Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Food Corporation of India, Ferozpur vs.ram Chand Sohan Lal and Partner ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h November, 2018 + O.M.P. 205/2014 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, FEROZPUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Advocate (M-9811537909). versus RAM CHAND SOHAN LAL AND PARTNERS & ORS Through: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri & Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges the award dated 23rd October, 2013 passed by the Learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The... Petitioner Food Corporation of India (hereinafter, FCI) and Ram Chand Sohan Lal and Partners (hereinafter miller) had entered into a milling agreement dated 10th February, 1995. Under the said contract, the miller was to mill the paddy and supply the rice to FCI. As per the contract, FCI had supplied 16528 bags (1068.30.000 quintals) of superfine variety paddy and 1120 ba...
M/S Ajnala Rice Mills vs.fci
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h November, 2018 + O.M.P. 812/2014 M/S AJNALA RICE MILLS ........ Petitioner FCI Through: None. versus Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Advocate ..... Respondent (M-9811537909). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Act has been filed challenging the award of Ld. Sole Arbitrator dated 13th June, 2013. None appears for the... Petitioner/miller (hereinafter, miller).2. The parties had entered into a milling contract dated 8th October, 1994 under which the Food Corporation of India (hereinafter, FCI) was to supply to the miller paddy, of different varieties, the miller was to store and mill the same, and supply the resultant rice back to FCI. This exercise had to be completed on or before 28th February, 1995. Pursuant to the said contract, FCI had supplied 6290 bags (4088-50-000 quintals) of superfine variety paddy, 7743 bags (5032-95-000 quintals) of fin...
Food Corporation of India, Ferozpur vs.shree Guru Nanak Rice Mills and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2018
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h November, 2018 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, FEROZPUR ........ Petitioner O.M.P. 202/2014 Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Advocate (M-9811537909). versus SHREE GURU NANAK RICE MILLS AND PARTNERS & ORS Through: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri & Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges the award dated 23rd October, 2013 passed by the Learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The... Petitioner Food Corporation of India (hereinafter, FCI) and Shree Guru Nanak Rice Mills and Partners (hereinafter miller) had entered into a milling agreement dated 16th February, 1995. Under the said contract, the miller was to mill the paddy and supply the rice to FCI. As per the contract, FCI had supplied 33561 bags (21788.60 quintals) of superfine variety padd...
Food Corporation of India,bhatinda vs.m/s Bharat Rice Mills(bhatinda)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h November, 2018 + O.M.P. 49/2014 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA,BHATINDA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Advocate (M-9811537909). versus M/S BHARAT RICE MILLS(BHATINDA) Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges the award dated 27th August, 2013 passed by the Learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The... Petitioner Food Corporation of India (hereinafter, FCI) and M/s Bharat Rice Mills (hereinafter miller) had entered into a milling agreement dated 17th October, 1994. Under the said contract, the miller was to mill the paddy and supply the rice to FCI. As per the contract, FCI had supplied 77730 bags (50524-50-000 quintals) of fine variety paddy to the miller for milling and to be delivered to FCI by 28th February, 1995. It is claimed by FCI that the miller had milled onl...
Fci, Bhatinda vs.m/s Hemkunt Rice Mills & Its Partner, Bhatinda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h November, 2018 + O.M.P. 395/2012 & I.A. 7850/2012 FCI, BHATINDA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Advocate (M-9811537909). versus M/S HEMKUNT RICE MILLS & ITS PARTNER, BHATINDA Through: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri & Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges the award dated 19th December, 2011 passed by the Learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The... Petitioner Food Corporation of India (hereinafter, FCI) and M/s Hemkunt Rice Mills (hereinafter miller) had entered into a milling agreement dated 25th October, 1994. Under the said contract, the miller was to mill the paddy and supply rice to FCI. As per the contract, FCI had supplied 58610 bags (38096-50-000 quintals) of fine variety paddy to the miller for milling and ...
Living Media India Limited & Anr vs.mandeep Kaur & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
$~A- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 11.2017 CS(COMM) 990/2016 LIVING MEDIA INDIA LIMITED & ANR ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Chander Lall, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sajad Sultan, Adv. versus MANDEEP KAUR & ANR. Through None. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) Arguments have been heard in the suit. Despite service none has 1. appeared on behalf of Defendants. Since, Defendants did not appear, they were proceeded ex parte vide order dated 17.09.2014.2. The present suit is filed by the Plaintiffs for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants from infringement and passing off trademark AAJ TAK or any other trademark deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs registered trademark AAJ TAK in relation to magazine, newspaper, journal etc.3. It is the contention of the Plaintiffs that Plaintiff no.1 is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 which is one of the major media CS (COMM) 990/2016 Page 1 of 7 corporations...
Praveen Verma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:24. h September, 2018 Judgment delivered on:16. h November, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1868/2011 PRAVEEN VERMA versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Rajesh Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Shashi Kumar Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Sudha Reddy and Ms. Katyayini, Advs. for R-3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.JUDGMENT1... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.578/2005 under section 498A/406/5Indian penal code, police station Shalimar Bagh and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.2. Contention of the petitioner is that petitioner is a citizen of United States of America and is a permanent resident there.... Petitioner married Respondent No.3 on 04.05.1992. By a decree of divorce dated 10.08.2007 marriage between the parties has been dissolved.3. It is contended that Respondent ...
Vinod vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16.11.2018 % + BAIL APPLN. 2684/2018 VINOD versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Gulati, Advocate. For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. ASI Ramdev, Narcotics Cell, Crime Branch. : JUDGMENT1611.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of four weeks in FIR No.106/2018 under Section 21 NDPS Act, Police Station Crime Branch on the ground that his brother-in-law (wifes brother) has expired on 04.11.2018 and the last rituals are to be performed on 17.11.2018 and thereafter within next 3-4 days Dharam Shant has to be performed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some rituals need to be performed in Kurukshetra also.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier also granted interim bail...
Rajeev Behl vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12294/2018 & CM Nos. 47688-90/2018 RAJEEV BEHL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Jayant Tripathi and Mr Sarfaraz alongwith Advocates Ahmed, petitioner in person. versus STATE & ORS Through: Ms Shefali Vohra, Advocate for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS and R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1611.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 17.102018 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Divisional Commissioner allowing respondent no.3s appeal preferred under Rule 22 (3) (4) of the Delhi Maintenance & Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009 (hereafter the said Rules).2. By the impugned order, the Divisional Commissioner has directed that the petitioner be evicted from the property bearing No.19, State Bank Colony, G.T. Karnal Road, Delhi -110009 (hereafter the property in question) within a period of 30 days from the date of the said order. The petitioner as...
Ghanshyam Kumar vs.punjab National Bank & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h November, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4674/2015 & CM APPL. 8469/2015 GHANSHYAM KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, Adv. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sangam Kumar, Mr. Vikas Verma and Mr. Shahid Akhtar, Advs. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the respondent no.1 to give the joining to the petitioner on the post of Probationary Officer / Management Trainee in Punjab National Bank, considering that the petitioners result was declared prior to 01.07.2013, and consequently to set aside the order dated 13.04.2015, which was received by the petitioner on 01.05.2015, through which the candidature of the petitioner for the said post was rejected by R-1, the Punjab National Bank.2. The case of the petitioner is that the provisional mark sheet was issued to the petition...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »