Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 43 of about 432 results (0.022 seconds)Saheb Mehto and ors. Vs. Chaman Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R34-A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:1. t April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 1029-30/2006 SAHEB MEHTO AND ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr. Peeush Sharma, Adv. versus CHAMAN SINGH AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 04.11.2006, whereby, Ld. Tribunal awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.2,87,000/- with interest @ 7% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim Petition till realization of the amount.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that initially the Claim Petition was filed under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. However, on an application being moved by the appellant, Ld. Tribunal vide order dated 16.03.2004 converted the same under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act.3. Ld. Counsel further submits that despite the conversion of the Claim Petition to Section 163-A...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Virender Singh and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO1842012 & CM No.7702/2012 (for stay) % 1st April, 2014 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ......Appellant Through: Mr. D.D.Singh, Adv. VERSUS VIRENDER SINGH & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Yogesh Saini, Adv. for R-1 and 2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed by the insurance company under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Commissioner dated 25.1.2012 by which the Commissioner awarded compensation to the respondent no.1 herein, petitioner before the Commissioner.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent no.1 was working with the respondent no.2 herein as a semi skilled worker engaged for replacing the insulator string cross arm of electric tower at Gangrat (H.P). When the respondent no.1 was engaged in his work on 28.9.2008, the electric tower collap...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Bhajan Lal Vs. Jivan Kishore
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.246/2013 & CM Nos. 17415/2013 & CM No.17416/2013 4th April, 2014 % SH. BHAJAN LAL Through: ......Appellant Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS JIVAN KISHORE ...... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Notice could not be issued to the respondent as process fee was returned under objections. Appellant was duty bound to file process fee and get the notices issued because appellant has been successful in obtaining an interim order of stay of the impugned judgment on 1.11.2013 when notices were issued. I have therefore heard the counsel for the appellant in the appeal.2. This second appeal is filed under Section 100 CPC , 1908 impugning the judgment of the first appellate court dated 22.8.2013. The first appellate court by the impugned judgment has dismissed the appeal of the appellant by which the appellant-defendant challenged the judgment o...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sh. Ravinder Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:1. t April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 330/2007 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. Versus SH. RAVINDER KUMAR AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 12.03.2007, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.81,000/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim Petition till realization of the amount.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that appellant had sent a notice under Order XII Rule 8 CPC to respondent nos. 8 & 9 to produce the driving licence and insurance policy respectively. However, they failed to do so. Accordingly, they were proceeded ex-parte as recorded by the Ld. Tribunal in Para 2 of the award.3. Ld. Counsel further submits that driver of the offending ...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Ramo Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:1. t April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 249/2011 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. Versus RAMO DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 18.01.2011, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.18,24,740/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim Petition till realization of the amount.2. The Tribunal has also awarded an amount of Rs.20,000/- as pleaders fee.3. Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the claimants failed to prove the negligence on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle, despite, the Ld. Tribunal awarded compensation as noted above.4. On the issue of negligence, Tribunal has framed issue No.1 as under:Whether deceased ...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Harish Chander Bhatt and ors
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:1. t April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 1203/2012 & CM.No.19408/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate. Versus HARISH CHANDER BHATT & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pradeep Nawani, Advocate with Respondent No.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. 1203/2012 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 18.08.2012 and the amended order dated 26.09.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.22,97,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Brief facts of the case are that on 05.02.2011 at about 8.42 am, the respondent No.1 was going on his scooter bearing No.DL3X6280 When he reached in front of Central School, Masjid Moth, Sadiq Nagar, a bus bearing No.DL1PA7510, being driven rashly and negligently b...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Ms.Shamim Fatima and ors
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:1. t April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 1227/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate. Versus MS.SHAMIM FATIMA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Satya Narayan, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. 1227/2012 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 18.09.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for an amount of Rs.8,60,016/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company submits that on the date of the accident the deceased was 20 years of age, he was bachelor and left behind his parents. Therefore, the learned Tribunal ought to have deducted one-half of the income of the deceased towards personal expenses instead of one...
Tag this Judgment!M.L. Arya, Ex. Accountant, Dehradun Vs. Union of India Through the Sec ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
V.N. Gaur, Member (A). 1. The present application has been filed by the applicant against the order of respondent no.3 dated 14.05.2009, directing respondent no.4 to treat the period from 26.08.2004 to 26.01.2005 as dies non. 2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the applicant was issued a charge-sheet on 23.08.2006 containing a charge that he remained absent from 26.08.2004 to 26.01.2005 without any sanctioned leave. The charge-sheet contained three more charges with regard to financial irregularities etc. After enquiry the Disciplinary Authority (DA) issued an order on 25.05.2008 imposing a penalty of compulsory retirement from service with effect from 31.05.2008. The applicant preferred an appeal vide his letter dated 21.06.2008, which was considered by the Appellate Authority (AA) and an order was passed on 09.03.2009 setting aside the penalty of compulsory retirement imposed on him by the DA and treating him to be in service till his normal date of superannuation i.e., 31....
Tag this Judgment!N.K. Kolekar Dhanagi Hindu Vs. Uoi and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
1. Heard on MA No.167/2014, which is an application u/s 15 (6)(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 for suspension of sentence and grant of bail. 2. This OA has been preferred against the order dated 30.10.2013 passed by the GCM whereby the applicant was convicted u/s 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (for short POCSO), 2012 read with Section 69 of Army Act, 1950 (on two counts) and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years. However, the confirming authority has reduced the period of custodial sentence to five years. 3. Allegations as found proved against the applicant, in short, are that, he had subjected the prosecutrix, a girl aged about five years, to sexual assault with his hand as well as tongue. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that none of the accusations was made out in view of the following facts: (i) Delay of four days in reporting the matter to the concerned authority; (ii) Inherent lack of jurisdiction of GCM to try the offence und...
Tag this Judgment!Ranjana Jetley and Others Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Environment ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
1. The above applications were filed in NGT against the proposed widening of sectoral roads involving cutting of number of trees in front of National Media Centre (NMC). The Project Proponents stated to be involved in the project are Haryana Development Authority (HUDA) and DLF Ltd. The main contention of the applicants is that there will be significant air and noise pollution problems due to movement of traffic in the area due to cutting of trees which were acting as a buffer and reducing noise and dust pollution. Incidentally, an email was received by NGT from Haryali Welfare Society addressed to the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Haryana and the Copy was sent to NGT raising the similar issues pertaining to the cutting of trees by DLF/HUDA, which was treated as an Application no. 120/2013. Regarding this Application No. 120/2013, NGT passed the order restraining the Respondents from cutting/felling or uprooting any tree on the site in question on 2/08/2013. Besides these two applications,...
Tag this Judgment!