Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Sundoo Mal Ram Swarup vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2017
$~44 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 6441/2016 & CM No.26397/2016 Judgment delivered on:22. 02.2017 M/S SUNDOO MAL RAM SWARUP UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Arvind : Mr. Vishal Saxena, Adv. Chamoli, AC/GD/ITBP CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The petitioner impugns the order dated 18.05.2016 whereby the petitioner firm has been debarred from participating in all kinds of business/tenders in Indo Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) for a period of two years with effect from the date of the order.2. It is contended that the petitioner had participated in a tender invited by the respondent vide letter dated 01.12.2015. The petitioner was successful and awarded the contract.3. In terms of para-8(c) of Annexure-A to the tender documents, W.P.(C) 6441/2016 Page 1 of 8 t...
Raj Kumar Kaushik vs.the Bharat Scouts and Guides & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1647/2017 & CM Nos. 7414-7417/2017 + % RAJ KUMAR KAUSHIK Through: versus 22nd February, 2017 ........ Petitioner Mr. Santosh Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocates. THE BHARAT SCOUTS AND GUIDES & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Krishnan and Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Disposal of the writ petition is on a demurer of the respondent no.1 that Bharat Scouts and Guides is State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India and that this aspect is not being decided in this writ petition.2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of quashing of the office order dated 30.1.2017, and by which order the petitioner, who was on probation at the post of Deputy Director, has been reverted to the post of Assistant Director. By the self-same office order the p...
Abdul Sattar vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2017
$~7 * + W.P.(C) 771/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d February, 2017 ........ Petitioner ABDUL SATTAR GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC with Mr. Rizwan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Constable Abdul Sattar, in this writ petition, impugns two orders dated 14.1.2013 and 20.5.2013 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal for short) dismissing OA No.3/2011 and RA No.94/2013, respectively.2. In OA No.3/2011 the petitioner had challenged penalty of forfeiture of two years approved service permanently, (which had the effect of entailing a proportionate reduction in pay from Rs.11,400/- to Rs.10,730/-) imposed vide order dated 18.12.2009 passed by the Disciplinary Authority. The punishment order had further directed that the suspension period fr...
Kashi Nath Sah & Anr vs.shri Nath
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: February 09, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: February 22, 2017 RSA3992015 KASHI NATH SAH & ANR Through: Mr.Mahmood Hasan, Advocate ..... Appellants * % + versus SHRI NATH ..... Respondent Through: Mr.A.K.Sharma & Mr.C.M.Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT RSA3992015 1. This RSA under Section 100 CPC, has been filed by the appellants/defendants impugning the judgment of the First Appellate Court dated 12th October, 2015 by which the judgment of the Trial Court has been reversed.2. The learned Trial Court vide judgment dated 3rd July, 2015 has dismissed the suit for possession of the premises under the occupation and possession of the appellants/defendants in respect property bearing No.D- 3/213, Morya Gali, Gali No.20, D-Block, IIIrd Pusta, Sonia Vihar, Delhi- 110094, measuring 25 sq. yds.3. As a result of the impugned judgment of the learned First Appellate Court, the suit of the respondent/plain...
Behari Lal Lal Chand vs.deepak Raj Narula
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2017
$~A-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:22. 02.2017 + CM(M) 566/2016 and CM No.21374/2016 BEHARI LAL LAL CHAND ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Sonali Malhotra, Mr.Amit Sanduja and Mr. Anshul Mehta, Advocates. versus DEEPAK RAJ NARULA ..... Respondent Through Mr.Hameed S. Shaikh and Mr.Amar Pal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 15.02.2016 passed by the Rent Control Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the RCT) quashing the order of the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC) dated 09.07.2015 and remanding the matter back for fresh consideration after affording reasonable opportunity to the parties to lead evidence by summoning handwriting expert to prove as to whether the signatures appearing on the notice/summons sent through process server and those appearing on the AD C...
Data Deen vs.directorate of Education & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % DATA DEEN W.P.(C) No.7732/2010 22nd February, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate with Ms. Shifa Nagar, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, Additional Standing Counsel. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.6498/2012 (under Section 151 CPC by petitioner) 1. The relief which is claimed in this application is totally beyond the scope of the present writ petition. By this interim application, petitioner sought correction of lower scale of pay granted to the petitioner on account of recalculation order of the respondent no.3/employer. An interim application cannot be beyond the scope of the main writ petition. If there is a fresh cause of action which is not included in the scope of the cause of action of the main writ petition, petitioner necessarily has to file appropriate independent p...
Sudhir Chandra vs.col Dinesh Chandra (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2017
$~A-43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:22. 02.2017 + CM(M) 1265/2016 SUDHIR CHANDRA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Neeraj Malhotra, Mr.Om Prakash, Ms.Arzoo Ray and Mr.Rupal Luthra, Advocates versus COL DINESH CHANDRA (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS & ORS Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CM No.45528/2016(exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 1265/2016 & CM Nos.45527 & 45527/2016 1. By the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 23.11.2016 and the order dated 14.9.2016 by which fresh summons have been issued on LRs of deceased respondent No.1.2. The petitioner has filed a suit for declaration, cancellation of documents, damages, possession and injunction with regard to the property bearing No.F-75, Preet Vihar, New Delhi-110092. It is the contention of the petitioner in the suit that he is the owner of the suit property a...
Himanshi Anand vs.university of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.4060/2014 22nd February, 2017 HIMANSHI ANAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Advocate with Mr. S.S.Rai, Advocate. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, though the petitioner had sought two reliefs, today counsel for the petitioner confines the relief prayed only to prayer (b) of the writ petition and which is for direction to the respondent/University of Delhi to reserve posts for Persons with Disabilities (PWD) for recruitment for the posts of Junior Assistants to be done in terms of advertisement dated 6.11.2013.... Petitioner is an Orthopedically Handicapped (OH) person and he pleads that since recruitment did not W.P.(C) No.4060/2014 Page 1 of 10 take place...
Mrs. J K vs.mr. N S
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2017
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 70/2017 MRS. J K ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Jayant Bhatt, Mr. Prateek Yadav and Ms. Jyoti, Advocates. ..... Defendant versus Through: None. MR. N S CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % I.A. 2069/2017 (exemption) Allowed subject to just exception. ORDER2202.2017 CS(OS) 70/2017 & I.A. 2068/2017 ( O39R1&2) On furnishing process fee within a week, issue summons in the suit and notice of the application to the defendants by all modes, including registered post and approved courier, returnable 29.03.2017 before Joint Registrar where the matter be listed for completion of service, pleadings and admission/denial. The process be also served through e-mail as per High Court rules for the date fixed. Written statement/Reply by defendants be filed within 30 days from the date of service. Replication/Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within four week thereafter. Learned counsel for the plainti...
Vijay Pal Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :16. h January, 2017 Date of decision :22. d February, 2017 CRL.A. 734/2000 VIJAY PAL SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.Shamikh, Adv. STATE versus Through: CRL.A. 735/2000 VIJAY PAL SINGH STATE versus Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Addl.PP for State. Through: Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.Shamikh, Adv. ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Addl. PP for State. + + CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of Criminal Appeal No.735/2000 filed JUDGMENT by the appellant Vijay Pal Singh S/o Sodan Singh whereby he has assailed the impugned judgment dated 15.11.2000 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Karkardooma in Sessions Case No.1in relation to FIR Crl.A.Nos.734-735/2000 Page 1 of 65 No.564/89, PS Trilok Puri and the impugned order on sentence dated 17.11.2000 in the said case, whe...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »