Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 46 of about 590 results (0.019 seconds)Bhupinder Jit Singh vs.sonu Kumar
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h October, 2017. C.R.P. 176/2017 BHUPINDER JIT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Mr. Yogesh Mittal and Mr. Hasib-ur-Rehman, Advs. Versus Through: Mr. Paramjeet Singh, Adv. SONU KUMAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil ..... Respondent Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order [dated 1st April, 2017 in Civil Suit No.7970/2016 of the Court of Senior Civil Judge/Rent Controller, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC for a decree for possession forthwith.2. The petition was entertained for the detailed reasons given in order dated 9th August, 2017, vide which notice thereof was ordered to be issued to the respondent/defendant.3. 4. The counsels have been heard. The petitioner/plaintiff instituted the suit from which this petition ari...
Tag this Judgment!Aishwarya Adhikari vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7911/2016, CM No.32744/2016 AISHWARYA ADHIKARI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Mr.Vaibhav Vats and Ms.Soumya Maheshwari, Advs. Versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In view of the facts & circumstances stated above, it is prayed that this Honble Court in public interest may be pleased to:1. issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction thereby quashing and setting aside the report of W.P.(C) No.7911/2016 Page 1 of 39 the High Level Enquiry Committee set up by the respondent vide Office Order No.207/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 of the Vice Chancellor punishing the petitioner, and all other proceedings consequential to and arising out of the report of the High L...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Another vs.m/s Bwl Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) No.236/2016 & CM.28634/2016 Reserved on:1. t September, 2017 Date of Decision:12. h October, 2017 M/S BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Through Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. L.B. Rai & Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advocates. Versus M/S BWL LIMITED ..Respondent Through Ms. Tanya Khan, Advocate. FAO(OS) No.237/2016 & CM.28641/2016 M/S BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Through Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. L.B. Rai & Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advocates. Versus M/S BWL LIMITED ..Respondent Through Ms. Tanya Khan, Advocate. FAO(OS) No.238/2016 & CM.28643/2016 M/S BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Through Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. L.B. Rai & Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advocates. Versus M/S BWL LIMITED ..Respondent Through Ms. Tanya Khan, Advocate. FAO (OS) No.236/2016+connected appeals Page 1 of 22 + % FAO(OS) No.241/2016 & CM.28751/2016 M/S BHARAT...
Tag this Judgment!Anant Prakash Narayan vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P. (C) 7934/2016, CM No.32953/2016 ANANT PRAKASH NARAYAN ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Suroor Mander, Adv. Versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Routray, Ms. Anushka Ashok and Ms. Bhavna Pal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"Petitioner respectfully prays that this Honble Court may be pleased to:-"(i) issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order vide Office Order No.211/CP/2016 dated 22 August 2016 by the Chief Proctor of the University imposing punishment on... Petitioner No.1 of a fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) and the W.P.(C) No.7934/2016 Page 1 of 41 requirement of furnishing an undertaking; and ii). Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Order No.159/CP/2016 dated 25 April 2016 by the Chief Proctor ...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.lrs of Shankar Mittal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~9 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.1043/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. versus SONIA MITTAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv. for R1 to 3. Mr. Pramod Pandey, Adv. for R-4 & 5. + MAC APPEAL No.1044/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. versus LRS OF SHANKAR MITTAL & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv. for R1 to 3. Mr. Pramod Pandey, Adv. for R-4 & 5. + MAC APPEAL No.1048/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. versus AMOGH MITTAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv. for R1 to 3. MAC Appeal No.1043/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 8 Mr. Pramod Pandey, Adv. for R-4 & 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 17.02.2012, Shankar Mittal with his wife Sonia Mittal and minor son Amogh Mittal were going in a car bearin...
Tag this Judgment!Vipin vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~14 -15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on :13. h September, 2017 Judgement pronounced on :12. h October, 2017 + BAIL APPLN. 806/2017 VIPIN ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr.Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta and Ms. Tamanna, Advocates. Versus STATE ..Respondent Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State with SI Arvind Kumar, Police Station Sabzi Mandi, Delhi. BAIL APPLN.1459/2017 + MANOJ @ TINKY ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar with Mr. Surender Gupta, Advoctae. Versus STATE ..Respondent Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State with SI Arvind Kumar, P.S. Sabzi Mandi, Delhi CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 By this common order, I shall dispose of the petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.'), whereby the petitioners seek grant of Regular Bail in FIR No.167/2015 under Section 376D of the Bail Appln. 806/2017 and 1459/2017 Page 1 of 7 ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Kamala Dey & Ors. Vs.smt. Deboshree Biswas & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 CS(OS) 77/2016 SMT. KAMALA DEY & ORS. Represented by: Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus SMT. DEBOSHREE BISWAS & ANR. Represented by: Mr. Adeel Ahmed, Adv. for ..... Defendant D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present suit, the plaintiffs inter alia pray for a decree of permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendant No.2 restraining him, his agents, legal heirs, associates etc. from entering or remaining in or upon any portion of suit property being Ground Floor, B- 127, Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi 110019 and from committing any trespass thereupon and/or from in any manner damaging the suit premises and/or from creating any sort of third party charge, interest or lien over the same in any manner.2. It is the case of the plaintiffs that plaintiff No.1 is the sole owner of the suit property being B-127, Chittaranjan Park, New De...
Tag this Judgment!Kailash Yadav vs.ram Charan Yadav & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-322 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.344/2011 KAILASH YADAV ..... Appellant Through: None. versus RAM CHARAN YADAV & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was claimant before the motor accident claims tribunal in suit No.166/2010 instituted on 21.04.2010 whereby he sought compensation under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 07.01.2010 due to negligent driving of truck bearing registration No.DL1 2616, which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer) for the period in question. The tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 23.11.2010, awarded compensation in the sum of Rs. 13,91,620/-, directing the insurer to pay the same with interest. It is noted that the tribunal has awarded compensation under variou...
Tag this Judgment!Pramod Jain vs.krishan Chandra Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.971/2014 & CM No.17726/2014 PRAMOD JAIN Through: Mr. Randhir Jain, Mr. ..... Appellant Dhananjai Jain & Mr. Bhoop Singh, Advs. versus KRISHAN CHANDRA KUMAR & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhay Singh, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant herein was impleaded as second respondent in accident claim case (MACP No.54/2011) instituted by the first respondent (the claimant) on 23.03.2010 seeking compensation under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 27.02.2010 statedly involving negligent driving of Maruti car bearing registration No.DL6B4446 The second respondent herein was impleaded as first respondent in the claim proceedings before the tribunal he having been described as the driver of the said maruti car at the time of the accident. Both the appellant and the said seco...
Tag this Judgment!Fdc Limited vs.superstar Nutrition Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 10.2017 CS(COMM) 1270/2016 & I.A. 10109/2017 FDC LIMITED ..... Plaintiff versus SUPERSTAR NUTRITION LIMITED & ANR ..... Defendants : Mr. Utkarsh Joshi, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Ms. Sania Husaini and Mr. Rahat Bansal, Advs. JUDGMENT1110.2017 1. The plaintiff had filed this suit, inter-alia, seeking permanent injunction thereby restraining the defendants from infringing the registered Trademark ELECTRAL of the plaintiff.2. 3. By order dated 31.08.2017, the parties were referred to mediation. The parties have arrived at a settlement through the process of mediation and the settlement agreement dated 10.10.2017 has been executed.4. The original settlement agreement has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The same is taken on CS(COMM) 1270/2016 Page 1 of 2 record.5. The agree...
Tag this Judgment!