Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 49 of about 590 results (0.017 seconds)Dr. Nihal Singh vs.dr. (Mrs.) Priyanka Singh Badalia & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:11. h October, 2017 + CRL.REV.P. 117/2015 & CRL.M.A. 2941/2015, 19194/2016 1. DR. NIHAL SINGH ..... Revisionist 1.2. Through Mr. Vinay Sharma with Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocates versus DR. (MRS.) PRIYANKA SINGH BADALIA BABY HARSHA ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State Mr. K. G. Sharma, Advocate with Mr.K.S. Badatia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The instant revision petition filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred by the revisionist, i.e. Dr. Nihal Singh, for quashing/setting aside of the impugned order dated 21.11.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-3, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, in Criminal Appeal No.42/2014. Crl.Rev.P. 117/2015 Page 1 of 9 2. The brief facts stated are that, the revisionist was married to the respondent No.1, i.e. Dr. Priyanka Singh Badalia, on 22.11.2009 as p...
Tag this Judgment!M/S K R Impex vs.m/s Punj Lloyd Ltd
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h October, 2017 CS(COMM) 646/2016 M/S K R IMPEX ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Medhanshu Tripathi, Ms. Garima Tripathi and Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocates. versus M/S PUNJ LLOYD LTD ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. Shambhu Sharan and Ms. Divya Krishnan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.13472/2016 (under Section 5 and 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act by defendant) 1. Plaintiff filed the present suit for recovery of sum of 2,96,57,573/- along with interest pendent lite and future claiming that the plaintiff was the sub-contractor of the defendant and in this regard agreements were entered into between the parties. Based on the agreement/work order between the parties, plaintiff completed the work and job completion certificate was issued to the plaintiff, debt notes accepted by the defendant and TDS deducted. Since despite demands, the defendant failed to pay the dues of ...
Tag this Judgment!Si/Gd Shambhoo vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~11 to 14 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9359/2016 Date of decision:11. h October, 2017 SI/GD SHAMBHOO ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate with Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Prasanta Varma, CGSC. W.P.(C) 9360/2016 MUNDRIKA SHAH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate with Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Mr. Prasanta Varma, CGSC. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 9361/2016 GAFFAR KHAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate with Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through Mr. Prasanta Varma, CGSC. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P. (C) No.9359/2016+connected Page 1 of 14 W.P.(C) 9362/2016 SI/GD RAJINDER SINGH ....... Petitioner Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate with Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Prasanta Varma, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANN...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.ombir & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-307 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL2022011 and CM No.4720/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocate versus OMBIR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The claim case (MACT3652006) instituted on 14.07.2006 by the first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants) claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on account of death of their bachelor son, Amit Kumar, then aged 27 years, in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 03.06.2006 due to the negligent driving of a truck bearing registration no.UP-13L- 5342 admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant / insurance company (insurer) for the period in question.2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) after holding inquiry, by judgment dated 31.07.2010, awarded compensation in the total sum ...
Tag this Judgment!Balaji Enterprises vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * 63 & 64 + BALAJI ENTERPRISES IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3793/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Priyadarshi Manish, Ms Anjali J.Manish and Ms Nidhi Saini, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr P.C. Aggarwal and Mr J.Vijetha, Advocates W.P.(C) 3848/2017 ........ Petitioners + TATVIK EXPORTS & ORS. Through: Mr Priyadarshi Manish, Ms Anjali J.Manish and Ms Nidhi Saini, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus . ....... RESPONDENTS Through:Mr Rahul Jain, Govt. Pleader for R- 1/UOI Through: Mr P.C. Aggarwal and Mr J.Vijetha, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ORDER1110.2017 % 1. The grievance of the... Petitioners in these two writ petitions concerns the actions of the Respondent No.2 Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) in freezing the bank accounts of the... Petitioners pending issuance of W.P.(C) 3793/2017 & W.P.(C) 3848/2017 Page 1 of 7 a Show Cause Notice (SCN).2. In W.P.(C) 3793/2017 filed ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S s.p.s International Ltd. Vs.m/s s.cj Scanform Solution Pvt Ltd and ...
Court: Delhi
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 10.2017 CS(OS) 819/2011 M/S S.P.S INTERNATIONAL LTD versus M/S S.CJ SCANFORM SOLUTION PVT LTD AND ORS ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants : Mr. Pradeep Bhardwaj, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Ms. Risha Mittal, Adv. JUDGMENT1110.2017 1. The plaintiff has filed this suit, inter-alia, seeking permanent injunction, mandatory injunction and recovery of sum of Rs. 1,07,24,830/-.2. By order dated 17.03.2017, the parties were referred to mediation. The parties have arrived at a settlement through the process of mediation and the settlement agreement dated 07.07.2017 has been executed. The original settlement agreement has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The same is taken on record.3. The settlement agreement is signed by the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the plaintiff as well as...
Tag this Judgment!State Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.jagdish Tyagi
Court: Delhi
$~4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 11, 2017 CRL.A. 753/2017 STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State versus ..... Appellant JAGDISH TYAGI Through: M.K.K.Manan, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Ankush Narang & ..... Respondent PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.12229/2017 Mr.Manveen Dhanjal, Advocates 1. For the reasons stated in the application, 90 days delay in filing the appeal is condoned.2. Application is disposed of. Crl.A. No.753/2017 1. State is in appeal feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 24th November, 2016 and the sentence awarded to the respondent by learned ASJ-01 while disposing of Criminal Appeal No.8550/2016. Vide impugned judgment, the sentence awarded to the respondent by the learned ACMM in CC No.193/2012 has been reduced by the learned ASJ-01 as under: Sentence awarded by ACMM In CC No.193/2002 Sentence reduced by ASJ-01, New Delhi CA No.8550/2016 in Under Section 16(1A) r/w Section 7 of PFA...
Tag this Judgment!Feedback Infra Private Limited vs.sanjose Supreme Tollways Development ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h September, 2017 Pronounced on:11. h October, 2017 + CO.PET. 704/2016 FEEDBACK INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Rahul Malhotra, Mr.Varun Ms.Sanyogita, and Garg Advocates. versus SANJOSE SUPREME TOLLWAYS DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The... Petitioner is a leading integrated infrastructure services Company inter-alia offering end-to-end solutions in advisory, transactions, design, engineering, project management, operations and maintenance across energy, transportation and real estate industries.2. Pursuant to the respondent company executing a Concession Agreement with the Jaipur Development Authority for construction of the Jaipur link road on DBFOT basis, the respondent company had approached the petitioner to provide project management consultancy service, for which a PMC Agreement was executed between them ...
Tag this Judgment!Tatvik Exports & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * 63 & 64 + BALAJI ENTERPRISES IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3793/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Priyadarshi Manish, Ms Anjali J.Manish and Ms Nidhi Saini, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr P.C. Aggarwal and Mr J.Vijetha, Advocates W.P.(C) 3848/2017 ........ Petitioners + TATVIK EXPORTS & ORS. Through: Mr Priyadarshi Manish, Ms Anjali J.Manish and Ms Nidhi Saini, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus . ....... RESPONDENTS Through:Mr Rahul Jain, Govt. Pleader for R- 1/UOI Through: Mr P.C. Aggarwal and Mr J.Vijetha, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ORDER1110.2017 % 1. The grievance of the... Petitioners in these two writ petitions concerns the actions of the Respondent No.2 Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) in freezing the bank accounts of the... Petitioners pending issuance of W.P.(C) 3793/2017 & W.P.(C) 3848/2017 Page 1 of 7 a Show Cause Notice (SCN).2. In W.P.(C) 3793/2017 filed ...
Tag this Judgment!Krishan Kumar vs.baldev Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-309 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL2352011 KRISHAN KUMAR Through: versus Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate ..... Appellant BALDEV SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shah and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was the claimant before the tribunal in accident claim case (MACT103910/08) instituted on 19.04.2008 to seek compensation for the injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 18.02.2008 due to the negligent driving of a truck bearing registration no.HR-38G-9319 admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer).2. By judgment dated 29.01.2011, the tribunal accepted the said claim on principle of fault liability under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 holding the first respondent negligent in driving of the truck and, thus, also holding the second respondent vicariously liable, he bei...
Tag this Judgment!