Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 41 of about 590 results (0.024 seconds)Sunil vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUNIL STATE Date of Decision:13. 10.2017 BAIL APPLN. 1614/2017 Through: Mr.Pranay Abhishek, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus Through: Mr.Amit Chadha, APP for State with ASI Ram Kumar, PS Old Delhi Railway Station, Delhi. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOG GOEL, J.(Oral) 1. Apprehending his arrest in a case registered vide FIR No.0267/2015 dated 14.04.2015 under Section 379 IPC, PS RMD Main (ODRS), District Crime & Railways, Delhi, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest under Section 438 of the Code of 2.3. Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) Status report has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the name of the petitioner has figured only in the Bail Appln. 1614/2017 Page 1 of 5 disclosure statement of the co-accused.4. Per contra, learned APP vehemently ...
Tag this Judgment!Mohan Lal Manda vs.ganga Ram Sakh
Court: Delhi
$~51 & 52 + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. M.C. 2029/2016 and Crl. M. A. Nos. 8591/2016 (Stay) and 14788/2017 MOHAN LAL MANDA ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. GANGA RAM SAKH Versus .Respondent Through: Mr. Vishesh Verma, Advocate. CRL. M.C. 2030/2016 and Crl. M. A. Nos. 8593/2016 (Stay) and 14790/2017 MOHAN LAL MANDA ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. GANGA RAM SAKH Versus .Respondent Through: Mr. Vishesh Verma, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER1310.2017 1. These petitions have been filed under Section 482 Cr.PC assailing the order dated 24.02.2015 passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Karkardooma, Delhi whereby an application under Section 45 of the Evidence Act dated 04.01.2013 and an application dated under Section 311 Cr.PC dated 22.11.2014 brought by the petitioners were dismissed and also Crl. MC. 2029/2016 and 2030/2016 Page 1 of 8 order dated 12.10.2015 passed by Special Judge (NDPS) ...
Tag this Judgment!V.k. Sharma vs.uma Shankar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-325 to R-327 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL3842011 V.K. SHARMA .... Appellant Through: Mr. S.M. Suri, Advocate versus RAJWATI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya for Mr. + MAC APPEAL3882011 K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for R-8 V.K. SHARMA .... Appellant Through: Mr. S.M. Suri, Advocate versus UMA SHANKAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya for Mr. + MAC APPEAL3922011 K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for R-3 V.K. SHARMA .... Appellant Through: Mr. S.M. Suri, Advocate versus SUMAN SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya for Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for R-3 MAC Appeal No.384/11, 388/11, 3Page 1 of 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) On 10.07.2005, a motor vehicular accident took place involving 1. two vehicles, one being Maruti Van bearing registration no.DL-2CR- 9406 (van) and, the other, a stationary bus bearing registration no.DL- 1PB-3966 (bus) i...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak Bharadwaj & Anr vs.sudha Rani & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: October 13, 2017 CM(M) 823/2013 DEEPAK BHARADWAJ & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Verma & Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Baghel Advocates alongwith petitioner in person. Versus SUDHA RANI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhir Kr. Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioners were impleaded as first and second respondents in the accident claim case (suit No.301/10) instituted on 03.10.2007 by the respondents joining hands with Jai Kumar Singh father of Alok Kumar Singh, the person on account of whose death the accident claim case sought compensation, the cause of action having arisen out of motor vehicular accident that took place on 08.07.2007 involving negligent driving of motor vehicle bearing registration No.CM(M) 823/2013 Page 1 of 3 DL3CS6805. The first petitioner was described as the driver of the vehicle at the time of accident and the second petitioner as the owner of...
Tag this Judgment!Amit & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % AMIT & ORS. FAO No.402/2015 12th October, 2017 Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Raj Kumar Bhartiya, Adv. for A-1 to 5. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Atul Kumar Jain, Adv. for CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA R-2 to 5. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 impugning the judgment of the trial court which has dismissed the petition filed by the appellants herein for grant of probate of the Will dated 8.5.2003 of late Smt. Savitri Devi. Smt. Savitri Devi had a son named Sh. Radhey Shyam, who had expired, and the appellants (petitioners in the court below) are the legal heirs of the deceased Sh. Radhey Shyam. By the impugned judgment the probate petition has been dismissed as being barred by limitation. FAO No.402/2015 Page 1 of 4 2. No doubt, in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in ...
Tag this Judgment!Reyazul Haque vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7917/2016, CM No.32762/2016 REYAZUL HAQUE ........ Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Mr.Vaibhav Vats and Ms.Soumya Maheshwari, Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Routray, Adv. with Ms. Anusha Ashok, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In view of the facts & circumstances stated above, it is prayed that this Honble Court in public interest may be pleased to:1. issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction thereby quashing and setting aside the report of the High Level Enquiry Committee set up by the respondent vide Office Order No.204/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 of the Vice Chancellor punishing the petitioner, W.P.(C) No.7917/2016 Page 1 of 38 and all other proceedings consequential to and arising out of the report of the Hig...
Tag this Judgment!Shweta Raj vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7943/2016, CM No.32968/2016 SHWETA RAJ ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Suroor Mander, Adv. Versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Routray, Ms. Anushka Ashok & Ms. Bhavna Pal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"Petitioner respectfully prays that this Honble Court may be pleased to:-"(i) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order vide Office Order No.206/CP/2016 dated 22 August 2016 by the Chief Proctor of the University imposing punishment on... Petitioner No.1 of a fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) and the W.P.(C) No.7943/2016 Page 1 of 40 requirement of furnishing an undertaking; and ii). Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Order No.154/CP/2016 dated 25 April 2016 by the Chief Proctor of the Univers...
Tag this Judgment!Pramod Kumar Goil vs.state
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:12. h October, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 631/2017 & CRL.M.A. (Bail) 637/2017 PRAMOD KUMAR GOIL ..... Applicant STATE Through: Mr.Vikas Pahwa Sr. Advocate, Mr.Gurpreet Singh, Ms. Kinnori Ghosh & Mr. Tushar Aggarwal, Advocates versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, APP for State with Inspector Nitin Kumar E.O.W. Mandir Marg, New Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 By way of the above captioned application, the applicant seeks regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in the case FIR No.268/2009 dated 26.12.2009, under Sections 406/420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station- Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi. BAIL APPLN. 631/2017 Page 1 of 13 2. In the instant application, the applicant is in judicial custody since 29.11.2016 and the charge sheet has been filed in the learned Trial Court on 24.02.2017.3. The brief facts stated are that the applicant/accused is one of the di...
Tag this Judgment!Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd vs.narayan Tiwari and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 462/2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.K. Nayyar, Adv. for R-1 &2 versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA NARAYAN TIWARI AND ORS JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, a bachelor, 24 years old, son of the first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants) died due to the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 06.01.2012 due to the negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as one bearing no.UP-16P-9482 by respondent no.3 herein admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant / insurance company (insurer). On the accident claim petition (suit no.81/2012) jointly instituted by the claimants on 03.02.2012, it having been clubbed with another similarly placed case on account of death of Mohd. Tanveer, which had occurred in the same accident,...
Tag this Judgment!Anirban Bhattacharya vs.jawaharlal Nehru University Thr Its Registrar ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7828/2016, CM No.32352/2016 ANIRBAN BHATTACHARYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Trideep Pais and Ms. Vrinda Bhandari, Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY THR ITS REGISTRAR JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray, Ms. Kanchan Kaur Dhodhi and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In the facts and circumstances set out above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court be pleased to: a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records, quash and set aside respondents i) ii) Office Order No.197/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016; Appellate Committee proceedings dated Nil, based W.P.(C) No.7828/2016 Page 1 of 53 2. on which Office Order No.197/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 came to be passed; iii) ...
Tag this Judgment!