Delhi Court August 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 13 of about 306 results (0.018 seconds)Spread Info Tech Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zte Kangxun Telecom Co. Ind ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: August 14, 2014 I.A. No.3613/2012 in CS(OS) No.1184/2007 SPREAD INFO TECH CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Gaurav Mitra, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Chadha, Ms.Reha Mitra & Ms.Samreen, Advs. versus ZTE KANGXUN TELECOM CO. INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. .... Defendants Through Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Adv. with Mr.Bishwajit Dubey & Ms.Gargi Jha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery against the defendant on the basis of a cooperation agreement dated 12th August, 2004 executed on 14th August, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as the said agreement) between the parties as the fee for the co-operation services being rendered by the plaintiff to the defendants in view of said agreement.2. The written statement was filed by the defendants on 18th January, 2008. The admission/denial was completed on 27th September, 2010. Issues are not framed for last about four ye...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Kumar Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 11 , 2014 Judgment Delivered on: August 14 , 2014 % + CRL.A. 278/2012 Mukesh Kumar Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocate. versus State NCT of Delhi Represented by: .... Respondent Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Mahesh Kasana, ATO/Sangam Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The present case reveals the tale of an unfortunate father who married his two daughters to two brothers and lost both of them. He could file complaint only for death of Lalita and not the younger daughter Poonam, so as to save the life of Lalita but eventually lost out on that count as well. Mukesh the husband of the deceased Lalita stands convicted for offence punishable under Sections 304B/498A IPC. He has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for offence punishable under Section 304B IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 3 ye...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Caf India Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: August 14, 2014 + I.A. No.10776/2014 in CS(OS) 1678/2014 DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Dinesh Pardasani, Ms.Milanka Chaudhury & Ms.Isha J.Kumar, Advs. versus CAF INDIA PVT LTD & ANR. ..... Defendants Through Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Adv. with Mr.Bishwajit Dubey, Mr.Mohammad Ali Khan, Mr.Aman Avinav & Mr.Shantanu Tyagi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This is a suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by the plaintiff against the defendants seeking declaration that the arbitration agreement under the contract between plaintiff and defendant No.1 is illegal, null and void and unenforceable; the commencement of the arbitration proceedings by the defendants at London before ICC is null, void and of no legal consequence; and a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from pursuing the arbitration proceedings at ICC...
Tag this Judgment!Mr. David Kenneth Hambly and anr. Vs. Mr. Pinto Kumar
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:01. 08.2014 Pronounced on:14. 08.2014 + MAT. APPL.(F.C.) 57/2013, C.M. NOS. 17958/2013 & 17959/2013 MR. DAVID KENNETH HAMBLY AND ANR...... Appellants Through : Sh. Robin. R. David with Sh. P.K. Singh and Sh. Febin Mathew, Advocates. Versus MR. PINTO KUMAR ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Sh. Sanjeev Narula, Sh. Ajay Sondhi and Ms. Shagun, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT C.M. No.17958/2013 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons mentioned in the applicaton, C.M. Appl.17958/2013 is allowed. C.M. No.17959/2013 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. MAT. APPL.(F.C.) 57/2013 1. The Appellants question the judgment and order of the Family Court, Saket in an application (GP No.6 of 2013) under Sections 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (hereafter "the MAT. APPL.(F.C.) 57/2013 Page 1 Guardianship Act") dated 05.07.2013, ...
Tag this Judgment!Santoshanand Avdoot @ Ghanshyam Prashad and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :7. h NOVEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :14. h AUGUST, 2014 + CRL.A. 443/1976 SANTOSHANAND AVDOOT @ GHANSHYAM PRASHAD & ANR. ..... Appellants Through : Ms.Sima Gulati, Advocate with Ms.Shikha Pandey, Advocate for A1. Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Radhe Shyam Sharma and Mr.Ranjan Sharma, Advocates for A3. VERSUS STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Narender Mann, Spl.P.P. with Mr.Manoj Pant, Advocate. Insp. Yasir Arafat. AND + CRL.A. 436/1976 RANJAN DWIVEDI @ RAMJANAM DWIVEDI .... Appellant Through : A-2 in person. VERSUS STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Narender Mann, Spl.P.P. with Mr.Manoj Pant, Advocate. Insp. Yasir Arafat. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The appellants Santoshanand Avadhoot @ Ghan Shyam 1. Prasad (A-1); Ram Janam Dwivedi @ Ranjan Dwivedi (A-2) and Sudevanand Avadhoot @ Misri Lal Yadav (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 28.10.1976 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.9/1976 arising out of ...
Tag this Judgment!U.P. Petroleum Traders Association Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h August, 2014 % + LPA No.405/2014 U.P. PETROLEUM TRADERS ASSOCIATION Through: Mr. A. Maitri, Adv. .. Appellant Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla with Mr. Jasmeet Singh & Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advs. for UOI. Mr. M.M. Kalra, Adv. for IOCL. Mr. Anuj Puri, Adv. for HPCL. AND + LPA No.406/2014 ALL HARYANA PETROLEUM DEALERS ASSOCIATION Through: Mr. A. Maitri, Adv. .. Appellant Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr. M.M. Kalra, Adv. for IOCL. Mr. Anuj Puri, Adv. for HPCL. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These intra-court appeals impugn the identical but separate orders, both dated 16th April, 2014 of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.2021/2014 and W.P.(C) No.1976/2014 preferred by the appellants respectively. Both the appellants claim to be an association of petroleum traders of the...
Tag this Judgment!Suresh @ Mucchad Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : August 12, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : August 14, 2014 + CRL.A. 1326/2012 & Crl.M.A.No.8563/2014 SURESH @ MUCCHAD Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Anita Abraham, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with SI Ajay Singh P.S.Darya Ganj CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Suresh @ Muchhad has been held guilty for having murdered Ram Babu in the late evening of April 15, 2011 at a Tikona park (Triangular Park) adjoining Sulabh Shochalaya near gate No.3 of Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Hospital. The learned Trial Judge has believed Mohd. Izhar PW-1 and Mohd.Alam PW-3 as truthful eye witnesses. The knife Ex.P-1 opined by Dr.Kulbhushan PW-11 who conducted the post mortem on the dead body of Ram Babu as the one from which injuries could be caused to the deceased, which knife was recovered from the personal search ...
Tag this Judgment!Armed Forces Tribunal (Pb) Bar Association and anr Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h August, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 2495/2013 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL (PB) BAR ASSOCIATION AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. V.S. Tomar, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.P. Singh with Mr. Rajiv Aneja, Advocates for UOI. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The challenge in this petition filed in public interest is to:(a) Rule 7 of the Armed Forces Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2008 prescribing a fee of Rs.250/- for every application to be filed before the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT); (b) Rule 11(5) of the Rules aforesaid prescribing a fee of Rs.50/- for service of each of the respondents in excess of five respondents or for execution of processes in respect of an application; (c) Rule 56 of the Armed Forces Tribunal (Practice) Rules, 2009 prescribing a fee of Rs.25/- for inspection of records of a decided case, by a party to a case or his...
Tag this Judgment!All Haryana Petroleum Dealers Association Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h August, 2014 % + LPA No.405/2014 U.P. PETROLEUM TRADERS ASSOCIATION Through: Mr. A. Maitri, Adv. .. Appellant Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla with Mr. Jasmeet Singh & Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advs. for UOI. Mr. M.M. Kalra, Adv. for IOCL. Mr. Anuj Puri, Adv. for HPCL. AND + LPA No.406/2014 ALL HARYANA PETROLEUM DEALERS ASSOCIATION Through: Mr. A. Maitri, Adv. .. Appellant Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr. M.M. Kalra, Adv. for IOCL. Mr. Anuj Puri, Adv. for HPCL. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These intra-court appeals impugn the identical but separate orders, both dated 16th April, 2014 of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.2021/2014 and W.P.(C) No.1976/2014 preferred by the appellants respectively. Both the appellants claim to be an association of petroleum traders of the...
Tag this Judgment!Aftab Ahmed Vs. Lt. Governor-cum-administrator and ors.
Court: Delhi
R~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:14. h August, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 417/2013 AFTAB AHMED ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sameer Jain, Mr. Sandeep Bajaj and Mr. Siddharth Jain, Advocates. Versus LT. GOVERNOR-CUM-ADMINISTRATOR & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey and Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advs. for DDA. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of the impugned letter dated 04.12.2012 whereby the application of the petitioner for allotment of an alternative plot has been rejected which reads as under:The matter was placed before the plot recommendation committee vide minutes dated 09.11.12 after due consideration has rejected the case on the ground that the application for allotment of alternative plot was filed by Sh. Aftab Ahmed on 17.11.88 on the basis of the acquired land which gifted early to him by one Sh. Mohd. Smileth in 1970. Notifi...
Tag this Judgment!