Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Dalbir Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:13. h October, 2017 CRL.REV.P. 394/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 991/2017 DALBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Gigi C George, Adv. STATE versus Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for ..... Respondent State with SI Amit Mann, PS-Defence Colony CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I.S. MEHTA, J.1. The instant revision petition is preferred by the petitioner under SectionsCr.P.C. for setting aside the impugned judgment dated 28.04.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-02, South-East, Saket Courts, New Delhi in criminal appeal No.204266/2016, conviction judgment dated 26.11.2015 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate- 09, South-East District, Saket, New Delhi and order on sentence dated 09.02.2016 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-09, South-East District, Saket, New Delhi in FIR No.1titled as State Vs. Dalbir Singh. CRL.REV.P. 394/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 991/2017 Page 1 of 5 2. Brief facts sta...
Tag this Judgment!Bharat Bhushan Jain vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :15. h SEPTEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :13. h OCTOBER, 2017 + TEST.CAS. 82/1987 & IA Nos.47(delay in filing list of witnesses), 48(additional document), 2(under O- 18 R-17) & 90(u/O15R-5 CPC) ........ Petitioner BHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN THE STATE & ORS versus Through : Mr.V.K.Srivastava with Mr.Abhay Jain, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Shalini Kapoor with Ms.R.Dey, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The present petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 has been preferred by Jain Society For The Protection Of Orphans For India, Darya Ganj, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the petitioner) for grant of letters of administration in respect of Will dated 15.10.1977 executed by late Ratan Lal Jain.2. It is averred that Ratan Lal Jain had executed his last Will and testament on 15.10.1977. Ratan Lal Jain has since expired on 04.03.1978 at Delhi. By the said Will, Ratan Lal Jain the tes...
Tag this Judgment!Sukhdev Jain vs.modern School & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 13, 2017 + W.P.(C) 5629/2017 SUKHDEV JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Tibah Siddiqui, Adv. versus MODERN SCHOOL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Raavi Birbal, Adv. for R1. Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv. for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R A L V. KAMESWAR RAO, J The challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated November 02, 1. 2016 passed by the Delhi School Tribunal in Appeal No.28/2013, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner herein against the penalty of removal from service was imposed on her.2. Some of the relevant facts are, the petitioner was appointed as TGT on October 16, 1998 in the respondent No.1 School. On April 15, 2005, a charge sheet was issued to the petitioner. The charge sheet culminated in a penalty of removal imposed on the petitioner on March 16, 2006. The removal was a subject matter of Appeal No.37/2007 before the Delhi School Tribunal, whi...
Tag this Judgment!Hari Shankar Raikwar & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-2017
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1671/2017 & Crl.M.A. 9258/2017 (stay) 1.2. HARI SHANKAR RAIKWAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms.Gulshan Jahan, Advocate with Mr.Surya Kamal Mishra, Advocate for petitioners along with petitioner No.1 and 2 in person. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for State with Mr.Prem Sagar Pal and Mr.Bhagat Singh, Advocates along with SI Gopal Singh, PS Mehrauli, Delhi. Mr.Rizwan Ali, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER1310.2017 Status report has already been filed. Respondent No.2 appears in person. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO SI Gopal Singh.3. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the FIR bearing No.0806/2015, registered against them on 21.03.2015 with Police Station Mehrauli, District South, Delh...
Tag this Judgment!Vijay Kumar vs.alka Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.712/2017 and C.M. No.35552/2017 (for directions % VIJAY KUMAR ALKA KAPOOR13h October, 2017 Through: Mr. ..... Appellant Nanavaty, Shekhar Advocate. versus Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. .... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 4.7.2017 by which trial court has decreed one relief claimed in the suit of possession and has by the self-same impugned judgment held that so far as the aspect of awarding of mense profits/damages is concerned, further enquiry will be held. The suit property is property bearing no.RZ-100, Vashist Park, Gali No.26, Pankha Road, New Delhi admeasuring 111 sq. yards RFA No.712/2017 Page 1 of 10 out of Khasra no.23/8, situated in the village Dabri, New Delhi now...
Tag this Judgment!V.k. Sharma vs.suman Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-2017
$~R-325 to R-327 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL3842011 V.K. SHARMA .... Appellant Through: Mr. S.M. Suri, Advocate versus RAJWATI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya for Mr. + MAC APPEAL3882011 K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for R-8 V.K. SHARMA .... Appellant Through: Mr. S.M. Suri, Advocate versus UMA SHANKAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya for Mr. + MAC APPEAL3922011 K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for R-3 V.K. SHARMA .... Appellant Through: Mr. S.M. Suri, Advocate versus SUMAN SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya for Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for R-3 MAC Appeal No.384/11, 388/11, 3Page 1 of 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) On 10.07.2005, a motor vehicular accident took place involving 1. two vehicles, one being Maruti Van bearing registration no.DL-2CR- 9406 (van) and, the other, a stationary bus bearing registration no.DL- 1PB-3966 (bus) i...
Tag this Judgment!Navayuga Engineering Company Limited vs.ntpc Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-2017
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 265/2017 Judgment delivered on:13. 10.2017 NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED......... Petitioner versus NTPC LIMITED Advocates who appeared in this case: ..Respondent For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Abhinav Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Mr Milanka Chaudhury, Ms Naina Dubey and Ms Priya. : Mr Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Ms Kanika Agnihotri, Mr Preet Singh Oberoi with Mr Shankar Anand, Senior Manager, Law for NTPC. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1310.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition, under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to restitute/refund the amount of Rs.6,83,16,562/- recovered by the respondent by invoking/encashing the bank guarantee No.1303910BG0001940 dated 01.12.2005. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 265/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. It is contended that an Award wa...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co Ltd vs.sunil Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-2017
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL3092016 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD .... Appellant Through: None. versus SUNIL KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.R. Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) The first respondent (claimant) on 20.07.2015 had instituted accident claim case (suit No.215/15) seeking compensation under Section 166 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 for injuries and permanent disability suffered on account of motor vehicle accident that had occurred on 05.06.2015 involving bus registration No.DL1PC9649 of Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), admittedly insured against third party risk for period in question with the appellant insurance company (insurer). The tribunal held inquiry and found that the accident had occurred due to negligent driving of the DTC bus by its employee (second respondent/driver). It also found that the claimant had suffered permanent disabili...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.javed Khan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-2017
$~R-335 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL4102011 Decided on:13. h October, 2017 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus JAVED KHAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The tribunal, by its judgment dated 25.01.2011, while deciding accident claim case (suit no.476/2010) of the first respondent seeking compensation for the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 02.08.2006, fastened the liability on the insurance company / appellant (insurer) of the offending vehicle to pay the compensation thereby determined rejecting its plea of breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy on the ground that the second respondent (driver) was not holding a valid or effective driving licence. It is the denial of this plea which is assailed by the appeal at hand.2. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and having gone ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Jaya Tiwari & Anr vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-2017
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1715/2017 1.2. SMT JAYA TIWARI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.S.S. Tomar, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Piyush Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with SI Pawan Kumar, PS Vijay Vihar, Delhi. Respondent No.2 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER1310.2017 Status report has already been filed.... RESPONDENTS No.2 and 3 appear in person. They are duly identified by IO SI Pawan Kumar.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the FIR in question bearing No.0907/2015 was registered on 05.07.2015 with PS Vijay Vihar, District Outer, Delhi under Section 420/468/471/120B/34 IPC against Prashant Tiwari (since deceased), his wife Jaya Tiwari, Balram Tiwari and Arpit Rai. He submits that the whereabouts of Arpit Rai are not known and he could not be joined as petitioner but was joined as respondent No.4. He su...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »