Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 45 of about 590 results (0.018 seconds)Baldev Raj vs.the Management of Dtc & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:01. t September, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:12. h October, 2017. + W.P.(C) NO.15785/2004 BALDEV RAJ ....... Petitioner Through: Mr.K.C. Chandra Dubey, Adv. Versus THE MANAGEMENT OF DTC & ANR. ......Respondents Through: Mr.U.N. Tiwari and Mr.S.K. Ojha, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT1210.2017 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. Baldev Raj petitioner before me and Conductor with the respondent- Corporation before he was shown the door on 3rd July, 1990 has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction, conferred on this Court by Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, against orders dated 23rd February, 2004 and 5th April, 2004, passed by the Labour Court No.1, Karkardooma, Delhi.2. The opinion which I propose to take, in the present case, obviates the necessity of any exhaustive allusion to facts. (Indeed, any such allusion would advisably merit eschewal, lest it prejudices the case of either party.) The ...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sonia Mittal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~9 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.1043/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. versus SONIA MITTAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv. for R1 to 3. Mr. Pramod Pandey, Adv. for R-4 & 5. + MAC APPEAL No.1044/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. versus LRS OF SHANKAR MITTAL & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv. for R1 to 3. Mr. Pramod Pandey, Adv. for R-4 & 5. + MAC APPEAL No.1048/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. versus AMOGH MITTAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv. for R1 to 3. MAC Appeal No.1043/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 8 Mr. Pramod Pandey, Adv. for R-4 & 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 17.02.2012, Shankar Mittal with his wife Sonia Mittal and minor son Amogh Mittal were going in a car bearin...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. G Purshottam vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
$~45 & 46 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1176/2017 SH. G PURSHOTTAM .Petitioner Through: Mr. Munnipalle Sowri Dev, Advocate. CBI Versus ....Respondent Through: Ms Rajdipa, SPP for CBI with Ms. Kriti Handa, Mr. Philomon Kani, Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat and Ms. Karnika Singh, Advocates. BAIL APPLN. 1245/2017 S SUBASH ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate. CBI versus Through: Ms Rajdipa, SPP for CBI with Ms. Kriti Handa, Mr. Philomon Kani, Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat and Ms. Karnika Singh, Advocates. ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER1210.2017 1. By this present petition filed under Section 438 Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C) the petitioners seeks Anticipatory Bail in RC No.05 (A)/2017/CBI/AC-III/New Delhi under Section 120-B IPC, Section 7,8,12,13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (herein referred as PC, Act) registered at New Delhi, Police Station- AC- III against Lt. Col...
Tag this Judgment!State of Nct of Delhi vs.bhanwar Singh
Court: Delhi
Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State ........ Petitioner STATE OF NCT OF DELHI with SI Vikar Rana, PS Fatehpur Beri, Delhi. BHANWAR SINGH ..... Respondent versus $~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 10.2017 CRL.L.P. 508/2017 Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) 1. This Leave to Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment dated 12.02.2016 passed by the Court of MM-01, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in FIR no.whereby the respondent was acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC).2. Facts leading to the filing of the present Leave to Appeal are that on 22.01.2015 at about 5 PM, the respondent who is the landlord of house bearing no.203/1, Bhopa Mohalla, Fateh Beri under the jurisdiction of PS Fatehpur Beri was found to have not got verified the details of his tenant from the police in accordance with Order no.67397-496/SD(X) dated 22.12.2014 ...
Tag this Judgment!Vikas Chadha vs.state (Govt of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h October, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 2038/2017 VIKAS CHADHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rishi Pal Singh, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Chadha, APP for the State with SI Vikas, PS Patel Nagar, Delhi. Mr.Vipul Srivastava, Adv. with Mr.Rajindra Vats, Adv. for Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. 16678/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 2038/2017 1. Notice. Learned APP for the State, who appears on advance copy having been served, accepts notice.2. Apprehending his arrest in a case registered against him and his wife Smt.Aarti Chadha vide FIR No.95/2017 dated 18.03.2017, PS Patel Nagar, Central District, Delhi under Sectionof Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC), the petitioner has Bail Application No.2038/2017 Page 1 of 7 approached this court for granting him ant...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.amogh Mittal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~9 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.1043/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. versus SONIA MITTAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv. for R1 to 3. Mr. Pramod Pandey, Adv. for R-4 & 5. + MAC APPEAL No.1044/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. versus LRS OF SHANKAR MITTAL & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv. for R1 to 3. Mr. Pramod Pandey, Adv. for R-4 & 5. + MAC APPEAL No.1048/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. versus AMOGH MITTAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv. for R1 to 3. MAC Appeal No.1043/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 8 Mr. Pramod Pandey, Adv. for R-4 & 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 17.02.2012, Shankar Mittal with his wife Sonia Mittal and minor son Amogh Mittal were going in a car bearin...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Mgs Super Speciality Hospital vs.district Appropriate Authority / ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment delivered on:12. h October, 2017 + W.P.(C) 1021/2017 M/S MGS SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL ........ Petitioner versus DISTRICT APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY-PNDT I DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (WEST DISTRICT) + W.P.(C) 3895/2017 ..... Respondent M/S MGS SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL ........ Petitioner DISTRICT APPROPRIATE AUTHORITYI DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (WEST DISTRICT) versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sandeep P. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Raman Duggal, Standing Counsel with Ms. Aayushi Gupta, Mr. Arun Kr. Panwar, Mr. Akshay Choudhary, Adv. and Dr. Souharda Nath, Nodal Officer for GNCTD, Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC for GNCTD in W.P.(C) 1021/2017 Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC for GNCTD in W.P.(C) 3895/2017 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT WP(C) 1021/2017 & WP(C) 3895/2017 Page 1 of 33 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J W.P.(C) 1021/2017& CM No.4672/2017...
Tag this Judgment!Komal Mohite vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P. (C) 7913/2016, CM No.32748/2016 KOMAL MOHITE ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Malavika Rajkotia, Mr. Vaibhav Vats and Ms. Soumya Maheshwari, Advs. Versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In view of the facts & circumstances stated above, it is prayed that this Honble Court in public interest may be pleased to:1. issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction thereby quashing and setting aside the report of the High Level Enquiry Committee set up by the respondent vide Office Order No.201/CP/2016 dated W.P.(C) No.7913/2016 Page 1 of 43 22.8.2016 of the Vice Chancellor punishing the petitioner, and all other proceedings consequential to and arising out of the report of the High L...
Tag this Judgment!Balaraj Jadhav & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)No.11837/2015, CM Nos. 31446/2015, 5331/2016, 43454/2016 17381/2016, 43435/2016, 46077/2016 & 17519/2016 % Reserved on :28. h August, 2017 Date of decision :12. h October 2017 BALARAJ JADHAV & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Govind Jee and Mr. Devesh Kumar Agnihotri, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Mr. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Seerat Singh and Mr. Aditya Goyal, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Yakesh Anand and Nimit Mathur, Advs. for R- 2/ESIC. Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP Mr. Philomon Kani, Ms. Kriti Handa and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. for R3/CBI. Mr. T.Singhdev, Mr. Tarun Verma and Ms. Biakthansangi, Advs. for R-4/MCI. with W.P.(C)No.11837/2015 Page 1 of 38 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The present writ petition, has been instituted in public interest, under Article 226 o...
Tag this Judgment!Sap Se & Ors vs.transweave Solutions Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Ms. Astha Joshi, Advocate ..... Plaintiffs ..... Defendants versus CS(OS) 325/2013 SAP SE & ORS $~ * + % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN TRANSWEAVE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD & ANR Through: None Date of Decision:12. h October, 2017 MANMOHAN, J (ORAL): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts of profit, damages and delivery up etc. The prayer clause in the suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"(a) An order of Permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their principal officers, directors, agents, franchisees, servants and all other acting for and on their belief, from directly or indirectly reproducing/installing, providing training on software programs of the plaintiffs, including but not limited to SAP IS Retail module, SAP R/3, SAP ERP2005 including the use of all training CS (OS) 325/2013 Page 1 of 9 manuals published by the plaintif...
Tag this Judgment!