Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 39 of about 432 results (0.026 seconds)Ravi Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Others
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d April, 2014 + W.P.(CRL) 448/2014 RAVI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Lal Bahadur Pandey, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & OTHERS... Respondents Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for the State with Ms. Charu Dalal, Advocate. Insp. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, SHO with SI Deepale Purohit, PS Sultanpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA J.(ORAL) 1. This is a writ of habeas corpus for direction to produce Anand Rao, younger brother of the petitioner, stated to be 17 years of age. Petitioner Ravi, it is stated, is a resident of village Naya Gaon, Post Chahaundaghat, Main Post office Ram Nagar, PS Jahangirganj, District Ambedkar Nagar, U.P. had reached Delhi on 23.12.2013, to trace out and locate his brother Anand Rao.2. In the writ petition it is alleged that on local inquiry the petitioner came to know that on 20.12.2013 at 7:00 p.m. some...
Tag this Judgment!Sonu @ Attey Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :26.03.2014. Judgment delivered on :02. 04.2014 CRL.A. 103/2006 SONU @ ATTEY Through ..... Appellant Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey and Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 17.11.2005 wherein the appellant Sonu @ Attey along with the two other persons namely Sanjeev @ Suar and Kaley have been convicted under Sections 307/324/341/506/34 of the IPC and has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for 6 months for the offence under Section 307/34 of the IPC; for the offence under Sections 324/506/34, he has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 1 year; for the offence under Section 341/34 IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo...
Tag this Judgment!Madhvi JaIn Vs. Bses Yamuna Power Ltd
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.1/2014 2nd April, 2014 % MADHVI JAIN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Praveen Jain, Advocate. Versus BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manish Srivastava, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. There is a very limited issue in this appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The limited issue is that whereas the suit of the appellant/plaintiff for mandatory and permanent injunction was decreed, however the amount deposited by the appellant/plaintiff for enhancement of the sanctioned load from 30 kw to 55 kw amounting to Rs.49,140/- was held to be not recoverable by the appellant/plaintiff as recovery was held to be time barred. Recovery was prayed because the sanctioned load has indubitably not been enhanced.2. The following substantial question of law arises in the present appeal:Whether the suit of the appellant/p...
Tag this Judgment!Ms. Minakshi Arora Vs. Sh. Umesh Kumar Batra
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.114/2013 2nd April, 2014 % MS. MINAKSHI ARORA Through: ..... Appellant Appellant in person. Versus SH. UMESH KUMAR BATRA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. J.K. Chawla, Advocate with Ms. Shisba Chawla, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed against the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 23.5.2012 and the first appellate court dated 1.3.2013; by which the suit of the respondent/plaintiff /landlord has been decreed with respect to entire third floor of the property being House no.147, Partap Nagar, Mayur Vihar-I, Dehi-91.2. The facts of the case are that the appellant/defendant/tenant took a portion on rent of third floor comprising of two bed rooms, one drawing-cum-dining room, one kitchen, one toilet-cum-bathroom at a rent of Rs.9,000/- per mont...
Tag this Judgment!Sahil Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : March 24, 2014 DECIDED ON : April 02, 2014 + CRL.A. 1356/2012 SAHIL Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Anita Abraham, Advocate. Versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Sahil (the appellant) questions the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 01.08.2012 of learned Additional Sessions Judge-FTC (Central) in Sessions Case No.48/10 arising out of FIR No.107/10 registered at Police Station Ranjeet Nagar by which he was convicted under Sections 393/394/398 IPC and 27 Arms Act. By an order on sentence dated 08.08.2012, he was awarded RI for seven years with fine `2,500/- under Section 393 IPC; RI for seven years with fine `2,500/under Section 394 IPC; RI for seven years under Section 398 IPC and RI for three years with fine `1,000/- under Section 27 Arms Act. All the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Allegations against the appellant-Sahil, as revealed in the charge-...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Sh Praveen Kumar Aggarwal and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:2. d April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 390/2013 & CM No.4095/2014 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Shantha Devi Raman and Mr.Sanjeet Ranjan, Advocates. Versus SH PRAVEEN KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.Rampal Singh, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.4095/2014 (U/s 151 CPC) 1. Vide order dated 03.05.2013, on depositing the award amount along with upto date interest, 60% of the same was directed to be released in favour of the respondent/claimant in terms of the award passed by the Ld. Tribunal.2. Accordingly, a cheque was issued in the name of respondent No.1, wherein it is written Praveen Kumar Aggarwal S/o Late Sh. Kishanlal, whereas fathers name of respondent No.1/claimant is Sh.Suraj Bhan.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1/cl...
Tag this Judgment!M D, Panbas Vs. Reshma and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:2. d April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 782/2013 M D, PANBAS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Kamal Sharma, Advocate. Versus RESHMA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.D.K.Sharma, Ms.Vandna Sharma and Mr.Ikram, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Mr. Vikram Singh and Mr.Vinod Kumar, Advocates for Respondent No.7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 29.04.2013, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for an amount of Rs.12,23,296/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of DAR petition till realization of the amount.2. Mr.Kamal Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant submits that the negligence on the part of the respondent No.7, i.e., driver of the offending vehicle has not been established as there was no eye witness to the accident. However, while awarding compensat...
Tag this Judgment!Abdul Rasheed Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: April 02, 2014 + CRL.A.694/1999 ABDUL RASHEED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CRL.A.1/2000 MOHD. YAMEEN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: + CRL.A.4/2000 ABDUL HAMID ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: Crl.A. Nos. 694/1999, 1/2000 & 4/2000 ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J1 The challenge in these appeals is to the impugned judgment dated 24.11.1999 and the order on sentence dated 29.11.1999, passed by the learned Additional ...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Kamlesh and ors
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:2. d April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 1173/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. Versus KAMLESH & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 26.07.2012, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.7,98,800/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim Petition till realization of the amount.2. Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that deceased died at the age of 34 years leaving behind his wife, the only dependent. Accordingly, Ld. Tribunal ought to have deducted towards personal expenses, however, wrongly deducted 1/3 towards the same.3. On the other hand, Mr. Anshuman Bal, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent / cla...
Tag this Judgment!Rahul JaIn @ Sonu Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct), Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :11. h MARCH, 2014 DECIDED ON :2. d APRIL, 2014 + CRL.A. 133/2014 RAHUL JAIN @ SONU Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Alpana Pandey, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT), DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to a judgment dated 09.03.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.1030/09 arising out of FIR No.336/2008 PS Keshav Puram by which the appellant Rahul Jain @ Sonu along with his associates Sanjay Yadav and Rattan @ Mintoo was convicted under Sections 392/397 IPC. By an order on sentence dated 19.03.2011, he was awarded RI for seven years with fine ` 5,000/- under Section 392 IPC read with Section 397 IPC.2. The prosecution case as projected in the charge-sheet was that on 17.12.2008 at about 11.15 P.M. opposite Gali No.125, Shanti Nagar, near Road No.37, Delhi, the appellant along with his associates Sanjay Yadav and R...
Tag this Judgment!