Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Icici Bank Ltd vs.sonu Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~3 * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h February, 2017 FAO812016 ICICI BANK LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Adv. versus SONU SINGH Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant is seeking ex parte appointment of receiver in respect of MARUTI ALTO/K10LXI Vehicle bearing Registration No.HR-26-CL-7870.2. The appellant instituted a suit for recovery of Rs.3,62,334.37 against the respondent on the ground that the appellant advanced a loan of Rs.3,43,200/- to the respondent for purchase of car make MARUTI ALTO K10/LXI. The loan was repayable in 60 monthly instalments of Rs.7,462/- each. The respondent executed credit facility application, deed of hypothecation and irrevocable power of attorney in favour of the appellant. The respondents committed default after payment of Rs.22,386/-. Vide notice dated 27th April, 2015, the appellant recalled the loan and called upon to the respondents ...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.ravish Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~10 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO2222016 ICICI BANK LTD Date of Decision:28. h February, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Adv. versus RAVISH KUMAR Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.18321/2016 The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. FAO2222016 & CM No.18319/2016 1. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks dispensation of the service of notice on the respondent on the ground that the impugned order was passed by the learned Trial Court before service of notice on the respondent. Considering that the impugned order was passed before service of notice on the respondent, the notice to the respondent in this appeal is dispensed with and the appeal is taken up for hearing.2. The appellant instituted a suit for recovery of Rs.6,46,337.56 against the respondent on the ground that the appellant advanced a loan of Rs.7,23,500/- to the respondent for purchase of car m...
M/S Allied Blenders & Distillers Pvt. Ltd vs.r.k. Distilleries Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:28. 02.2017 FAO (OS) No.251/2016 & CM Nos.30421/2016, 30422/2016 and 30423/2016 M/s ALLIED BLENDERS & DISTILLERS PVT. LTD ... Appellant versus ... Respondent R.K. DISTILLERIES PVT. LTD Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Sudhir Chandra Agarawal, Sr Advocate with Mr Pravin Anand, Mr Shrawan Chopra, Ms Abhilasha Nautiyal, Mr Kanak Bose and Mr Sanjay Chhabra and Ms Vijay Laxmi Mewara : Mr Vikramajit Banerjee, Mr Hemant Daswani, Sumit Kumar, Mr Harsh Vardhan and Mr Vaibha Chadha CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J JUDGMENT1 The appellant / plaintiff is aggrieved by the judgment dated 27.07.2016 delivered by a learned single Judge of this court in CS(OS) 2266/2013, whereby the learned single Judge, while considering an application (IA No.18636/2013), which had been filed by the appellant / plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 ...
Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs.great Eastern Shipping Company Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~ * 12. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 29/2015 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K.Ganguli, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shaiwal Srivastava and Mr. Arunabh Ganguli, Advocates. versus GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED... Respondent Through: Mr. Amitava Majumdar, Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Mr. Abhishek Goyal and Mr. Arjun Mittal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER2802.2017 % 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) by Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) is to an Award dated 30th June 2015 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between SAIL and the Respondent Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited (GE Shipping).2. This is actually the third round of litigation between the parties. Background facts 3. The background facts are that GE Shipping, which is in the business of operating vessels, which are let out for carriage of goods by sea, is the owner...
Manju Gupta vs.daya Ram & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:28. 02.2017 + C.R.P. 51/2017 & CM Nos.8123-124/2017 MANJU GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Amit Swami, Advocate versus DAYA RAM & ORS Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) By the present petition filed under Section 115 read with Section 151 1. CPC, the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 25.10.2016 by which his application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC was dismissed.2. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 for possession, recovery, damages and mesne profits. It is contended in the plaint that the property was purchased by Sh.Naresh Chand Gupta. The property was occupied by various tenants/trespassers. It is further stated that defendants/respondents No.2 to 5 are the trespassers in the property. Respondent No.1/plaintiff claims title through alleged Will and Power of Attorney which is said to have been executed by Sh.Naresh Chand Gupta mea...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.abhishek Bhadana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~18 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO202017 Date of Decision:28. h February, 2017 ICICI BANK LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Adv. versus Through: None. ABHISHEK BHADANA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ..... Respondent JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.1130/2017 The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. FAO202017& CM No.1128/2017 1. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks dispensation of the service of notice on the respondent on the ground that the impugned order was passed by the learned Trial Court before service of notice on the respondent. The Trial Court record has been perused. Considering that the impugned order was passed before service of notice on the respondent, the notice to the respondent in this appeal is dispensed with and the appeal is taken up for hearing.2. The appellant instituted a suit for recovery of Rs.7,17,821.41 against the respondent on the ground that the appellant advanced a loan of Rs.6,80,000/-...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.manish Mishra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h February, 2017 FAO2202016 ICICI BANK LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Adv. versus MANISH MISHRA Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.18270/2016 The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. FAO2202016 & CM No.18268/2016 1. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks dispensation of the service of notice on the respondent on the ground that the impugned order was passed by the learned Trial Court before service of notice on the respondent. Considering that the impugned order was passed before service of notice on the respondent, the notice to the respondent in this appeal is dispensed with and the appeal is taken up for hearing.2. The appellant instituted a suit for recovery of Rs.3,60,688.44 against the respondent on the ground that the appellant advanced a loan of Rs.3,74,181/- to the respondent for purchase of car m...
Sr. Cpt. (Ig) Bindu Sethi vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : January 17, 2017 Judgment pronounced on: February 28, 2017 Writ Petition (C) 7677/2016 Through : Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate ........ Petitioner SR. CPT. (IG) BINDU SETHI versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Sriram Krishna and Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Advocates A. K. CHAWLA, J.JUDGMENT1... Petitioner, who came to be promoted as Sr. Captain (IG) in BSF after a protracted litigation, by the writ petition now filed, seeks issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash a communication dated 3.5.2016 issued by the office of the respondent no.2 declining to entertain representations made by the petitioner and in the context whereof, the petitioner seeks directions by way of a writ of mandamus for being given the charge of Inspector General (Air) and Accountable Manager in place of the WP(C) - 767...
Rajinder Agarwal & Ors vs.jammu & Kashmir Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~18. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7904/2015 and CM APPL. 15983/2015, 28693/2015 RAJINDER AGARWAL & ORS Through: Mr. Aman Vachher, Advocate with Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK Through: Mr. V.K. Dhar, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2802.2017 1. Counsel for the petitioners states that he has obtained instructions from his clients to the effect that the respondent/Bank has sanctioned the One Time Settlement proposal made by the petitioners. He assures the Court that the petitioners shall abide by the terms and conditions of the One Time Settlement sanctioned by the respondent/Bank.2. In view of the submission made hereinabove, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition which is disposed of alongwith the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J FEBRUARY28 2017 rkb/ap...
Rajveer Sharma vs.national Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.6595/2016 and connected matters + W.P. (C) No.6595/2016 28th February, 2017 ........ Petitioner * + % RAJVEER SHARMA Through Mr. S Janani, Advocate. versus NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocate for Respondent no.1. Mr. Bharat Sangal, Advocate for Respondent no.2. + W.P. (C) No.10113/2016 RAMPAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. S Janani, Advocate. versus NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD. & ........ RESPONDENTS ORS. Through Ms. Meghna Katari, Advocate for Respondent no.1. Mr. I. S Alag, Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Ahmad Shahrooz, for Respondent no.2. Advocates Zoheb Hossain, Ms. Standing Respondent no.3. Counsel Sr. for W.P.(C) No.6595/2016 and connected matters 1 of 48 + W.P. (C) No.1093/2017 HARI DUTT SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. S Janani, Advocate. versus NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ashim Vachher, Advocat...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »