Delhi Court August 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 18 of about 306 results (0.018 seconds)Rampal Yadav and ors Vs. the State and ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3533/2014 ..... Petitioners RAMPAL YADAV & ORS Through Mr. Rahul, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ORS Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.12182/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.3533/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.44/2014 dated 16.01.2014 registered under Section 420, 468, 471 IPC at Police Station Jahangir Puri, on the ground that the matter has been compromise between the parties. A copy of the Compromise Deed executed between the parties on 30.05.2014 has been annexed to this petition. It is further stated that the original deed has been duly filed in the court of Sh. Narender Singh, SDMJ, Ganaur, Haryana in Civil Suit No.152/2011, which has also been duly settled and withdrawn in terms of the aforesaid compromise.2. Issu...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h August, 2014. % + W.P.(C) 1771/2012 & CM No.14784/2013 (for direction) ASHOK SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sachit Sahijpal, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Richa Shandilya, Adv. for Mr. Ravinder Aggarwal, Advocate for R-1/UOI. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra and Mr. P. Sinha, Advocates for R-2, 3 & 11. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition filed in public interest in or about March, 2012 seeks, (i) a direction to the respondent No.4 Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) to proceed/resume investigating the matter under Complaint No.1605/09/6; (ii) a direction to the CVC to investigate in an effective manner with positive attitude the misdeeds of the respondent No.2 Sh. S. Roy Choudhury, Chairman & Managing Director (CMD) of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) and all other official...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Ramwati and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h August, 2014 % + LPA No.227/2014 & CM No.4515/2014 (for interim directions). SMT RAMWATI & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. S. S. Panwar with Mr. Nivedita Panwar, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr. B. Mahapatra, Adv. AND + LPA No.228/2014 & CM No.4529/2014 (for filing additional documents) and CM No.4530/2014 (for stay). SHRI DAL CHAND Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S. S. Panwar with Mr. Nivedita Panwar, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr. B. Mahapatra, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 These intra-court appeals impugn the common order dated 22nd November, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.7311/2013 & W.P.(C) No.7310/2013 filed by the appellants respectively on account of inordinate delay and laches.2. The land of the appellant in LPA No.228/2014 was acquired vide La...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Videocon Industries Ltd. Vs. M/S. Audio-vision (India)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: August 11, 2014 + CS(OS) No.1022/2010 M/s. Videocon Industries Ltd. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.M.L. Sharma, Adv. versus M/s. Audio-Vision (India) Through ..... Defendant None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This is a suit for recovery filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for a sum of Rs.20,91,720/- alongwith pendente lite and future interest. The defendant is ex-parte by order dated 7th May, 2012.2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff is the manufacturer and seller of various kinds of electronic and electric products. Defendant No.1 is the proprietary concern of defendant No.2 who is engaged in the business of sales and purchase of various electronics and electric items.3. It is the case of the plaintiff that defendant No.2 approached the plaintiff to sell its products to the defendants on credit basis in the name of defendant No.1 to which the plaintiff agreed. Pursuant the...
Tag this Judgment!Poonam Gupta Vs. Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. h August, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.1368 /2014 POONAM GUPTA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Tanuj Khurana and Mr. Ankur, Advocates. Versus GNCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr. Puneet Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Counter-affidavit filed by the respondent is on record.2. Mr. Tanuj Khurana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner does not wish to file rejoinder to the same.3. Pleadings are complete.4. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is taken up for disposal.5. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned order dated11.09.2013, whereby the Dy. Secretary, Land & Building Department, (Task Force/Alt. Branch), Govt. of NCT of Delhi, rejected the petitioners case for allotment of alternative plot in lieu of Sub. Regarding allotment of alternative p...
Tag this Judgment!Management of M/S Directorate of Health Services D Vs. Yogender Kumar ...
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. h August, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.4460/2013 MANAGEMENT OF M/S DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES DELHI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel and Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate. Versus YOGENDER KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Neelam Tiwari and Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 8. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) W.P.(C) No.4460/2013 1. The present petition has arisen from the award dated 19.05.2010 passed by the learned Labour Court, Kakardooma Courts Delhi, in I.D. No.1217/06, whereby the reference dated 25.10.2006 made by the Appropriate Government has been adjudicated.2. Admittedly, claim petition filed by the respondents was allowed with reinstatement vide aforesaid award dated 19.05.2010.3. Being aggrieved, the petitioner herein challenged the same by filing W.P.(C) No.247/2011, which was allowed by this Court vide judgment dated 06....
Tag this Judgment!Savitri Devi and ors Vs. State of Govt. of Nct and ors
Court: Delhi
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. h August, 2014 + W.P.(C) 7941/2013 SAVITRI DEVI & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Raj Kumar Sehrawat, Adv. Versus STATE OF GOVT. OF NCT & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Jayendra, Adv. for R-1 and 3. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners are seeking directions against respondents to issue formal letter of NOC and for direction against the respondent No.3, i.e. Sub-Registrar to execute the sale deed as and when presented by the petitioners.2. Mr.Raj Kumar Sehrawat, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners made an application under Section 8 of Delhi Land (Restriction on Transfer) Act, 1972 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act), the same is as under:Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, where any document required t...
Tag this Judgment!Abrar Ali Vs. Cisf and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1241/2011 & CM APPL. No.12349/2012 ABRAR ALI ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. L.S. Chaudhary, Advocate Versus CISF AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Geeta Sharma, & Mr. Ishan Sanghi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % 11.08.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India feeling aggrieved by the order dated 28.11.2000 passed by the Disciplinary Authority thereby directing his dismissal from the Forces with immediate effect. The petitioner has also assailed the order dated 01.02.2001 passed by the Appellate Authority rejecting his appeal against the order of the Disciplinary Authority and order dated 31.12.2010 passed by the Revisional Authority whereby his revision petition was dismissed.2. The petitioner was posted as a Constable in CISF, BCCL Unit, Dhanbad. He proceeded on a 2 days casual ...
Tag this Judgment!Gurudwara Shri Guru Singh Sabha and ors. Vs. S.Harvinder Pal Singh and ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 742/2014 & C.M.No.12944-12945/2014 % AUGUST11 2014 GURUDWARA SHRI GURU SINGH SABHA & ORS. ......Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajesh Gogna, Advocate. VERSUS S.HARVINDER PAL SINGH & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms.Naina Kejriwal, Advocate for R9. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order of the trial court dated 02.7.2014 by which the trial court has directed the petitioners/defendants to conduct fresh election of petitioner no.1/body after inducting members in the petitioner no.1/defendant no.1/society.2. A reading of the impugned order shows that the Gurudwara in question was built upon an encroached public land. After building the Gurudwara, much later a society was registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and control of the Gurudwara thereafter vested in the society. It is not ...
Tag this Judgment!Reshma Devi Vs. Goct. of Nct and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. h August, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.6870 /2013 RESHMA DEVI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajender Yadav, Advocate. Versus GOCT. OF NCT & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Raavi Birbal and Mr. Nishant Anand, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Ms.Monica Kapoor, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking modification in the award dated 23.03.2012, passed by the Presiding Officer Labour Court-IX, Kakardooma Courts Delhi, in I.D. No.799/2009, titled as Sh.Shyam Kataria Vs. M/s Shyam Fruit Co.,.2. The petitioner is also seeking direction to pay full back wages at the rate of minimum wages from the date of termination of services of the deceased workman to her, i.e., wife of the deceased workman.3. Admittedly, the claim petition was filed by the respondent workman before the learned Labour Court on 21.12.2009 and th...
Tag this Judgment!