Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Icici Bank Ltd vs.sandeep Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~12 * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO5292016 ICICI BANK LTD Date of Decision:28. h February, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Adv. versus SANDEEP KUMAR Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant seeks dispensation of the service of notice on the respondent on the ground that the impugned order was passed by the learned Trial Court before service of notice on the respondent. The Trial Court record has been perused. Considering that the impugned order was passed before service of notice on the respondent, the notice to the respondent in this appeal is dispensed with and the appeal is taken up for hearing.2. The appellant instituted a suit for recovery of Rs.3,34,971.03 against the respondent on the ground that the appellant advanced a loan of Rs.5,30,000/- to the respondent for purchase of car make I- 20/MAGNA14 DSL. The loan was repayable in 60 monthly instalments of Rs.11,...
Devas Multimedia Private Limited vs.antrix Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) 558/2015 Reserved on:14. h December 2016 Date of Decision:28. h February 2017 DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Omar Ahmad, Advocate. versus ANTRIX CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gourab Banerjee, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saket Sikri and Mr. Arjun Krishnan, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT2802.2017 Introduction 1. Devas Multimedia Private Limited (Devas) has filed this petition against Antrix Corporation Ltd. (Antrix) under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) for directions to Antrix to secure the amount awarded in favour of Devas by an Award of the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) dated 14th September, 2015 together with interest @ 18% per annum from the date of the Award till the date of full payment, by furnishing a Bank Guarantee (BG), or attaching the bank accounts, receivables, other movable or immovable as...
Ramesh Chand vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~ * + W.P.(C) 9221/2014 RAMESH CHAND versus Through ........ Petitioner Ramesh Pathak, Advocate IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI #12 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. % Date of Decision:28. h February,2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking allotment of an LIG Flat bearing No.52, Pappan Kalan, Sector 6, Delhi.2. The admitted facts of the present case are that on 17th September, 1979, the petitioner made an application for allotment of LIG flat under New Pattern Registration Scheme-1979 (for short NPRS-1979). In the year 1985, respondent-DDA gave an option to the registrants of NPRS-1979 to either become members of co-operative group housing society or to register themselves under Self Financing Scheme (for short SFS). W.P.(C) 9221/2014 Page 1 of 5 3. On 14th August, 1985, the petitioner opted for SFS and paid t...
sh.pappi vs.sh.ramesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: February 21, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: February 28, 2017 RSA1992014 SH.PAPPI ..... Appellant Through: Dr.L.S.Chaudhary, Mr.Ajay Choudhary, Ms.Reema Bhola & Mr.Viresh Chaudhary, Advocates. versus SH.RAMESH KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.H.Ansari & Mr.Anshu Shukla, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT1 This RSA under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the appellant (defendant in Civil Suit No.411/06/02) impugning the judgment of the First Appellate Court dated 26th May, 2014 vide which the judgment passed by learned Trial Court has been reversed.2. The learned Trial Court, vide common judgment dated 23rd March, 2011, disposed of two civil suits i.e. Civil Suit No.410/filed by Sh.Pappi (appellant herein) and Civil Suit no.411/filed by Sh.Ramesh Kumar (respondent herein) and both the suit were dismissed.3. Feeling aggrieved, RCA No.7/2014 was preferred only by Sh.Ra...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.mehtab Alam & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~17 * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h February, 2017 FAO182017 & C.M. 1107/2017 ICICI BANK LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Adv. versus MEHTAB ALAM & OTHERS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant seeks dispensation of the service of notice on the respondent on the ground that the impugned order was passed by the learned Trial Court before service of notice on the respondent. The Trial Court record has been perused. Considering that the impugned order was passed before service of notice on the respondent, the notice to the respondent in this appeal is dispensed with and the appeal is taken up for hearing.2. The appellant instituted a suit for recovery of Rs.4,77,347.15 against the respondent on the ground that the appellant advanced a loan of Rs.5,11,060/- to the respondent for purchase of car make AL DOST LS. The loan was repayable in 46 monthly i...
Deepak Khosla vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON :28. h FEBRUARY, 2017 CRL.M.C. 663/2017 DEEPAK KHOSLA ........ Petitioner Through :... Petitioner in person. VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 439(2) read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., read with Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 01.02.2017 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge by which order dated 03.01.2017 of learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi in C.C. No.463927/2016 granting bail to the respondents No.2 to 4 (hereinafter referred as respondents) was upheld.2. 3. I have heard the petitioner and have examined the file. The petitioner urged to declare the impugned order dated 03.01.2017 whereby bail was granted to respondents without moving any written application by ...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.virender Kumar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h February, 2017 FAO2192016 ICICI BANK LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Adv. versus VIRENDER KUMAR SINGH Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL)\ CM No.18262/2016 The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. FAO2192016 & CM No.18260/2016 1. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks dispensation of the service of notice on the respondent on the ground that the impugned order was passed by the learned Trial Court before service of notice on the respondent. Considering that the impugned order was passed before service of notice on the respondent, the notice to the respondent in this appeal is dispensed with and the appeal is taken up for hearing.2. The appellant instituted a suit for recovery of Rs.7,49,005.66 against the respondent on the ground that the appellant advanced a loan of Rs.9,51,770/- to the respondent for purchase ...
St. Anthony’s Girl’s Sr. Sec. School Through Its Manager and Anr. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.14149/2009 + % ST. ANTHONYS GIRLS SR. SEC. SCHOOL THROUGH ITS MANAGER AND ANR. 28th February, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through Dr. M P Raju, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner no.1/school seeks the relief of quashing of the impugned order dated 17.08.2009 of the respondent no.2/Director of Education declining age relaxation for appointment of one Ms. Alamma AJ as the Principal of petitioner no.1/school. The impugned order dated 17.08.2009 reads as under:-"GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, OLD SECTT.,DELHI No.F.DE.15/ACT/2009/9897-98 Dated...
Anil Pandhoh vs.kamlesh Nagpal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~A-33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h February, 2017 + RC.REV. 231/2016 & CM Nos.41461-462/2016 ANIL PANDHOH ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Anisha Jain & Mr.Nitin Jain, versus Advocates KAMLESH NAGPAL AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.P.K.Rawal & Mr.Tarun Agarwal, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Advocates JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petition is filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order of eviction dated 12.02.2016 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC) under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act.2. The respondents/landlords have filed the present petition for eviction of the petitioner regarding shop No.9, Nala Market, Patel Nagar, New Delhi. The shop was initially allotted to Late Sh.Amar Nath Nagpal. After the death of Sh.Amar Nath Nagpal, the property devolved upon his legal heirs. A family settl...
Rakesh Raj and Associates vs.commissioner of Income Tax, Central-Ii & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
$~17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:28. h February, 2017 W.P.(C) No.12305/2015 RAKESH RAJ AND ASSOCIATES ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr. Somit Agarwal and Ms. Monika Ghai, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-II, & ANR. Through: Mr.Ashok K. Manchanda and Mr. Raghvendra K. Singh, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral):-"1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks quashing/modification of an order dated 07.11.2014 passed by the respondent No.1/Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II under Section 142(2D) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act) read with Rule 14B of the eponymous Rules of 1962.2. The petitioner was engaged by the respondents to conduct a special audit for seven years i.e. Assessment Years (AY) 2005-06 to 2011-12 of the auditee company/ M/s Micromax Informa...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »