Delhi Court August 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 15 of about 306 results (0.022 seconds)Globus Infocom Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-iv
Court: Delhi
$~4. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.447/2013 Date of decision:13. h August, 2014 GLOBUS INFOCOM LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. S. Krishnan, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-IV ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Counsel for the respondent-Revenue has not been able to ascertain the correctness of the documents filed along with the present appeal. We are not inclined to grant any further time to the counsel for the respondentRevenue as notice in the appeal was issued on 28th October, 2013 and sufficient time has been granted. Further, a very limited issue arises for consideration.2. By order dated 28th July, 2014, the following substantial question of law was framed:Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in sustaining the order dated 29.2.2012 of the Com...
Tag this Judgment!N Gopalaswami and ors Vs. the Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 08.2014 WP(C) 4653/2013 N GOPALASWAMI & ORS ... Petitioners versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent No.2 : Mr Shanti Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr Prashant Bhushan and Mr Pranav Sachdeva : Mr G. E. Vahanvati, AG with Mr Paras Kuhad and Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Jatan Singh, Mr Sumeet Pushkarna, Gaurav Sharma, Mr Soayib Qureshi, Mr Kartikey Mahajan, Mr Devdutt Kamat, Mr Anoopam Prasad, Ms Tara Narula, Mr Nizam Pasha and Ms Sania Husaini : Mr Amit Sibal with Mr Amrinder Singh AND + WP(C) 4619/2013 MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE ... Petitioner versus THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PRIME MINISTER OFFICE AND OTHERS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Petitioner-in-person with Ms Suman For the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr Paras Kuhad and Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASGs with Mr Jatan Singh, Mr Sume...
Tag this Judgment!Rosa Power Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h August, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.3821/2014 ROSA POWER SUPPLY CO. LTD. .. Petitioner Through: Mr. Sujit Ghosh with Mr. Nakul Mohta & Mr. Sashank, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mrs. Kiran Jai, CGSC & Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. for R-1 to 5. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed in or about the second half of May, 2014, impugns the four orders, all dated 21st March, 2011 of the respondent no.3 Zonal Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, intimating to the petitioner the decision taken in the meeting of the Policy Interpretation Committee held on 15th March, 2011 under the Chairmanship of the Director General of Foreign Trade, of denying Deemed Export Benefits (DEB) if the Bill of Entry is in the name of the project authority as was in the case of the petitioner and accordingly den...
Tag this Judgment!Darshna Vs. State of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:12th August, 2014 + W.P.(C) 5103/2013 DARSHNA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Hemant Gupta, Advocate. Versus STATE OF DELHI AND ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Sangeeta Sondhi, Mr.Ajay Sondhi and Mr.Sanjeev Narula, Advocates. Mr.Ravinder Narwal, Advocate for Intervener. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) W.P.(C) 5103/2013 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking directions against the respondents not to demolish and take forcible possession of any part of the property/land, measuring 3 Bighas 60 Biswas out of Khasra Nos.10/10 (2-10), 10/11/3(o-3) and 10/12/1 (o-13), situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Mohammadpur Mazri, Delhi, which was purchased from Sh. Satbir Singh after obtaining NOC from the office of the Deputy Commissioner concerned.2. Being aggrieved, petitioner made a representation on 10.08.2003 to the BDO (North-West), Kanjhawala, Delhi.3. Since in...
Tag this Judgment!Gursharan Kaur Vs. Trilok Singh
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CM(M) No.745/2014 12th August , 2014 GURSHARAN KAUR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. R.K.Kashyap, Advocate. VERSUS TRILOK SINGH ...... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the landlord impugning the concurrent judgments of the Additional Rent Controller and the Additional Rent Control Tribunal, dated 5.6.2013 and 29.4.2014 respectively, by which the eviction petition of the petitioner/landlord under Section 14(1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short DRC Act) has been dismissed. Eviction petition under Section 14(1)(a) of the DRC Act is filed when there is default in payment of rent in spite of service of a legal notice.2. A reading of the impugned judgments shows that there were two aspects which were urged before the courts below, one aspect with respect to whether r...
Tag this Judgment!Giriraj Prashad Meena Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Etc.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: August 12 , 2014 + CRL.A. 532/2010 GIRIRAJ PRASHAD MEENA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ashok Drall, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ETC. .... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with Insp. Vijay Pal SI Ajay Kumar PS Dabri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Giriraj Prasad Meena aggrieved by the acquittal of Ram Dayal Meena, his son-in-law, for offences under Section 498A/ 304B IPC prefers the present appeal against impugned judgment dated January 06, 2010.2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that there is no dispute to the ingredients of offence under Section 304B that the deceased was married to respondent No.2 and died an unnatural death within 7 years of the marriage. The prosecution through the evidence of the father, mother, brother and sisters-in-law of the deceased has proved beyond reasonable doubt the continuous course of ...
Tag this Judgment!Bubay @ Maya Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : July 07, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : August 12, 2014 + CRL.A. 1172/2012 BUBAY @ MAYA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sidharth Agarwal Advocate with Mr.Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Roshan Lal, PS Nangloi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Bubay @ Maya is a transgender. She was living with Ramu as his wife in a room at No.RZ-C-213, Ambika Enclave, Nihal Vihar, Nangloi, Delhi. Ramu was earning his livelihood by plying a cycle rickshaw. On February 22, 2008 he died due to haemorrhagic shock occasioned by excessive bleeding. The place where he received the injury was the room in which he resided with Maya. The injury was caused with the knife Ex.P-5. Maya was present in the room when Ramu was stabbed.2. Post mortem report of the dead body of Ramu was conducted on February 23, 2008 by Dr.Man...
Tag this Judgment!Samarth Shiksha Samiti Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h August, 2014. % + LPA No.297/2014 & CMs No.6427/2014 (delay in filing) and 6429/2014 (delay in refiling) SAMARTH SHIKSHA SAMITI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Shambhu Nath Singh, Advocate. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Garg, Adv for R-1 to 3. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for GNCT Delhi for R-4/Gao Sabha. Mr. Yogesh Saini for Mr. V.K. Tandon, for R-5/DOE. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra court appeal impugns the order dated 2nd September, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of WP(C) 5497/2013 preferred by the appellant. The appeal is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay of 159 days delay in filing and of 8 days delay in refiling thereof.2. Notice only of the application for condonation of delay was issued. We have heard the counsels, besides on the aspect of delay,...
Tag this Judgment!Surender Singh Dalal Vs. M/S Mother Dairy
Court: Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:12th August, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2855/2014 SURENDER SINGH DALAL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Rakesh Mudgal and Mr. Dinesh Mudgal, Advs. versus M/S MOTHER DAIRY ..... Respondent Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has assailed the award dated 11.07.2011, whereby the termination of the petitioner has been held valid and legal.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the under Section 47 of persons with Disability (Equal Opportunities, protection or rights and full participation) Act, 1995, it is mandatory that whenever a workman suffered from disability, he should be provided with work, which he is competent to do. Since the Management has not granted his legal right, its settlement with the Petitioner is bad in law. Consequently, the termination order dated 15.06.1995 has no bearing.3. It is admitted fact that the Demand Notice...
Tag this Judgment!The Commissioner of Income Tax Ii Vs. Kuldeep Singh
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No.117/2014 Reserved on:18. h July, 2014 Date of Decision:12. h August, 2014 % The Commissioner of Income Tax II ....Appellant Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. Versus Kuldeep Singh Through Respondent None CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi II, in this appeal which pertains to assessment year 2006-07 submits that the assessee, an individual has been wrongly granted benefit of Section 54 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short). The respondent assessee contrary to the statutory mandate, it is submitted had not purchased the second property within two years from the date of sale of the first property. The secondary issue raised pertains to whether Rs.5,00,000/- paid for cancellation of the earlier agreement for sale of the original property and Rs.2,50,000/- paid as brokerage, could be allowed to set off ...
Tag this Judgment!