Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nipun Gola @ Nikhil Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Appeal No.7/2014 Reserved on:19. h March, 2014 Date of Decision:3. d April,2014 % NIPUN GOLA @ NIKHIL ....Appellant Through Mr. Ajay Verma with Mr. Prateek Sisodia And Mr. Gaurav Bhattacharya, Advocates. Versus STATE Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. + Crl. Appeal 43/2014 AMIT @ CHUNNU ....Appellant Through Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey with Mr. Shiv Pande and Mr. Nishaank Mattoo, Advocates. Versus STATE Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.Nipun Gola @ Nikhil and Amit @ Chunnu, two appellants impugn their conviction for murder with common intention, of Sunil by Judgment dated 24th September, 2013 in Sessions Case No.91/2011 arising out of FIR No.186/2011. By order of sentence dated 26th September, 2013, two appellants have been sentenced to life imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default thereof they have to undergo rigorou...
Brijesh Kumar Gupta Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:31. 03.2014 Date of Decision:03. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 1242/2010 BRIJESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Ms Nandita Rao, Adv. versus NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ..... Respondent Through: Mr Rajesh Manchanda and Mr Rajat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.On 05.05.2006, in the night intervening 4/5th May, 2006, at about 2.00 AM, Shri Prem Khanduri, Intelligence Officer (IO), NCB, DZU, New Delhi, received a secret information that one Brijesh Kumar Gupta, a resident of Mainpuri, U.P., who was engaged in supplying heroin in Delhi, would come to Mayur Vihar, Akshar Dham Chowk between 03.00 to 4.00 AM, to supply huge quantity of heroin to his customers. Shri Prem Khundari recorded the aforesaid information and forwarded the same to his Superintendent Shri R.R. Kumar, who directed him to take necessary action. Crl. A. No1242/2010 Khanduri collected the seal of NCB, DZU-5 from Shri R.R. Kumar, who was ...
Ravi and anr Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
$~R-13 to 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 859/2010 RAKESH ..... Appellant Through : Counsel for the appellant with appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : + Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 884/2010 UDAI PAL & ORS. ..... Appellant Through : Counsel for the appellant with appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : + Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 899/2010 RAVI & ANR .... Appellants Through : Counsel for the appellant with appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.On 29th October, 2003, on receipt of DD No.27A, SI K.L.Meena of Police Station Malviya Nagar, reached House No.96, Hauz Rani, Malviya Nagar, where the complainant Shamim Ali Khan was present. The statement of the complainant was recorded by the Police Officer. The complainant told him that he had been residing as a tenant in House ...
Gianshree Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h March, 2014 Pronounced on:3. d April, 2014 + CRL. A. 807/2010 GIANSHREE ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. Appellant Gianshree impugns the judgment dated 12.10.2009 and the order on sentence dated 23.10.2009 whereby she along with one Dharambir @ Dharmender @ Kala (subsequently held to be a juvenile and released after his conviction was upheld) was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). For the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1500/- or in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for two months. For the offence punishable under Section 201/34 IPC, the appellant was...
Udai Pal and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
$~R-13 to 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 859/2010 RAKESH ..... Appellant Through : Counsel for the appellant with appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : + Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 884/2010 UDAI PAL & ORS. ..... Appellant Through : Counsel for the appellant with appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : + Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 899/2010 RAVI & ANR .... Appellants Through : Counsel for the appellant with appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.On 29th October, 2003, on receipt of DD No.27A, SI K.L.Meena of Police Station Malviya Nagar, reached House No.96, Hauz Rani, Malviya Nagar, where the complainant Shamim Ali Khan was present. The statement of the complainant was recorded by the Police Officer. The complainant told him that he had been residing as a tenant in House ...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Ms.Roshini Mamgai and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:3. d April, 2014 % + MAC.APP.247/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate. Versus MS.ROSHINI MAMGAI & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 24.11.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for an amount of Rs.15,91,283/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till the notice under Order 21 Rule 1 CPC is issued by the Insurance Company.2. Mr. Sameer Nandwani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company submits that the driver of the offending vehicle was not holding valid driving licence on the date of the accident, and the same has been proved by R3W1, who deposed that he inspected the record from...
Gurdeep Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.517/1999 % Reserved on:24. h January, 2014 Date of Decision:3. d April, 2014 GURDEEP SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J: Appellant-Gurdeep Singh challenges his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) for murder of Baljit Singh and violation of Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, vide judgment dated 15th March, 1999 in Sessions Case No.30/98 arising out of FIR No.946/1997, Police Station Patel Nagar. By order on the point of sentence dated 16th March, 1999, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.500/- under Section 302 IPC. In default of payment of fine, he has to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment. For the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act, he ha...
Vikas @ Johny Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : April 02, 2014 DECIDED ON : April 03 , 2014 + CRL.A. 659/2012 VIKAS @ JOHNY Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Raj Kumari, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Vikas @ Johny has preferred the present appeal against a judgment dated 24.09.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.08/10 arising out of FIR No.67/10 registered at Police Station Vasant Kunj by which he was convicted under Section 307/34 IPC. By an order dated 27.09.2011, he was sentenced to undergo RI for five years with fine `5,000/-.2. The prosecution case, as set up in the charge-sheet, was that on 27.02.2010 in between 08.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m., on the way from DLF mall to Kushum Pahari within the jurisdiction of Police Station, Vasant Kunj, the appellant and his associate Vijay @ Gorkha in furtherance of common intention inflicted injuries by a sharp weapon ...
M/S Baco Metallics Industries Vs. M/S Zeta Leathers Exports and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h March, 2014 Date of Decision:3. d April , 2014 % + CRL. M.C. No.1521/2013 M/S BACO METALLICS INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjeev Mahajan, Adv. versus M/S ZETA LEATHERS EXPORTS & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the petitioner seek quashing of order dated 23.1.2013 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi whereby the complaint filed by the petitioner was returned to the complainant.2. In a nutshell, the facts of the present case are that the petitioner/complainant filed a complaint under Section 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on the grounds, inter alia, that the respondent herein had been purchasing goods from the petitioner. As per books of accounts maintained by the pe...
Mohd. Akhtar Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 04.2014 + CRL. A.197 of 2010 MOHD. AKHTAR Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Inderjeet Sandhu, Adv. versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 20.8.1996, on receipt of copy of DD No.30, ASI Balwan Singh of Police Station Ambedkar Nagar reached Chandrawal Road, A-2 Block, Allah Hoo Ka Dhaba, Madangir, New Delhi where he came to know that the injured had been taken to AIIMS by PCR van. The police officer then reached AIIMS where the injured Aas Mohammad, son of Rashid Mohammad was found admitted in injured condition. He being fit for statement, his statement was recorded by the police officer. The complainant told him that at about 9:15 p.m. that day he along with his friend Bhura had come to meet some persons known to Bhura. When he and Bhura were taking food in a hotel at Chandrawal Road, A-Block, a boy came there, started taking meal...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »