Delhi Court August 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 22 of about 306 results (0.008 seconds)Mehboob Khan and ors Vs. the State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3480/2014 MEHBOOB KHAN & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Deevesh Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. SI Rahul Kumar, CAW Cell, Seelampur. Ms. Kirti Madan, Advocate with R2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that FIR No.359/2008 under Section 498-A , 406, 34 IPC read with Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at Police Station Seelampur, and all the proceedings emanating therefrom, be quashed since the parties have settled the matter amongst themselves in terms of a settlement agreement 0accorded before the Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Court, Delhi on 04.03.2014 where the matter was referred by the Metropolitan Magistrate hearing a complaint under Section 125 Cr.P.C. instituted by the second response against the first ...
Tag this Judgment!The Instalment Supply Ltd. Vs. Khaitan Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: August 08, 2014 I.A. Nos.940/2013, 4073/2013, 15033/2013, 2185/2014 in CS(OS) No.989/2012 THE INSTALMENT SUPPLY LTD .....Plaintiff Through Mr.Sudhanshu Batra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhishek Sharma & Mr.Yash Srivastava, Advs. versus KHAITAN HOTELS PVT LTD. & ANR ..Defendants Through Mr.Vikas Dhawan, Adv. with Mr.S.P.Das, Adv. for D-1. Mr.Amit Verma, Adv. with GP Capt. Karan Singh Bhati, Adv. for D-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.940/2013 (u/o VIII R.10 CPC, by plaintiff), I.A. No.4073/2013 (u/o VIII R.1 CPC, by defendant No.1), I.A. No.15033/2013 (for condonation of delay in filing the written statement, by defendant No.2) and I.A. No.2185/2014 (u/s 151 CPC, by plaintiff) 1. By this order, I propose to decide the above said four applications filed by the parties.2. The plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of possession in respect of the tenanted portion of property bearing No.46...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Kumar Chandwani Vs. Hari Om Sharma
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:8. h August, 2014 + W.P.(C) 6412/2013 RAMESH KUMAR CHANDWANI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Ajay Kumar Chopra, Advocate with Petitioner in person. Versus HARI OM SHARMA ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Tripathi, Advocate with Respondent in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) W.P.(C) 6412/2013 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the award dated 18.12.2010 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court IX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in I.D. No.224/09, titled as Hari Om Sharma Vs. G.R. Sons (Proprietor Ramesh Kumar).2. Vide order dated 08.10.2013, this Court stayed the impugned order.3. Mr.Ajay Kumar Chopra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the respondent joined service with the petitioner in the year 2006. In 2008, establishment of the petitioner was shifted from Wazirpur Industrial Area to Bawana Industria...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Ram Abhilakh Vs. Sh. Ram Phal Tyagi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.Rev No.263/2014 & CM No.12798/2014 (stay) % 8th August , 2014 SH. RAM ABHILAKH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Narang, Advocate. versus SH. RAM PHAL TYAGI ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 6.5.2014, by which the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant has been dismissed and eviction has been ordered from the tenanted premises comprising of one room admeasuring 10X9 ft. being used as godown and one shop admeasuring 9X3ft. in front in the property bearing No.WZ-80, Basai Darapur, New Delhi-15 as shown in red colour in the site plan attached with eviction petition .2. Respondent/landlord filed the eviction petition on the ground that his family besides himself consist...
Tag this Judgment!Narender @ Lala Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 94 of 2010 SEETAL ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CRL.A. 661 of 2009 NARENDER @ LALA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CRL.A. 717 of 2009 VEERPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma and Mr. Amit Kala, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. WITH CRL.A. 916 of 2009 NETRAPAL @ VINOD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0808.2014 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 25 th March 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) convicting the Appellants for the offences under Sections 395/397 of IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and the order on se...
Tag this Judgment!National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S. Sricon Infrastructure Pv ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NE W DELHI Order Reserved on:17. 04.2014 Order Pronounced on:08. 08.2014 OMP6322009 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA PETITIONER Through: Mr. Saurabh S. Sinha and Mr. Arijit Mazumdar, Advocates. versus M/ S . SRICON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT . L TD...... RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajul Srivastav, Advocates. CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The Petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for setting aside Award dated 03.06.2009 alongwith notice dated 11.06.2004 amending the Award dated 03.06.2009. ===================================================================== 2. The Arbitral Tribunal by the Award dated 03.06.2009 had awarded to the Respondent/Claimant a sum of Rs.1366.23 lakhs alongwith future interest @ 12% from three months from the date of the Award. By notice of making correction dated 11.06....
Tag this Judgment!Tarun Kant Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:8. h August, 2014 + CRL.A. 1037/2013 & Crl. MA83172014 TARUN KANT Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Dinesh Malik and Mr. H.Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. % CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and order on sentence dated 25.10.2012 in Sessions Case No.20/12 in case FIR No.521/10., P.S. Hari Nagar u/s 307/498A IPC whereby the appellant was convicted for offence u/s 307 IPC and was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for four years and fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for five months.2. Police machinery was set in motion on receipt of DD No.6A regarding quarrel at 22/5 Prem Nagar, Double Storey, Janakpuri, New Delhi on which SI Ajay Kumar Gupta along with Constable Sita Ram went to the spot where father of the acc...
Tag this Judgment!Nishant Hannan and ors. Vs. South Delhi Municipal Coporation
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CM(M) No.262/2014 8th August , 2014 NISHANT HANNAN & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Adv. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL COPORATION Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Singh and Mr. Pushpendra Shukla, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The challenge by means of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the impugned order of the trial court dated 10.1.2014 which has dismissed an application filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for filing additional documents.2. The subject suit is a suit for mandatory injunction whereby petitioners/plaintiffs seek mutation of their names in the record of the respondent.3. The subject application for additional documents was filed when the plaintiffs evidence was going on, and the documents whi...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Shiv Kumar Giri Vs. Management of Hotel Siddharth Continental
Court: Delhi
$-19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :8. h AUGUST, 2014 LPA5162014 + SHRI SHIV KUMAR GIRI Through : ....Appellant Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Mr.Anuj Aggarwal and Ms.Aarushi Aggarwal, Advocates. versus MANAGEMENT OF HOTEL SIDDHARTH CONTINENTAL ....Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.12757/2014 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. LPA5162014 1. In this intra Court appeal, the Appellant Shiv Kumar Giri impugns a judgment dated 16.04.2014 in W.P.(C) 4764/1995 delivered by learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the writ petition filed to set aside the award dated 07.04.1995 in I.D.No.198/87 whereby the Labour Court answered the reference made by the appropriate Government by holding that the Appellant was not entitled to any relief was dismissed.2. Shorn of details, the facts of the case are t...
Tag this Judgment!Swaranjeet Kaur Sachdeva Vs. Satish Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
$~14. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1820/2011 % Judgment dated 08.08.2014 SWARANJEET KAUR SACHDEVA ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.D.D. Singh and Mr.Navdeep Singh, Advs. versus SATISH CHAUDHARY ..... Defendant Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs.64,00,000/-.2. Summons were issued initially in the prescribed form under the provisions of Order XXXVII. Thereafter as steps were not taken the suit was converted into an ordinary suit.3. Since the defendant could not be served in the ordinary way, the plaintiff filed I.A.19300/2012 for service of summons on the defendant through publication. Notice was published in two newspapers Rashtriya Sahara and The Statesman. Despite service defendant has chosen not to enter appearance and contest this matter. Memo of appearance has also not been filed. Defendant was proceeded ex parte on 30.4.2014. Plaintiff has filed his affidavit by way of ev...
Tag this Judgment!