Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Nsic Ltd vs.punjab National Bank and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
$~R-4. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) 8799/2011 Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arvind Sah, Advocate ........ Petitioner NSIC LTD versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anupama and Mr. Shah Usman, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2702.2017 1. Mr. Sanat Kumar, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner states, on instructions, that in view of the recent judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Northern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. reported as (2016) 8 SCC685 the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, while reserving its right to seek its remedies of adjudication of the dispute with the respondents, as may be available to it in law.2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. HIMA KOHLI, J FEBRUARY27 2017 sk/ap...
Amitabh Hoskote vs.rohit Bhatia & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 27, 2017 MAC.APP. 24/2009 AMITABH HOSKOTE ..... Appellant Through Mr. Manu Shahalia, Advocate % (i) + (ii) + Versus ROHIT BHATIA & ORS. Through Mr. P. Achayra, Advocate .....Respondents MAC.APP. 756/2014 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD Through Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus MAJOR AMITABH HOSKOTE Through Mr. Manu Shahalia, Advocate .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR (ORAL) JUDGMENT Above captioned two appeals are directed against impugned Award of 27th September, 2008 which grants compensation of `15,42,000/- with interest @7.5% per annum to Claimant, who was injured in a road accident on 25th August, 2003. Above captioned first appeal is by Claimant, who is an Army Officer, a bachelor aged 33 years, to seek Mac.App.24/2009 Mac.App.756/2014 Page 1 of 8 enhancement of compensation. Additional evidence has been led by Claimant-Injured in this appeal to seek compensation of `24 lacs towa...
Shri Sita Ram Kinra & Ors vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + TEST.CAS. 82/2012 Judgment delivered on:27. 02.2017 SHRI SITA RAM KINRA & ORS. ........ Petitioners STATE ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : Mr Arun Oberoi and Mr Hem Kumar : None. JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereafter the Act) for grant of probate of the Will dated 01/10/2010 (hereafter the Will) of Ms Neelam Gupta (hereafter referred to as the Testator) who expired on 30/11/2010. It is stated that the Will is the last Will and Testament of deceased, Ms Neelam Gupta. Notice in the present petition was issued to the respondent on 05.11.2012 and citation was also ordered to be published in the newspaper The Times of India, Delhi Edition.2. Although all the petitioners have filed their respective affidavits affirming the averments made in th...
M/S Katyaini Images (India) Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.m/s Kelson Steel Products ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
$~20. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA6922016 M/S KATYAINI IMAGES (INDIA) PVT LTD & ANR.... Appellants Through: Mr. Desh Raj and Mr. D.K. Kaushik, Advocates versus M/S KELSON STEEL PRODUCTS PVT LTD Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Counsels for the parties jointly state that pursuant to the parties being ORDER2702.2017 referred to mediation, they have been able to arrive at a settlement as recorded in the Settlement Agreement dated 10.02.2017 forwarded by the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. They state that the terms and conditions of the settlement have been set out in para 6 of the Settlement Agreement, whereunder the appellant/defendant has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.5 lacs to the respondent/plaintiff in full and final settlement of all the claims, subject matter of the present appeal.2. It is stated that out of the aforesaid agreed amount, a sum of Rs.2,75,000/- was already deposited by the...
Braham Kumari Ishwariya Vishva Vidyalaya & Ors vs.suman Lata & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
$~A-69 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 02.2017 CM(M) 234/2017 BRAHAM KUMARI ISHWARIYA VISHVA VIDYALAYA & ORS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ravinder Kumar Arora, Ms. Samia Malik and Ms.Manisha Mehta, Advocates SUMAN LATA & ORS versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Amit Bhatia, Advocate for R-1 and R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH * % + JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CM No.7714/2017 (exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM(M)234/2017 & CM No.7713/2017(stay) 1. By the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 15.11.2016 by which application filed by the petitioner/defendant under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to amend the written statement was dismissed.2. The plaintiff/respondent has filed the present suit for possession, damages and permanent injunction for the suit property situated at Gali No.7, Shahi Mohalla, West Rohtash Nagar,Shahdara, Delhi-32. It i...
Kanoria Industries Limited & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h February, 2017 W.P.(C) 494/1991 KANORIA INDUSTRIES LIMTIED & ORS ....... Petitioners Through: Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anuj Sharma, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.Review Petition No.335/2013 1. This order disposes of the preliminary objection to the very maintainability of the review petition, on the ground that the Special Leave Petition (SLP) preferred against the order of which review is sought having been dismissed, this Court cannot review its judgment.2. Review is sought of the judgment dated 13th July, 2012 of dismissal of the writ petition. The petitioners preferred SLP(C) No.31982/2012 against the said judgment and which came up before the Supreme Court on 7th December, 2012, when the following order was passed: R.P. No.335/2013 in W....
Virendra Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1701/2017 $~34. * + VIRENDRA KUMAR UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Through Nemo. versus Date of decision:27. h February, 2017 Through Mr. Ranvir Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The petitioners herein are pensioners, who had retired on or before 30th June, 2005.2. At the time of retirement, the petitioners were officers in the Department of Telecommunication, Government of India. However, pursuant to option exercised by them, they were treated as deemed absorbees in the Bhart Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL). There being difference between Central Dearness Allowance (CDA) pay scales and Industrial Dearness Allowance (IDA) pay scales applicable to the BSNL employees, on the basis of the recommendation of the Inter Ministerial Group approved W.P. (C) No.1701/2017 Page 1 of 5 by the Cabinet, the petitioners, who were in the pay-scal...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.gurbax Rai & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 27, 2017 + MAC.APP. 268/2008 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. versus Through Mr. J P N Shahi, Advocate ..... Appellant GURBAX RAI & ORS ....Respondents Through Mr. Survesh Bisaria, Advocate & Sharma, Mr.Prakash Chandra Advocate for Respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % (ORAL) Impugned Award of 1st February, 2008 grants compensation of `2 lacs with interest @7% per annum to respondent No.1-Claimant on account of injuries sustained in road accident on 21st August, 2003.... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 are owner and driver of vehicle in question. Appellant is Insurer of said vehicle. Facts already noted in impugned Award needs no reproduction for the reason that recovery rights are sought in this appeal by appellant-Insurer on the ground that driver of vehicle in question was driving said vehicle without any driving license. At hearing, learned counsel for appellant-Insurer has drawn attention of this C...
Deep Singh vs.the Institute of Cost Accountants of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: February 16, 2017 Judgment delivered on: February 27, 2017 + W.P.(C) 6772/2014 DEEP SINGH ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Singh Bindra & Ms. Sonal Alagh, Versus Advs. THE INSTITUTE OF COST ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.S. Chaturvedi & Mr. R. Madhav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"Therefore, in the facts and circumstances, it is humbly prayed before this Honble Court that this Honble Court may graciously be pleased to: a) Pass a writ of mandamus, or a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the petitioner entitled for exemption from appearance in the business valuation paper for final CMA exam conducted in June, 2014 by the Respondent (the institute); b) Pass a writ of mandamus, or a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the R...
Abb India Ltd. Vs.the Commissioner Trade & Taxes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
$~112, 113, 115 to 154 & 157 - 160 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. h February, 2017 W.P.(C) Nos. 1757/2017, 1758/2017, 1803/2017, 1804/2017, 1805/2017, 1806/2017, 1807/2017, 1808/2017, 1809/2017, 1810/2017, 1811/2017, 1812/2017, 1813/2017, 1814/2017, 1815/2017, 1816/2017, 1817/2017, 1818/2017, 1819/2017, 1820/2017, 1821/2017, 1822/2017, 1823/2017, 1824/2017, 1825/2017, 1826/2017, 1827/2017, 1828/2017, 1829/2017, 1830/2017, 1831/2017, 1832/2017, 1833/2017, 1834/2017, 1835/2017, 1836/2017, 1837/2017, 1838/2017, 1839/2017, 1840/2017, 1841/2017, 1842/2017, 1843/2017, 1844/2017, 1845/2017 & 1846/2017 ABB INDIA LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R. Jawaharlal, Mr. Siddharth Bawa, Mr. A. K. Bhardwaj, Mr. Manish Hirani and Mr. Shyamal Anand, Advocates. Versus THE COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shadan Farasat and Mr. Ahmed Said, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI S. RAVINDRA ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »