Delhi Court August 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 21 of about 306 results (0.039 seconds)Rakesh Kumar Giri Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. 08.2014 + WP (C) No.4965 of 2014 & CM No.9934 of 2014 (Stay) RAKESH KUMAR GIRI Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. Arun Srivastava, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. In this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus for setting aside the notification dated 10.9.2002 whereby the respondent/Union of India has exempted the application of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (for short the Act) to the Border Security Force. He also seeks quashing of the order dated 11.7.2014, 1.8.2014 issued by the respondents and a further direction that he be kept in service till the age of superannuation. The petitioners case is that he joined the BSF on ...
Tag this Judgment!Bennett, Coleman and Company Ltd. Vs. Real Video Impact Pvt. Ltd. and ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: August 8, 2014 + CS (OS) 1701/2014 BENNETT, COLEMAN & COMPANY LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Ms. Pratibha M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Kunal Tandon, Ms. Nidhi Jain versus REAL VIDEO IMPACT PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ...Defendants Through Mr. Romy Chacko CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. By way of the present suit the plaintiffs seek permanent injunction alongwith other consequential reliefs against the defendants in respect of the mark Now. It is stated that the defendants are unauthorizedly, illegally, dishonestly and with malafide intent using and diluting the mark Now in respect of their television channel known as TV NOW, which is deceptively similar of the Plaintiffs TIMES NOW thereby showing that it is associated with the plaintiff.2. The Plaintiff, popularly known as the Times Group Company, primarily runs the print media since 1838 and became the flagship company of the Times group. The Times Gr...
Tag this Judgment!a R Banerjee Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. M.C. No.3742/2013 Reserved on:23. d July, 2014 Date of Decision:8. h August, 2014 % A R BANERJEE Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Rebeca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harsh Bara & Mr. Nikhil Ahuja, Advs. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Parveen Bhati, APP for the State. Mr. Vivek Sood, Mr. Ajit Nair, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) the petitioner assails the order dated 19.8.2013 passed by learned SCJ-Cum-RC, New Delhi in complaint case No.5536/1/09/12 titled as Anil Dogra vs. A.R. Banerjee for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short the Act), whereby the application moved on behalf of the petitioner seeking opinion of GEQD in relation to hand writing of the body of the cheques in question was dismissed.2. In short, the facts of the present ...
Tag this Judgment!Suresh Kumar Anand Vs. Smt. Suman Bala
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC REV No.225/2013 & C.M. No.9870/2013 (stay) 8th August, 2014 % SURESH KUMAR ANAND Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Suresh Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS SMT. SUMAN BALA Through: ...... Respondent Mr. V.P. Katiyar, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 26.2.2013 by which the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant has been dismissed and the eviction decree in the bonafide necessity petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act has been passed with respect to the tenanted shop bearing private no.4 in property bearing no.2523/193, Tri Nagar, Delhi-110035.2. The subject eviction petition for bonafide necessity was filed inasmuch as the respondent/landlady stated that she...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak Handa Vs. C.B.i.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.265 of 2008 Reserved on:21. t July 2014 Decision on:8. h August 2014 RAJEEV KUMAR GOYAL @ RAJ KUMAR GOYAL.... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Kohli, Advocate. versus STATE THROUGH C.B.I Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, Special Public Prosecutor WITH CRL.A. No.266 of 2008 L.K.GUPTA Through: versus STATE THROUGH C.B.I. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mohit Mathur, Mr. Shahrukh Hussain, Mr. Badar Mehmood, Mr. Varun Tankha and Mr. Devendra Dedha, Advocates. ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, Spl. PP WITH CRL.A. No.269 of 2008 DEEPAK HANDA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Advocates. versus C.B.I. CRL.A. Nos. 265-66,269-70 of 2008 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 40 Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Special Public Prosecutor. AND CRL.A. No.270 of 2008 SANJAY RAINA Through: .... Appellant Mr. Harsh Vardhan Sharma with Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocates. versus C.B.I. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, Special Public Prosecu...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Kumar and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3476/2014 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Rekha Bisht, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondents Ms.Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. SI Man Mohan, P.S. Dabri Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A.No.12055/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.3476/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.380/2013 dated 12.07.2013 registered under Section 498-A/34 IPC Police Station Dabri, as well as all proceedings emanating therefrom, since the parties have amicably settled their disputes.2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice. The second respondent, Geeta, is present in person.4. The Investigating Officer, SI Man Mohan Yadav, Police Station Dabri, identifies the complainant.5. The af...
Tag this Judgment!Nanak Chand Vs. Ram Kishan and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: August 08 , 2014 + CRL.A. 421/2014 NANAK CHAND Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.N.Jha, Adv. versus RAM KISHAN & ORS Represented by: .... Respondents Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for State Mr.Sumit Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-1&2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this appeal under the proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. the appellant/complainant of FIR No.53/2008 under Sections 363/364/34 IPC registered at PS Mangol Puri challenges the order dated February 05, 2014 acquitting the respondents of the charges framed against them.2. Nanak Chand assails the judgment on the ground that the learned Trial Court erroneously acquitted the respondents failing to appreciate that Nanak Chand was under the fear of his life and property at the hands of accused receiving threatening calls and thus he did not lodge any complaint immediately after the kidnapping. The learned Trial Cour...
Tag this Judgment!Rajeev Kumar Goyal @ Raj Kumar Goyal Vs. State Through C.B.i.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.265 of 2008 Reserved on:21. t July 2014 Decision on:8. h August 2014 RAJEEV KUMAR GOYAL @ RAJ KUMAR GOYAL.... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Kohli, Advocate. versus STATE THROUGH C.B.I Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, Special Public Prosecutor WITH CRL.A. No.266 of 2008 L.K.GUPTA Through: versus STATE THROUGH C.B.I. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mohit Mathur, Mr. Shahrukh Hussain, Mr. Badar Mehmood, Mr. Varun Tankha and Mr. Devendra Dedha, Advocates. ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, Spl. PP WITH CRL.A. No.269 of 2008 DEEPAK HANDA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Advocates. versus C.B.I. CRL.A. Nos. 265-66,269-70 of 2008 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 40 Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Special Public Prosecutor. AND CRL.A. No.270 of 2008 SANJAY RAINA Through: .... Appellant Mr. Harsh Vardhan Sharma with Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocates. versus C.B.I. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, Special Public Prosecu...
Tag this Judgment!Veerpal Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 94 of 2010 SEETAL ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CRL.A. 661 of 2009 NARENDER @ LALA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CRL.A. 717 of 2009 VEERPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma and Mr. Amit Kala, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. WITH CRL.A. 916 of 2009 NETRAPAL @ VINOD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0808.2014 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 25 th March 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) convicting the Appellants for the offences under Sections 395/397 of IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and the order on se...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Raina Vs. C.B.i.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.265 of 2008 Reserved on:21. t July 2014 Decision on:8. h August 2014 RAJEEV KUMAR GOYAL @ RAJ KUMAR GOYAL.... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Kohli, Advocate. versus STATE THROUGH C.B.I Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, Special Public Prosecutor WITH CRL.A. No.266 of 2008 L.K.GUPTA Through: versus STATE THROUGH C.B.I. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mohit Mathur, Mr. Shahrukh Hussain, Mr. Badar Mehmood, Mr. Varun Tankha and Mr. Devendra Dedha, Advocates. ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, Spl. PP WITH CRL.A. No.269 of 2008 DEEPAK HANDA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Advocates. versus C.B.I. CRL.A. Nos. 265-66,269-70 of 2008 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 40 Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Special Public Prosecutor. AND CRL.A. No.270 of 2008 SANJAY RAINA Through: .... Appellant Mr. Harsh Vardhan Sharma with Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocates. versus C.B.I. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, Special Public Prosecu...
Tag this Judgment!