Delhi Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pappu Singh @ Raju Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: August 01, 2014 + CRL.A. 1189/2013 PAPPU SINGH @ RAJU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.R.S.Mishra, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP W/SI Saroj Bala, PS Chhawla CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.No.369/2014 Learned counsel for the appellant states that if the appeal could be heard today itself, the application seeking suspension of sentence pending hearing of the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. Crl.M.B.No.369/2014 is accordingly dismissed. Crl.A.No.1189/2013 1. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and having perused the record, the only argument worthy of being noted is that according to the appellant the sentence to undergo imprisonment for life is harsh.2. Before dealing with the issue of sentence we note that appellant was charged for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC....
Noor Jahan Alias Haseena and ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t August, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE No.5/2010 STATE Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Swati Goswami, Adv. for Mr.Dayan Krishnan, ASC with Inspector Rajveer Singh, PS S.P. Badli Versus JAGTAR & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Adv. with Adit S. Pujari, Adv. & Mr.Rahul Kumar, Adv. Crl.A. No.979/2008 AMAR BHADUR THAPAS S/O GYAN BHADUR THAPA .... Petitioner Through Mr.Sumer K. Sethi, Adv. Versus STATE Through ..... Respondents Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP S.I. Amit Rathee, PS Model Town. WITH Death Sentence Ref.No.5/2010, Crl.A.Nos.979/2008, 1087/2010 & 1301/2010 1 + Crl.A. No.1087/2010 RAVINDER ..... Petitioner Mr.Sumer K. Sethi, Adv. Through Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP AND + Crl.A. No.1301/2010 NOOR JAHAN ALIAS HASEENA & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vivek Sood & Mr.Vishwanath Pratap Singh, Advs. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through ...
Mohd. Bilal and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: August 01, 2014 + CRL.A. 243/2013 MOHD. BILAL & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate with Ms.Namita Wali, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Sube Singh Rao, ATO, PS Sagarpur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.No.785/2014 Since the appeal is being heard today on merits, instant application which seeks suspension of sentence pending hearing of the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Crl.A.No.243/2013 1. If the warm hands of a Judge presiding over a sessions trial turn cold, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees that no person shall be deprived of his personal liberty except according to procedure established by law becomes the first casualty.2. A case of no evidence against appellant No.2, Ms.Beena Stella Rafi, has ended in her being convicted for the offence...
Vineet Suri Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.27/2007 Reserved on:15. 05.2014 Date of decision:01. 08.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: VINEET SURI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Suman Kapoor, Advocate with Ms. Isha Shah and Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocates with appellant in person. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The appellant has assailed the judgment dated 23.12.2006 and the order on sentence dated 02.01.2007 passed by the learned ASJ in SC No.38/2006, holding him guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, while acquitting him of the offences under Sections 302 & 304B read with Section 34 IPC. sentence, the appellant has been By the impugned order on sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and pay a fine of `5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 498A IPC and to undergo rig...
Ravinder Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t August, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE No.5/2010 STATE Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Swati Goswami, Adv. for Mr.Dayan Krishnan, ASC with Inspector Rajveer Singh, PS S.P. Badli Versus JAGTAR & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Adv. with Adit S. Pujari, Adv. & Mr.Rahul Kumar, Adv. Crl.A. No.979/2008 AMAR BHADUR THAPAS S/O GYAN BHADUR THAPA .... Petitioner Through Mr.Sumer K. Sethi, Adv. Versus STATE Through ..... Respondents Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP S.I. Amit Rathee, PS Model Town. WITH Death Sentence Ref.No.5/2010, Crl.A.Nos.979/2008, 1087/2010 & 1301/2010 1 + Crl.A. No.1087/2010 RAVINDER ..... Petitioner Mr.Sumer K. Sethi, Adv. Through Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP AND + Crl.A. No.1301/2010 NOOR JAHAN ALIAS HASEENA & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vivek Sood & Mr.Vishwanath Pratap Singh, Advs. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through ...
Amit Electronics (Through Its Proprietor- Mr. Mula Vs. Commissioner of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 08.2014 CUSTOM A. 1/2014 AMIT ELECTRONICS (THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR- MR. MULAKH RAJ DUA) ... Appellant versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Priyadarshi Manish : Mr Kamal Nijhawan CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and it is directed against the final order dated 21.03.2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in Customs Appeal No.59662/2013.2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at the stage of admission itself and the learned counsel are agreed that the appeal may be disposed of at the threshold on the basis of the material available which includes the ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›