Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Building Construction Company Limited vs.union of India & Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1144/2016 % Reserved on:27. h July, 2018 Date of Decision:16. h November, 2018 NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. J.K. Mittal and Mr. Rajeev Singh, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K. Radha Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Mr. Satish Agarwala & Mr. Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Advocates for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.National Building Construction Corporation Ltd., hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, is a Public Sector Undertaking under the Ministry of Urban Development of the Government of India.2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India primarily challenging the letter dated 3rd December, 2015 from the Director General of Central Excise Intelligence informing them about the permission a...
Anil Kumar Jain vs.prem Chand Dubey & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :13. h November, 2018 Date of decision :16. h November, 2018 RSA442018 ANIL KUMAR JAIN ..... Appellant Through Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. Versus PREM CHAND DUBEY & ORS. ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant vide the present Regular Second Appeal No.44/2018 assails the impugned judgment and decree dated 31.10.2017 of the First Appellate Court of the learned Additional District Judge-8 (Central), Tis Hazari, Delhi in RCA No.75/2017 which upheld the impugned judgment and decree dated 04.02.2017 of the Court of the learned Civil Judge-11 (Central), Tis Hazari Delhi in Suit No.998(Old No.766/14), vide which the suit filed by the appellant herein as the plaintiff thereof i.e. of Suit No.998(Old No.766/14) against the defendants No.1, 2 & 3 therein, arrayed as the respondents No.1, 2 & 3 to the present RSA442018, vide which the RSA442018 Page 1 of 9 plaintiff, arrayed as...
Jitender Sabharwal vs.smt. Rekha Sabharwal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
REKHA SABHARWAL & ANR versus JITENDER SABHARWAL + CRL.M.C. 5473/2014 JITENDER SABHARWAL versus *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :29. h August, 2018 Judgment delivered on:16. h November, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3646/2014 ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner SMT REKHA SABHARWAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr.Dinesh Malik with Mr.Puneet Jain, Advocates for the petitioners in CRL.M.C. 3646/2014 Mr.Rajiv Ghawana with Ms.Akshita Chatwal, Advocates for the... Petitioners in CRL.M.C. 5473/2014 For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr.Rajiv Ghawana with Ms.Akshita Chatwal, Advocates for the respondents in CRL.M.C. 3646/2014 Mr.Dinesh Malik with Mr.Puneet Jain, Advocates for the... RESPONDENTS in CRL.M.C. 5473/2014 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT CRL.M.C. 3646/2014 & CRL.M.C. 5473/2014 Page 1 of10 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. These cross petitions, one by the wife and the other by the husban...
Arvinder Singh Bhatia vs.ashok Kumar Khattar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
$~16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"16th November, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2574/2018 and Crl.M.A.9134-9135/2018 ARVINDER SINGH BHATIA ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Asutosh Lohia, Advocate with Mrs. Archana Saxena, Adv. Ms. Radhika Nair & Mr. Rohan Dewan, Advocates versus ASHOK KUMAR KHATTAR .... Respondent Through: Mr. Narender Mann, SPP with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The respondents had instituted a criminal complaint case (presently registered as CC No.536410/2016) in the year 2000 alleging offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 having been committed by the petitioner on the allegations that he had issued two cheques each of Rs.5 lacs drawn on Bank of India which, upon presentation, were returned unpaid and further that in spite of the notice of demand the petitioner had failed to make payment of the value of the said cheques.2. The pre-summoning inquiry into the said criminal c...
Anjani Kumar Rai vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
#3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 3135/2018 ANJANI KUMAR RAI Judgment delivered on:16. 11.2018 ........ Petitioner Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate along with... Petitioner in person : Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) and Inspector Parvinder and SI Sandeep, AHTU/SD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 instituted on behalf of the petitioner prays as follows:-"W.P.(CRL.) 3135/2018 Page 1 of 1 In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to:-"(a) To issue a writ in the nature of habeas corpus and/or directions/ orders to the police to find out...
Dr. Kanwaljeet Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA6712017 DR. KANWALJEET SINGH Reserved on:12. h November, 2018 Decided on:16. h November, 2018 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kunal Vinayak, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms Akansha Mishra, Advocates for R1, 2 and 4. Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for R3 and 5. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by Dr. Kanwaljeet Singh is directed against the judgment dated 8th August, 2017 dismissing his W.P.(C) No.7711/2016. In effect, the learned Single Judge negatived the plea of the Appellant that the appointment of the Respondent No.5 as Vice-Chancellor (VC) of the Laxmibai National Institute of Physical Education, Gwalior (LNIPE) by the order dated 23rd September 2015, pursuant to an approval order issued on the previous day i.e. 22nd September, 2015 by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC), was illegal. LPA6712017...
Gauri Bhalla vs.ashish Bhalla & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:15. h October, 2018 Judgment delivered on:16. h November, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3381/2018 GAURI BHALLA versus ASHISH BHALLA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner :... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Chandan Junto, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Narender Malawaliya, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 26.02.2018 whereby the application of the petitioner seeking residence in the matrimonial home/shared household has been rejected.2. The petitioner had claimed the right of residence in House No.51, Anand Lok, New Delhi on the ground that the petitioner had been granted rental for accommodation under Section 19(f) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, however, the respondent No.1 had not paid the same. It is contended that s...
Lokesh vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1765/2018 LOKESH THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Dudeja, Mr. Raj Kumar Tomar and Mr. Saurabh Jhamb, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Ved Prakash CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1611.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.192/2018 under Sections 3of the IPC registered at Police Station Kalyan Puri, New Delhi.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant along with his friend had gone to the locality of the accused to collect donations for holding a religious function. It is contended that accused confronted the complainant and his friend and thereafter an altercation took place wherein the complainant and his friend were assaulted. BAIL APPLN. 1765/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned c...
Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Company vs.seeta Badrinath
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.661/2006 + % MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS COMPANY16h November, 2018 SEETA BADRINATH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ankit Swarup, Advocate with Mr. Suraj R. Kesherwani, Advocate (M. No.7705870873). versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abinash Kumar Mishra, Advocate (M. No.9811235958). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 20.07.2006 by which the trial court has decreed the suit of the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.3,45,597/- alongwith interest at 9% per annum simple from 08.06.2001 till the date of payment. The suit amount is the RFA No.661/2006 Page 1 of 14 amount which are the electricity dues which were payable for the period for which the appellant/defendant was a tenant in the tenanted/sub...
Mata Gujri Public School vs.narinder Kaur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h November, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12234/2018 & CM APPL. 47395-47396/2018 MATA GUJRI PUBLIC SCHOOL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshbir Singh Kohli, Advocate along with Mr. Prakash Chandra Sen, Mr. Gurvinder of petitioner school. Singh, Representatives versus NARINDER KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate for R-2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 06.11.2017 passed by the Delhi School Tribunal whereby the learned tribunal while setting aside order dated 14.08.2018 directed the petitioner herein to reinstate the respondent No.1 within one month from passing of the order. It is further directed the respondent No.1 will be entitled for all consequential benefits and full wages from the date of impugned order. With respect to the back wages in Rule 125 of Delhi School Education Act and R...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »