Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Srijan ek Aasha Secrtary Rajesh Dubey, Jabalpur (M.P.) Vs. the State o ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2014
Dalip Singh, Judicial Member: 1. This application came to be registered after the original Writ Petition No. 1851/2013 filed by way of PIL was transferred to this Tribunal by the Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur. 2. After the petition was transferred and registered here as a Original Application No. 02/2014, notices were ordered to be issued. None has appeared on behalf of the Applicant on the previous dates and today also. 3. We have perused the contents of the application. The Applicant has raised the issue in the present application with regard to the construction of a hotel by the Respondent No. 3, M.P. Tourism Development Corporation (in short 'MPTDC') in the Dumna area near Jabalpur city alleging that precious forest land has been diverted for non forest activity in violation of the provisions of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. It is alleged in the petition that the Dumna area belongs to the Jabalpur Municipal Corporation and a Nature Park has been developed ...
Sh. Jagdish Vs. Smt. Monika
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 40/2014 SH. JAGDISH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Anil Kumar Mehta, Advocate. versus SMT. MONIKA ..... Respondent Through: Nemo CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.C.M.No.6056/2014 This is an application filed by the Appellant seeking condonation of 24 days delay in filing the petition. In view of the grounds given in the application, the delay is condoned. Application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 40/2014 1. The Appellant in the present appeal seeks to challenge the judgment of the learned Family Court dismissing the petition filed by the Appellant under section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty.2. The facts as delineated in the petition (Annexure P-4) are that the marriage between the Appellant and the Respondent was solemnized on 8.12.2004 at Village Khandewla, Farr...
Naveen Jindal and anr. Vs. Zee Media Corporation Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S. (OS) No.881/2014 Decided on :1. t April, 2014 Plaintiffs NAVEEN JINDAL & ANR. Through: Mr. A.M. Singhvi, Rajiv Nayar, Mr. T.K. Ganju & Mr. J.P. Sengh, Mr. N.K. Kaul, Senior Advocates with Mr. Sanjiv Kapoor, Mr. Rajat Jariwal, Mr. Sumeet Batra, Ms. Ankita Gupta, Mr. Rajeev Goyal, Mr. Aakash Bajaj & Mr. G.L. Sharma, Advocates. Versus ZEE MEDIA CORPORATION LTD & ORS Through: Defendants Mr. Aman Lekhi & Mrs. Prathiba M. Singh, Senior Advocates with Mr. Tejveer Singh Bhatia, Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee & Mr. Varun Kumar Tikmani, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.5690/2014 1. This order shall dispose of an application of the plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC for grant of pre-telecasting stay against the defendant in a suit for permanent/mandatory injunction and damages.2. Briefly stated the facts leading to the filing of the present suit are that the plaintiff is a two-time Member of Parliament from the Ku...
Ravinder Ram Chander Banshi Vs. the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
$~R-84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :25.3.2014 Judgment delivered on :01.04.2014 + CRL.A. 251/2006 RAVINDER RAM CHANDER BANSHI Through ..... Appellant Mr.Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Varun Goswami, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 30.4.2005 and 10.5.2055 respectively wherein he has been convicted under Section 304 IPC and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for 6 months. Benefit of Section 428 of the Cr.P.C. has been granted to the appellant. For the offences under Sections 365 and 471 IPC for which he had been charge sheeted he stood acquitted. 2 Nominal roll of the appellant shows that as on the date when he was released on bail he had undergone a sentence for a peri...
Mohd. Shahid Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t April, 2014 + CRL.A.433/1999 MOHD. SHAHID Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Advocate versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP CRL.A.456/1999 MUKHTIYAR AHMED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Arun Srivastava, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Appellant Mohd. Shahid and Mukhtiyar Ahmed have filed separate appeals bearing No.Crl.A.433/1999 and Crl.A.456/1999 challenging the common judgment and order on sentence dated 2nd August, 1999 and 4th August, 1999 respectively passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.124/97 arising out of FIR No.288/97, PS Kamla Market whereby the appellants were convicted under Section 302/34 IPC as well as under Section 27 and 25 of Arms Act and were sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and fine of ...
Shamiullah Sheikh @ Sam @ Jeedar and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : April 01, 2014 + CRL.A.205/2011 SHAMIULLAH SHEIKH @ SAM @ JEEDAR & ANR. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Shakeel Sarwan Wani, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State. Insp.Rajendra Singh, Special Cell. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Shamillah Sheikh @ Sam @ Jeedar (A-1) and Mohd.Sheikh (A-2) impugn a judgment dated 09.11.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge/II/North, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.47/2010 arising out of FIR No.01/07 registered at Police Station Special Cell by which they were convicted under Section 4/5 Explosive Substances Act 1908 read with Section 18 and 23 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1957 and Section 120B IPC. By an order dated 10.11.2011, they were sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine `25,000/- each under Sections 4/5 Explosive Substances Act; RI for ten years with fine `50,000/- each under Section 18/23 of Unlawful Activit...
Shiv Rattan Mohta Vs. National Research Development Corporation and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 04.2014 FAO (OS) 169/2014 SHIV RATTAN MOHTA ... Appellant versus NATIONAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Sudhir Kumar Sharma : None CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal has been preferred from the judgment dated 29.01.2014 delivered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in CS (OS) 1202/2009 and several objections filed by the parties in the form of IAs in respect of an Award dated 28.05.2009.2. The learned Single Judge by virtue of the impugned judgment has remitted the matter in part to the learned Arbitrator in the following manner:15.8 In these circumstances, I am clearly of the view that insofar as award dated 28.05.2009 allows claim/prayer (a), it will have to be sustained. It is ordered accordingly. However, to the ex...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Poonam and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
$~R55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:1. t April, 2014 % + MAC.A.322/2007 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Adv. Versus POONAM AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 03.02.2007, whereby Ld. Tribunal awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.1,84,500/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim Petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the present appeal, appellant is seeking complete exoneration from any liability as the cheque issued by the owner of the offending vehicle got dishonoured and thereafter the insurance policy was cancelled.3. The issue raised in the instant appeal has been dealt by this court in the case bearing MAC.App. No.495/2010, Usha Aggarwal v. Pramod kr. Gupta and ors., decided on 27.11.2013 wherein it is held as under:15....
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Roop Ram and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
$~R58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:1. t April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 334/2007 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. Versus ROOP RAM AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 09.02.2007, whereby Ld. Tribunal awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.60,500/- with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim Petition till realization of the amount.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant had sent a notice under Order XII Rule 8 CPC to respondent No.3 / owner of the offending vehicle for producing the valid driving licence. However, he failed to do so.3. Moreover, police had filed a charge sheet against respondent No.2 / driver of the offending vehicle, despite, the Ld. Tribunal has not granted recovery rights in favou...
Mohd. Sher Nabi Chaman Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TR.P (C)No.47/2013 & CM No.8414/2013 1st April, 2014 % MOHD. SHER NABI CHAMAN Through: ......Petitioner None. VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 24 CPC for consolidation of the three suits as stated below:(A) Suit no.326/2007 (new no.CS-336/2011, M-9/2011, titled as Mohd. Sher Nabi Chaman Vs. DDA (Previously pending in the court of Ms. Anjali Mahajan, Ld. Civil Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi) now transferred to the court of Shri Jagdish Kumar, Ld. ASCJ (East District), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi vide order dated 04.02.202013 passed by this Honble Court in Transfer P.(C) no.2/2013 titled as DDA Vs. Sher Nabi Chaman (fixed for 15.07.2013). (B) Suit No.129/2005 (Renumbered as 297/2007) titled as Mohd. Sher Nabi Chaman Vs. M.S.Sharma & Ors., pending in the...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »