(C) 6098/2018 with CM APPL. 23614-23615/2018 & AMARENDRA NATH MISRA & ORS370572018 Date of decision : November 01, 2018 ..... Appellants Through Mr. Arunav Pathak and Mr. Shikhar Saha, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Ms.Gauraan and Mr. Shaswat Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.1.... Petitioners, who have been the Members of either Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) or Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), are aggrieved of the order dated 06.11.2017 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, whereby, the OA no.1586/2010 made by them seeking quashing of the memorandums dated 11.02.2009, 13/16.03.2009 and 18.11.2009 with directions for re-fixation of WP(C) 6098/2018 Page 1 of 11 their pension with consequential benefits w.e.f. 01.01.2006, ...
Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. Vs.sh. Shamim Ahmed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:01. 11.2018 Through: Mr. Anil Bhasin, Adv. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CRL.L.P. 723/2018 $~65 * % + BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. SH. SHAMIM AHMED CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. Through: versus The petition seeks leave to appeal against order dated 27.07.2018 which dismissed the petitioners complaint for prosecution of the respondent for theft of electricity under section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.2. It is the petitioners case that a raid was conducted at the premises of the respondent where he was running a Guest House and was stealing electricity from underground and overhead cables by tapping into them. The raid was conducted with the assistance of two policemen from the local police station i.e. Police Station Jama Masjid. The entire process of raid was videographed by M/s Arora Photographic Agency. A person called Jamil Ahmed (sic) who was representing the consumer Shamim Ahm...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›