Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 36 of about 371 results (0.027 seconds)S. Harvinder Singh Chadha Vs. S.Ujagar Singh Chadha and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t July, 2014. % + FAO(OS) 416/2013, CMs. No.14405-06/2013 & 14408/2013 HARVINDER SINGH CHADHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra and Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocates. Versus SARAN KAUR CHADHA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Vikram, Mr. Chetan Lokur, Mr. Vikram Pradeep and Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, Advocates for R-1 to 3. Mr. Virender Mehta, Advocate for R-4. AND + FAO(OS) 252/2014 HARVINDER SINGH CHADHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra and Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocates. Versus SARAN KAUR CHADHA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Vikram, Mr. Chetan Lokur, Mr. Vikram Pradeep and Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, Advocates for R-1 to 3. Mr. Virender Mehta, Advocate for R-4. AND + CS(OS) 1333/2002, IAs No.2052/2004 & 16382/2013 S. HARVINDER SINGH CHADHA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra and Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocates. Versus S. UJAGAR SINGH CHADHA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Vikra...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Crompton Greaves Ltd Vs. M/S Kusha Appliances and Another
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NE W DELHI Judgment Reserved on: Judgment Pronounced on:21. t April, 2014 01 st July, 2014 CS(OS) 1218/2007 M/ S CROMPTON GREAVES L TD . Through: .....PLAINTIFF Mr. Sushant Singh, Advocate Versus M/ S KUSHA APPLIANCES & ANOTHER Through: Nemo .....DEFENDANTS CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction against the Defendants for restraining the Defendants from infringing the trademark, copyright and for passing off, of the goods of the Defendant as that of the Plaintiffs.2. The Plaintiff contends that the predecessor of the Plaintiff was founded in 1878 and consequent to subsequent mergers etc. in 1937, the present company was established in Bombay and subsequently the name of the company was changed to the present form.3. The Plaintiff is engaged in designing, manufacturing and marketing high-technology electrical products and services related generation, to electrical...
Tag this Judgment!Goyal Mg Gases Private Ltd. Vs. Messer Griesheim Gmbh
Court: Delhi
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : May 05, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : July 01, 2014 + EFA (OS) 3/2014 GOYAL MG GASES PRIVATE LTD. .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Tarun and Mr.Siran Mehta, Advocates versus MESSER GRIESHEIM GMBH .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Mohna M.Lal, Ms.Geetali Talukdar and Mr.Tahir Ashraf Siddiqui, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Vide impugned order dated November 29, 2013 the learned Single Judge has dismissed EA No.32/2007, EA No.152/2008 and EA No.470/2009 filed by the appellant. The learned Single Judge has held : (a) That since the decree sought to be executed is in sum of more than `20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lacs only) the High Court of Delhi has jurisdiction to execute the decree. (b) On merits challenge to the foreign decree on the plea that it violates ...
Tag this Judgment!Sicpa India Private Ltd. Vs. Kapil Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on: July 01, 2014 I.A. No.478/2011, I.A. No.6654/2011, I.A. No.6657/2011, I.A. No.20809/2011, I.A. No.274/2012, I.A. No.15011/2010, I.A. No.15012/2010 and CS(OS) 2277/2010 SICPA INDIA PRIVATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.C.Mukund, Adv. with Mr.Ashok Kumar Jain, Adv. versus KAPIL KUMAR & ORS Through ..... Defendants Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Lakshmi Gurung, Adv. and Mr.Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Adv. for D-1 to D-3. Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vikas Arora, Mr.Manish, Mr.Mohit Taneja, Mr.Varun and Mr.Arpit Maheshwari, Advs. for D6. Mr.T.K.Ganju, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Salil Seth and Mr.Rajarshi Bhuyan, Advs. for proposed D-7. Mr.Arav Kapoor, Adv. for ICICI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide the following application filed by the parties to the suit. The details of the same are mentioned below : Applications filed by plaintiff : i. I.A. No.15011/2010 (Ord...
Tag this Judgment!S. Harvinder Singh Chadha Vs. Saran Kaur Chadha and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t July, 2014. % + FAO(OS) 416/2013, CMs. No.14405-06/2013 & 14408/2013 HARVINDER SINGH CHADHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra and Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocates. Versus SARAN KAUR CHADHA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Vikram, Mr. Chetan Lokur, Mr. Vikram Pradeep and Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, Advocates for R-1 to 3. Mr. Virender Mehta, Advocate for R-4. AND + FAO(OS) 252/2014 HARVINDER SINGH CHADHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra and Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocates. Versus SARAN KAUR CHADHA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Vikram, Mr. Chetan Lokur, Mr. Vikram Pradeep and Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, Advocates for R-1 to 3. Mr. Virender Mehta, Advocate for R-4. AND + CS(OS) 1333/2002, IAs No.2052/2004 & 16382/2013 S. HARVINDER SINGH CHADHA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra and Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocates. Versus S. UJAGAR SINGH CHADHA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Vikra...
Tag this Judgment!Ultimate Services Pvt. Ltd. and anr Vs. Delhi Development Authority an ...
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t July, 2014 % + CS(OS) 1441/2004 & I.A.7527/2013 (of defendant u/O7R-11 CPC) SAMANIT ENTERPRISES & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Advocate. AND + CS(OS) 1442/2004 & I.A.7528/2013 (of defendant u/O7R-11 CPC) ULTIMATE SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Advocate. AND + CS(OS) 818/2006 & I.A.7526/2013 (of defendant u/O7R-11 CPC) SH. HARI RAM AND ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. D.V. Khatri, Adv. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Advocate. AND + CS(OS) 1128/2008 & I.A. No.21037/2011 (for correction in the crossexamination of PW-1) JASBIR SINGH Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Rashi Verma and Ms. Swati Gupta, Advocates. Versus DDA AND ORS T...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Planet Colors Eco Townships Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t July, 2014 % + LPA No.395/2014 M/S PLANET COLORS ECO TOWNSHIPS LTD. .. Appellant Through: Mr. Muneesh Malhotra with Mr. Achin Mittal, Advs. Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .. Respondents Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 19.03.2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.1796/2014 filed by the appellant.2. The said writ petition was filed seeking, (i) appointment of a three member committee to supervise and overview the process of development of the property, of the appellant at Bhiwadi, mortgaged with the consortium of the three respondent banks viz. State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB) & State Bank of Travancore (SBT), with one nominee of the Court, one nominee of the respondent banks and one nominee of the appellant; and, (ii) for deposit of the procee...
Tag this Judgment!Harvinder Singh Chadha Vs. Saran Kaur Chadha and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t July, 2014. % + FAO(OS) 416/2013, CMs. No.14405-06/2013 & 14408/2013 HARVINDER SINGH CHADHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra and Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocates. Versus SARAN KAUR CHADHA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Vikram, Mr. Chetan Lokur, Mr. Vikram Pradeep and Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, Advocates for R-1 to 3. Mr. Virender Mehta, Advocate for R-4. AND + FAO(OS) 252/2014 HARVINDER SINGH CHADHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra and Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocates. Versus SARAN KAUR CHADHA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Vikram, Mr. Chetan Lokur, Mr. Vikram Pradeep and Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, Advocates for R-1 to 3. Mr. Virender Mehta, Advocate for R-4. AND + CS(OS) 1333/2002, IAs No.2052/2004 & 16382/2013 S. HARVINDER SINGH CHADHA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra and Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocates. Versus S. UJAGAR SINGH CHADHA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Vikra...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shree Nath Heritage L ...
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t July, 2014 % + CS(OS) 2589/2013 M/S ALLIED BLENDERS & DISTILLERS PVT. LTD.....Plaintiff Through: Mr. T.R. Andhyarujina and Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Shrawan Chopra & Ms. T. Saukshmya, Advs. Versus SHREE NATH HERITAGE LIQUOR PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sumit Rajput, Ms. Aastha Jain, Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad and Mr. Rajul Jain, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.IA No.20759/2013 (of the plaintiff u/O XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from selling, distributing, advertising or dealing in alcoholic beverages especially Indian made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) or goods of any description bearing the trade mark Collectors Choice or any other mark deceptively similar to the plaintiffs trade mark Officers Choice and amounting to infringement of the plaintiffs registered trade m...
Tag this Judgment!Thiess Minecs India Pvt Ltd Vs. Ntpc Ltd
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:29. 05.2014 Judgment delivered on:01. 07.2014 O.M.P. 630/2014 THIESS MINECS INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. A.M. Singhvi & Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocates along with Ms. Pallavi Shroff, Mr.Dhruv Dewan, Mr. Siddhartha Datta, Mr. Rohan Batra, Ms. Anannya Ghosh & Mr.Aditya Nayyar, Advocates. versus NTPC LTD Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Nandish Vyash, Mr. Anuj Malhotra & Mr.Manpreet Lamba, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) primarily to seek a restraint against the respondent from giving effect to the termination of contract between the parties, in pursuance of the termination letter dated 07.05.2014. The petitioner also seeks other consequential ad interim injunctive reliefs.2. Though no notice has...
Tag this Judgment!