Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 23 2017

Geeta Malhotra vs.ravneet Kaur Chowdhary

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2017

$~A-38 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 51/2017 GEETA MALHOTRA Date of decision:23. 02.2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Siddharth Agarwal and Mr.Kalam Singh, Advocates versus RAVNEET KAUR CHOWDHARY ..... Respondent Through Mr.Jasmeet Singh, Mr.Saurabh Tiwari and Ms.Gayatri Aryan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CM No.4604/2017 &4605/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. RC.REV. 51/2017 & CM Nos.4603/2017 (stay) & 4606/2017 1. By the present petition the petitioner seeks to impugn the eviction order dated 20.08.2016 by which the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC) dismissed the application filed by the petitioner/tenant seeking leave to defend and passed an eviction order under section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) in favour of the respondent/landlord. RC REV.51/2017 Page 1 2. T...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2017

Vijay Kumar vs.new Delhi Municipal Council

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2017

$~32. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1709/2017 and CM APPL. 7638-39/2017 1. VIJAY KUMAR Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Through: Mr. Vivek B. Saharya, ASC with Mr. Mananjay K. Mishra, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER2302.2017 for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent/NDMC to transfer and renew the licence of Kiosk No.15 at Gandhi Sadan, Mandir Marg, New Delhi, in his favour in terms of the extant policy.2. Ms. Takiar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent/NDMC with the aforesaid request but has not heard from them till date. The last representation submitted by the petitioner in this regard was received by NDMC on 07.02.2017, but to no avail.3. Mr. Saharya, learned counsel for the respondent/NDMC,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2017

Kanarath Payattiyath Balraj vs.raja Arora

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2017

* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d February, 2017 CRL.M.C. 3303/2016 & Crl.M.As. 14050/2016, 18100/2016 KANARATH PAYATTIYATH BALRAJ ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aditya Bhatt, Mr. Atul N., Mr. A. Rao, Mr.Nitin Saluja, Advs. RAJA ARORA versus Represented by: Ms. Pearl Bindra, Adv. ..... Respondent CRL.M.C. 3310/2016 & Crl.M.As. 14069/2016, 18067/2016 KANARATH PAYATTIYATH BALARAJ ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aditya Bhatt, Mr. Atul N., Mr. A. Rao, Mr.Nitin Saluja, Advs. RAJA ARORA versus Represented by: Ms. Pearl Bindra, Adv. ..... Respondent CRL.M.C. 3311/2016 & Crl.M.A. 14071/2016 KANARATH PAYATTIYATH BALARAJ ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. ASHOK ARORA versus with Mr. Aditya Bhatt, Mr. Atul N., Mr. A. Rao, Mr.Nitin Saluja, Advs. ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Pearl Bindra, Adv. Crl.M.C. 3303/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 22 +...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2017

Bharadwaj Thiruvenkata Venkatravaraghavan vs.raja Arora

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2017

* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d February, 2017 CRL.M.C. 2760/2016 & & Crl.M.A. 11755/2016 BHARDWAJ THUIRUVENKATA VENKATAVRAGHAVAN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Adv. ASHOK ARORA versus with Ms. Parul Kumar, Mr. Shalin Arthwan, Mr. Nikhil Ahuja, Advs. ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Pearl Bindra, Adv. CRL.M.C. 4268/2016 & Crl.M.A. 17792/2016 BHARADWAJ THIRUVENKATA VENKATAVARAGHAVAN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Parul Kumar, Mr. Shalin Arthwan, Mr. Nikhil Ahuja, Advs. versus ASHOK ARORA ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Pearl Bindra, Adv. CRL.M.C. 4269/2016 & Crl.M.A. 17795/2016 BHARADWAJ THIRUVENKATA VENKATAVARAGHAVAN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Parul Kumar, Mr. Shalin Arthwan, Mr. Nikhil Ahuja, Advs. Crl.M.C. 2760/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 22 + + + versus ASHOK ARORA ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Pearl Bindra, A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2017

A Krishna Reddy vs.cbi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :9. h NOVEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :23. d FEBRUARY, 2017 CRL.M.C. 4149/2011 A KRISHNA REDDY CBI ........ Petitioner Ms.Radha, Advocate. Through : Mr.Rajesh Anand, Advocate with versus Through : Ms.Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel ..... Respondent + with Mr.Sushil Kumar Dubey & Mr.Abhishek Chauhan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present petition is dismissed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.M.C. 4031/2011 titled A Krishna Reddy vs. CBI Thr. Director. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE FEBRUARY23 2017 / tr...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2017

Kanarath Payattiyath Balaraj vs.ashok Arora

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2017

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2017

Bharadwaj Thiruvenkata Venkataravaraghavan vs.raja Arora

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2017

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2017

A Krishna Reddy vs.cbi Thr. Director

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :9. h NOVEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :23. d FEBRUARY, 2017 CRL.M.C. 4031/2011 A KRISHNA REDDY CBI THR. DIRECTOR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Rajesh Anand, Advocate with versus Ms.Radha, Advocate. ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel with Mr.Sushil Kumar Dubey & Mr.Abhishek Chauhan, Advocates. ........ Petitioner Ms.Radha, Advocate. Through : Mr.Rajesh Anand, Advocate with versus Through : Ms.Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel ..... Respondent CRL.M.C. 4149/2011 A KRISHNA REDDY CBI with Mr.Sushil Kumar Dubey & Mr.Abhishek Chauhan, Advocates. ........ Petitioner Ms.Radha, Advocate. Through : Mr.Rajesh Anand, Advocate with versus Through : Ms.Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 180/2012 A KRISHNA REDDY CBI with Mr.Sushil Kumar Dubey & Mr.Abhishek Chauhan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + + AND + CRL.M.C. 4031/2011 & connected matters. Page 1 of 14 S.P.GARG, J.1. In Crl.M.C. 4031...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2017