Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 42 of about 432 results (0.016 seconds)Amit Ahuja Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
#34 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1507/2014 & CM APPL. 3144/2014 AMIT AHUJA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans with Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through ..... Respondents Ms. Shyel Trehan, Advocate and Amicus Curiae with Ms. Tejaswi Shetty and Mr. Nishant Gokhale, Advocates Mr. Anand Grover, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Lorraine Misquith, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Ms.Geetanjali Sharma and Mr. Apurba Kundu, Advocates. Mr.Joginder Sukhija, CGSC for UOI. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for GNCTD. % Date of Decision :1. t April, 2014 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to treat the petitioner with utmost sincerity and care as well as to provide him treatment for haemophilia on regular basis.2. In the petition, it is stated that though the petitioner is suffering from haemophilia for which treatment...
Tag this Judgment!Ex.Hav.Sarbjit Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : March 18, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : April 01, 2014 W.P.(C) 4003/1998 EX.HAV.SARBJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Bahar U.Barqi, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Advocate with Ms.Ritu Yadav, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Pithily stated, the factual matrix of the above captioned writ petition is that in the year 1983 the petitioner was appointed to the post of Constable (Driver) in Central Industrial Security Force and earned promotion to the post of Head Constable (Driver) in due course of time.2. In the year 1987 the petitioner was posted to the CISF Unit at Paradip Port Trust, Paradip, Cuttack, Orissa. It is the case of the respondents that complaints were received against the petitioner o having committed various acts of indiscipline on December 03, 1987, in that, he remained ab...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Chander Kanta Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
#50 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1754/2013 & CM APPL. 3728/2014 SMT. CHANDER KANTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. O.P. Bhadani, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Sonia Arora with Ms. Pallavi Shali, Advocates Date of Decision :1. t April, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Petitioner who is a widow of the original allottee challenges respondent's direction to execute licence deed dated 24th December, 2012 on the ground that her physically handicapped husband was a permanent licence holder.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that as petitioner has been in occupation of the PCO booth for more than three decades, respondents without having a rehabilitation policy for such kiosk owners cannot today ask the petitioner who is a widow and now in her late forties, to vacate the kiosk.3. Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that the Government of NCT of Delhi cannot today auc...
Tag this Judgment!Dinesh Mittal and ors. Vs. Triveni Infrastructure Development Company ...
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h March, 2013 Date of decision:1. t April, 2014 % + CO. APPL. No.256/2013 (Also numbered as CO. APPL. No.240/2013) IN CO. PET. No.39/2009 DINESH MITTAL & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay S. Chhabra, Advocate for ex-director. versus TRIVENI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Makhija, Advocate for OL. Mr. P. Nagesh, Advocate for applicant. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR R. V. EASWAR, J.: CO. APPL. No.256/2013 (also numbered as CO. APPL. No.240/2013) 1. This is an application filed by M/s. Sanchar Nest Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd., which is a registered society bearing registration No.4302 of 22.07.2009 for carrying out the objective of identifying and constructing flats for its members, who are serving and retired employees of the CO. APPL. No.256/2013 (also numbered as CO. APPL. No.240/2013) Government of India and the public sector undertaking including BSNL. The following...
Tag this Judgment!Naushad Alam Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:01. 04.2014 + NAUSHAD ALAM Crl. Appeal 1364/2010 Through: .Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. Versus STATE Through: .Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The case of the prosecution in nutshell is as follows. On 23.7.2009, four police officials, namely, S.I. Jagmal Singh, ASI Rajesh Tyagi, Head Constable Davis and Constable Chandra Bhan while on patrolling reached near North Yard Bridge at about 3.10 pm, when they noticed a person coming from the side of Platform No.12 with a polythene bag in his hand. On seeing the police officials, he stood back for a while and then turned back at a fast pace. On suspicion, he was apprehended by the police officials. On search of the polythene which he was carrying in his hand, it was found to contain two brown colour packets kept in polythene. A black colour substance in the shape of sticks/bars was found in those packets. On smel...
Tag this Judgment!Naresh Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :26. h MARCH, 2014 DECIDED ON :1. t APRIL, 2014 + CRL.A.867/2012 & CRL.M.B.No.453/2014 NARESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.A.K.Chadha, Advocate. Versus STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Naresh (the appellant) challenges his conviction under Sections 392/34 IPC recorded by a judgment dated 18.05.2012 in Sessions Case No.268/10 arising out of FIR No.266/07 PS Uttam Nagar. By an order dated 25.05.2012, he was awarded RI for five years with fine ` 10,000/-. Allegations as projected in the charge-sheet were that on 28.03.2007 at about 11.00 P.M. near Aggarwal Sweets Shop, Balaji Chowk, Uttam Nagar, the appellant Naresh, driver of TSR No.DL1RD3218 with his associates Rajender Singh @ Monu and Vijay robbed complainant Rakesh of cash ` 250/- and mobile phone at knife point. During the course of investigation, statements of the witnesses conversant with the...
Tag this Judgment!Mahesh Kumar Vs. M/S. Fruit and Vegetable Projects Through Its Cmd
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on April 01 , 2014 + W.P.(C) 2054/2014 MAHESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K.Anand, Advocate versus M/S. FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PROJECTS THROUGH ITS CMD ......Respondent Represented by: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the award dated May 15, 2008 passed by the Industrial Tribunal in I.D. No.05/2001 whereby the Industrial Tribunal has held that the action of the respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner is legal and justified, and also to the order dated May 02, 2013 of the Industrial Tribunal whereby it has refused to review the award passed on May 15, 2008, a reference of which has already been given above.2. It was the case of the petitioner before the Industrial Tribunal that he was appointed by the respondent as casual worker on temporary basis initially for a period from October 17, 1995 to January 16, 1996, which appoin...
Tag this Judgment!Mukhtiyar Ahmed Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t April, 2014 + CRL.A.433/1999 MOHD. SHAHID Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Advocate versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP CRL.A.456/1999 MUKHTIYAR AHMED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Arun Srivastava, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Appellant Mohd. Shahid and Mukhtiyar Ahmed have filed separate appeals bearing No.Crl.A.433/1999 and Crl.A.456/1999 challenging the common judgment and order on sentence dated 2nd August, 1999 and 4th August, 1999 respectively passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.124/97 arising out of FIR No.288/97, PS Kamla Market whereby the appellants were convicted under Section 302/34 IPC as well as under Section 27 and 25 of Arms Act and were sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and fine of ...
Tag this Judgment!Suraj Vs. Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h March, 2014 DECIDED ON :1. t April, 2014 + CRL.A. 1357/2011 SURAJ Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Shekh Israr Ahmad, Advocate. Versus NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Suraj (the appellant) impugns a judgment dated 17.02.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in case FIR No.277/09 registered at Police Station H.N.Din by which he was convicted under Section 326 IPC. By an order on sentence dated 19.02.2011, he was awarded RI for five years with fine `10,000/-.2. Prosecution case, as revealed in the charge-sheet, was that on 04.07.2009 at about 06.30 p.m. in front of House No.210, Near Qureshi Masjid, Basti Hazrat Nizamuddin, the appellant-Suraj voluntarily caused dangerous injuries to Sobha Rani, Prem Wati, Ritu and Thakur Singh by throwing acid on them with an intention to commit murder. The victims were medically examined. The Investigating Officer lod...
Tag this Judgment!Rahul and ors. Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 121/2010 RAHUL & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr M.L. Yadav, Adv. versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.On 06.07.2007, Police Station Mayur Vihar was informed of a quarrel at Chinda Village. The information was recorded vide DD No.16A and a copy of the said DD was handed over to ASI Jai Pal for investigation. When the aforesaid police officer reached village Chinda, opposite Upkar Apartments, he came to know that the injured had been taken to LBS Hospital. No eye-witness met him on the spot. When he reached LBS Hospital, the eye-witness Narinder Singh was found present there and the statement of the said witness was recorded by him. Narinder Singh told the police officer that on the previous day, a person namely Rahul had quarrelled with his father after taking liquor. He further stated that on 06.07.2007, when h...
Tag this Judgment!