Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 44 of about 590 results (0.009 seconds)New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.shambhu & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~18 & 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 491/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus SHAMBHU & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N.Parashar, Adv. for R-1 to R-3 Mr. Kameshwar Singh, Adv. with Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv. for R-4 + MAC.APP. 25/2011 KESHAV SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kameshwar Singh, Adv. with Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv. versus SHAMBHU & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for R-2 Mr.S.N.Parashar, Adv. for R-1 & R-3 MAC Appeal No.491/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Rajinder Singh @ Rajan, then 34 years old, a bachelor, living with his brother (the first respondent in these appeals) died in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 12.02.2006 due to the negligent driving of Truck bearing No.UP-78-AT-2586 which was admittedly insured against third party risk with New India Ass...
Tag this Judgment!Concrete Solutions vs.sany Heavy Industry India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h October, 2017. CM(M) 753/2017 CONCRETE SOLUTIONS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Sastry & Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Advs. Versus SANY HEAVY INDUSTRY INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amaresh K. Singh & Mr. Brijesh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Singh, Advs. On 24th July, 2017, when this petition came up first before this Court, 1. inter alia the following order was passed: CM(M) No.753/2017 & CM No.25715/2017 (for stay).5. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India though intended to impugn the order dated 6th April, 2017 in M. No.87of the Court of the Additional District Judge-01 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi, but in the prayer paragraph seeks setting aside of the order dated 4th July, 2017. There is however no order dated 4th July, 2017.6. The counsel for the petitioner to, in future, be careful and read before signing the petitions preferred in the Court.7. On an appli...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Mgs Super Speciality Hospital vs.district Appropriate Authority-Pn ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment delivered on:12. h October, 2017 + W.P.(C) 1021/2017 M/S MGS SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL ........ Petitioner versus DISTRICT APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY-PNDT I DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (WEST DISTRICT) + W.P.(C) 3895/2017 ..... Respondent M/S MGS SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL ........ Petitioner DISTRICT APPROPRIATE AUTHORITYI DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (WEST DISTRICT) versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sandeep P. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Raman Duggal, Standing Counsel with Ms. Aayushi Gupta, Mr. Arun Kr. Panwar, Mr. Akshay Choudhary, Adv. and Dr. Souharda Nath, Nodal Officer for GNCTD, Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC for GNCTD in W.P.(C) 1021/2017 Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC for GNCTD in W.P.(C) 3895/2017 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT WP(C) 1021/2017 & WP(C) 3895/2017 Page 1 of 33 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J W.P.(C) 1021/2017& CM No.4672/2017...
Tag this Judgment!Gargi Adhikari vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7912/2016, CM No.32746/2016 GARGI ADHIKARI ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Mr.Vaibhav Vats and Ms.Soumya Maheshwari, Advs. Versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray and Ms. ..... Respondent Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In view of the facts & circumstances stated above, it is prayed that this Honble Court in public interest may be pleased to:1. issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction thereby quashing and setting aside the report of the High Level Enquiry Committee set up by the respondent vide Office Order No.208/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 of the Vice Chancellor punishing the petitioner, W.P.(C) No.7912/2016 Page 1 of 41 and all other proceedings consequential to and arising out of the report of the High Leve...
Tag this Judgment!Mujeeb Hussain Gattoo vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P. (C) 7942/2016, CM No.32966/2016 MUJEEB HUSSAIN GATTOO ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Ms. Warisha Farasat, Mr. Ahmed Said, Ms. Rudrakshi Deo & Mr. Vibhor Jain, Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased a. Call for the records of the High Level Enquiry Committee (HLEC) & the Appellate Authority constituted by the Respondent, b. Issue a writ of certiorari, or other appropriate writ, quashing the Office Order No.199/CP/2016, dated W.P.(C) No.7942/2016 Page 1 of 47 22.08.2016 of the Chief Proctor and the Appellate Authority of the Respondent University, c. Issue a writ of certiorari, or other appro...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj @ Tinky vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~14 -15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on :13. h September, 2017 Judgement pronounced on :12. h October, 2017 + BAIL APPLN. 806/2017 VIPIN ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr.Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta and Ms. Tamanna, Advocates. Versus STATE ..Respondent Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State with SI Arvind Kumar, Police Station Sabzi Mandi, Delhi. BAIL APPLN.1459/2017 + MANOJ @ TINKY ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar with Mr. Surender Gupta, Advoctae. Versus STATE ..Respondent Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State with SI Arvind Kumar, P.S. Sabzi Mandi, Delhi CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 By this common order, I shall dispose of the petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.'), whereby the petitioners seek grant of Regular Bail in FIR No.167/2015 under Section 376D of the Bail Appln. 806/2017 and 1459/2017 Page 1 of 7 ...
Tag this Judgment!Umar Khalid vs.jawaharlal Nehru University Thr Its Registrar
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7826/2016, CM No.32348/2016 UMAR KHALID Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Mr. Jawahar ........ Petitioner(s) Raja, Mr. Sourav Roy, Ms. Jahnavi Mitra and Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY THR ITS REGISTRAR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray, Ms. Kanchan Kaur Dhodhi and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In the facts and circumstances set out above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court be pleased to: a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records, quash and set aside respondents W.P.(C) No.7826/2016 Page 1 of 58 2. i) ii) Office Order No.198/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016; Appellate Committee proceedings dated Nil, based on which Office Order No.198/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 came t...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Prime Production Pvt Ltd vs.sanjeev Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 CS(COMM) 643/2016 M/S PRIME PRODUCTION PVT LTD .... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Davinder Singh Khatana, Adv. with AR of the Plaintiff. versus .....Defendants Represented by: None. SANJEEV KUMAR & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Plaintiff is confining the present suit for grant of the following reliefs: dealers, distributors, i. A decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant No.1 and 2, its directors, proprietors or the partners as the case may be, its principal officers, servants, agents, representatives, licensees and all others acting for and on behalf of Defendants from mentioning/ listing in list and exhibiting, broadcasting, re- broadcasting, screening, communicating to the public and telecasting the movies mentioned in the list in question the cable TV rights of which are vested with the plaintiff. their ii. A decree of permanent injunction restraining De...
Tag this Judgment!Anwesha Chakraborty vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7914/2016, CM No.32751/2016 ANWESHA CHAKRABORTY ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Mr.Vaibhav Vats and Ms.Soumya Maheshwari, Advs. Versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In view of the facts & circumstances stated above, it is prayed that this Honble Court in public interest may be pleased to:1. issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction thereby quashing and setting aside the report of the High Level Enquiry Committee set up by the W.P.(C) No.7914/2016 Page 1 of 35 respondent vide Office Order No.203/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 of the Vice Chancellor punishing the petitioner, and all other proceedings consequential to and arising out of the report of the High ...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance. Co. Ltd. Vs.smt. Laxmina Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.975/2015 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vinod Trisal, Adv. versus SMT. LAXMINA DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Yadav & Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Adv. for R-1 t 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The only issue pressed at the hearing by the appellant insurance company is that since the accident had occurred in Ghaziabad, there being no proof on record showing the deceased was an ordinary resident of District Ghaziabad UP in calculating the loss of dependency, the tribunal should have adopted the minimum wages of UP rather than that of the Union Territory of Delhi. This plea cannot be accepted in view of the evidence on record, inter alia, also showing that the deceased and the claimants had been residents of village Ghazipur within the territory of Delhi and further that he was earning his livelihood as a hawker of fruits and...
Tag this Judgment!