Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 16 of about 1,089 results (0.023 seconds)Smt Sheila Khatri and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 1786/1999 SMT SHEILA KHATRI & OTHERS ... Petitioners ... Respondents versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioners : Mr Sumit Bansal with Mr Ateev Mathur and Ms Richa Oberoi For the Respondents 1 & 3 : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi. For the Respondent 2/DDA : Ms Shobhna Takiar. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under...
Tag this Judgment!Novateur Electric and Digital Systems Private Limite Vs. Indo Simon El ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:22. d December, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.3949/2014 NOVATEUR ELECTRIC & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Adv. with Mr. Ranjan Negi, Ms. Pallavi Rao, Ms. Apoorva Murli and Mr. Namit Suri, Advs. versus INDO SIMON ELECTRIC PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Vinod Khurana and Mr. Mohinder Vig, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A. No.25762/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiffs under Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing certain documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to said documents being produced at the time of admission/denial of the documents. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.25763/2014 (U/s 65A & B of the Evidence Act, 1872) Heard. Allowed subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.25764/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Learned Senior counsel for...
Tag this Judgment!Gurnam Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 22, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.3570/2013 GURNAM SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Puneet Khurana, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Saquib, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J1 The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for fixation of his seniority on the post of Assistant Commandant in SC category from the date of his selection along with his batchmates of Batch No.26 and not with AC/DE at Sr. No.29.2. The case of the petitioner in brief is that he was selected for appointment to the post of Assistant Commandant (Direct Entry) in BSF through SSB CPOs AC Examination, 1999 and had successfully undergone the written examination, physical efficiency test and interview conducted by the Special Selection Board and was declared successful for appointment to the s...
Tag this Judgment!Surinder Kumar Vs. Ranjit Singh, Mla and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:22. d December, 2014 % EL.PET. No.5/2014 + SURINDER KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. R.V.Naik, Adv. with Mr. S.K. Tandon, Adv. versus RANJIT SINGH, MLA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. U.B.N. Singh, Adv. with Mr. Umesh Sinha, Ms. Priyanka and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This election petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that election of respondent No.1 is null and void, thereby setting aside the election result dated 8th December, 2013 to the Assembly Constituency 68, Gokulpur Delhi (NCT Delhi) (hereinafter referred to as the "Gokulpur Constituency"), constituency reserved for schedule caste whereby respondent No.1 was elected and a declaration that the petitioner is the elected member from Gokulpur Constituency, who contested the said election dated 4th December, 2013 as an independent candidate.2. Brief facts of the presen...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Jagdish Singh Vs. Jasvinder Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:22. d December, 2014 % + I.A. No.14828/2009, I.A. No.648/2010,I.A. No.806/2010, I.A. No.825/2010 & I.A. No.1888/2010 in CS(OS) 2184/2009 SH.JAGDISH SINGH Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pranay Agrawala, Adv. versus JASVINDER SINGH & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Aviral Tiwari, Adv. for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff filed the suit for declaration and injunction against the defendants seeking the following prayers:(i) Pass a decree of declaration declaring that the order dated 24.04.2007 passed in I.A. No.4651/2007 filed in CS(OS) No.2066/2006 and recording the compromise between the Defendant No.2 and Defendant Nos.4 and 5 was illegal and thus null and without any authority and void under Indian Contract Act, 1872; and (ii) Pass a decree of declaration that the Defendant Nos.1 and 2 and Late Kunwarni Padmini Shah has no right, title and/or interest in...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Pant Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h October, 2014 Date of Decision:22. d December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 4178/2012 MANOJ PANT Through: .Petitioner Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhay Mani Tripathi, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR. Through: .Respondents Mr. Yogesh Verma, APP for the State. Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The petitioner by filing the present petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) has assailed the order dated 13.09.2012 passed by learned District Judge & Additional Sessions Judge (East), Incharge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed. Vide order dated 06.08.2011 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate-06 (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi the petitioner along with other coaccused persons was summoned for the offences under Sections 352/356/379 of Indian Penal Code (IPC...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax-Vi Vs. Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~26, 27 & 30 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA7872014 Date of decision:22. d December, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Amir Aziz and Mr. Shashank Menon, Advocates. versus TUPPERWARE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate. ITA7882014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Amir Aziz and Mr. Shashank Menon, Advocates. versus TUPPERWARE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate. ITA7912014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Amir Aziz and Mr. Shashank Menon, Advocates. versus TUPPERWARE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) One common issue arises in these appeals by the Revenue whic...
Tag this Judgment!Sh.Rakesh Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs. Smt. Shashi Prabha Sharma and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. No.43 /2009 & CM39562009(stay) 22nd December, 2014 % SH.RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. Through: None. ......Petitioners VERSUS SMT. SHASHI PRABHA SHARMA & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinay Kr. Garg, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. On the last date i.e. 17.12.2014, the following order was passed:Lawyers are abstaining from work. This case was argued in detail on 15.12.2014, and though it is not recorded in the order, there was a possibility of compromise in case petitioners wanted certain additional amount, and which was without prejudice to the respective rights and contentions. List 22nd December, 2014. 2. No one appears for the petitioners in spite of the matter being passed over.3. The present petition impugns the judgment of the first appellate court dated 10.12.2008 by which the first appellate court dismissed the appeal, against the order of ...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India Vs. Vakul Vardhan Gautam
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. 10.2014 Pronounced on :22. 12.2014 + W.P.(C) 7449/2011, C.M. NO.16888/2014 (for stay) UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Petitioner Sh. H.K. Gangwani, Advocate. versus VAKUL VARDHAN GAUTAM Through: .... Respondent Ms. Shikha Sapra and Sh. Tushar Joshi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. In this writ proceeding under Article 226 of Indian Constitution, the petitioner, Union of India (here after the UOI) challenges an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 03.03.2011. By that order, the CAT set aside the charge sheet issued against the respondent (hereafter the applicant).2. In 1982, the applicant joined the Central Revenues Control Laboratory and thereafter, he was serving in the Small Scale Service Institution and Patent, Design and Trademark Department. On 31.10.1993 he joined the services of the petitioner as a direct recruit...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Harig India Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA No.141/2002 Reserved on:19. h September, 2014 Date of Decision:22. d December, 2014 % Commissioner of Income Tax ...Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel Versus M/s Harig India Limited Respondent Through Nemo. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.The present appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) was admitted for hearing on 20th July, 2006, on the following substantial question of law:Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that manufacture of gold jewellery on job work basis amounts to manufacturing activity by the assessee entitling it to deductions under Section 80HHC(3)(a) of the Income Tax Act?.2. The appeal relates to the assessment year 1998-99 and impugns the findings recorded against the Revenue by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in their order dated 5 th Nove...
Tag this Judgment!