Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 15 of about 1,089 results (0.010 seconds)Radhey Shyam Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RESERVED ON:23. 09.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2014 CRL.A. 1111/2013 RADHEY SHYAM versus STATE CRL.A. 119/2014 JAIPAL SINGH ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Appearance: Mr. R.M. Tufail with Mr. Anwar. A. Khan, Mr.Abdul Faroor and Mr. Vishal Raj, Advocates for appellant in Crl.A.1111/2013. Ms. Nandita Rao, Advocate for appellant in Crl.A.119/2014 with Inspr. Jorawar Singh, PS Prashant Vihar. Sh. Vinod Diwakar, Advocate for State in both the appeals. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. These appeals by accused are directed against a judgment convicting them for the offences under Section 302/392/411/34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act rendered in SC No.181/2009 on 24.05.2013 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. They also appeal against the sentence of life imprisonment and other prison terms, as well as fine imposed on them by ...
Tag this Judgment!Executive Engineer Cd-Ii Vs. M/S J.K. Engineers
Court: Delhi
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 1637/2014 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CD-II ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Madan, Adv. versus M/S J.K. ENGINEERS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER % 22.12.2014 IA No.25937/2014 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. O.M.P. 1637/2014 & IA No.25938/2014 (u/S151CPC for condonation of delay of 86 days in filing the petition) & IA No.25936/214 (u/S151CPC for stay) 1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) accompanied by an application for condonation of delay. As per averments made in the application, there is a delay of 86 days.2. The challenge in the petition is made with regard to the three claims. The first claim is, in fact, a sub-claim, which bears the description: No.1.04. The other claim, which is challenged, is claim No.3, and the last claim, which is under challenge, is claim No.6.3. Insofar as s...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax-Xiii Vs. Hitesh Bansal
Court: Delhi
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA8012014 Date of decision:22. d December, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XIII ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Amir Aziz and Mr. Shashank Menon, Advocates. versus HITESH BANSAL Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This appeal by the Revenue pertains to assessment year 2008-09 and impugns order dated 9th May, 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short).2. Learned counsel for the Revenue has relied upon decision of the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax versus Dalip Chand and Sons (2008) 301 ITR276(HP). In the said decision, it has been held that even prior to the amendment of Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) with effect from 1 st April, 2009, effect should be given to the said provision by aggregating the total cash payments towar...
Tag this Judgment!Angle Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S Capital Builders and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:22. 12.2014 + OMP14932014 ANGLE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Versus M/S CAPITAL BUILDERS & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms Bina Gupta & Mr Abhay Anand, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr Atul Sharma & Mr Hilanka Chaudhury, Advs. For respondent no.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act). By this petition interim directions are sought vis-a-vis respondent no.1. Briefly, the interim directions which the petitioner seeks, pertain to the Development Rights Agreement dated 05.06.2012 (hereafter referred to as the DRA), executed as between the parties herein and a Full and Final Settlement agreement dated 29.10.2013, executed between the petitioner and respondent no.1, which is a proprietorship concern of, one, Sh. ...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Choudhary Vs. Union Public Service Commission
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:22. 12.2014 + W.P. (C) 8944/2014 RAMESH CHOUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani with Mr. Deepak Goel and Mr. Sunando Raha, Advocates. versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate accepts notice. With consent of counsel, the matter was heard finally.2. The petitioner challenges an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) dated 5.11.2014 in OA42592013. The Original Application preferred by the present petitioner seeking a relief that the order debarring him from participating in Civil Services Examination for ten years issued by the UPSC, and cancelling his candidature for the Engineering Services Examination 2012, be set aside, was rejected.3. The brief facts are that the petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!Deepti Abrol Vs. The Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9183/2014 and CM APPL. 20882/2014 Decided on:22. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: DEEPTI ABROL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Goel, Advocate versus THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, Advocate for R-1 to R-3/DOE with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Legal Assistant, Zone-1. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was working on the post of TGT with the respondents No.5 and 6/School from 18.04.1994 till 31.03.2008, praying inter alia that the respondents No.5 and 6/School be called upon to revise her pay scale and release the arrears of pay to her in terms of the Sixth Pay Commission till the date her resignation was accepted, alongwith interest and further, to pay her gratuity, travel allowance and bonus etc. from the date of her employment, till 25.03.2008.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that while releasing the terminal...
Tag this Judgment!Virender Kumar Vs. The Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9218/2014 and CM APPL. 20948/2014 Decided on:22. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: VIRENDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Goel, Advocate versus THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, Advocate for R-1 to R-3/DOE with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Legal Assistant, Zone-1. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was working on the post of TGT with the respondents No.5 and 6/School from 20.9.1988 till 16.8.2003 and from 1.4.2004 till 24.3.2006, praying inter alia that the respondents No.5 and 6/School be called upon to revise his pay scale and release the arrears of pay to him in terms of the Sixth Pay Commission till the date of termination, alongwith interest and further, to pay him gratuity, travel allowance and bonus etc. from the period of his employment.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that while releasing the term...
Tag this Judgment!Ex. Const. Satbir Singh and Anr. Vs. National Capital Territory of Del ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 12.2014 Pronounced on:22. 12.2014 + WP(C) No.196/2003 .Petitioners Ex. Const. Satbir Singh & Anr. Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. Versus National Capital Territory of Delhi. Respondent Through : Ms. Zubeda Begum, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. In this writ petition, the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 8.11.2002 dismissing O.A. No.3375/2001 has been questioned. The CAT upheld the punishment of dismissal imposed upon the petitioners after a Departmental Enquiry.2. The brief facts are that the petitioners were enrolled as Constables in the Delhi Police at different times in 1984 and 1986. On 14.01.91, a First Information Report (FIR) was lodged against them (FIR No.19/91). According to the allegations in the FIR, on the night WP(C) No.196/2003 Page 1 of 13/14.01.91, the petitioners (who at that time, were posted at the Bad...
Tag this Judgment!Rajeev Jain and Anr Vs. Aarav Agrotech Pvt Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:22. d December, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.2634/2014 & I.A. Nos.23469/2014 & 23470/2014 RAJEEV JAIN & ANR Through .....Plaintiffs Mr.Anand Maheshwari, Adv. with Mr.Navin Gupta, Adv. versus AARAV AGROTECH PVT LTD & ANR ..Defendants Through Mr.Puneet Bhalla, Adv. with Ms.Chetna Bhalla, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for possession, recovery of rent and damages for use and occupation of property bearing Flat No.207, situated on the second floor of Mercantile House, 15, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi and parking space No.LB-9, situated at Lower Basement of Mercantile House, 15, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit properties) against the defendants.2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs are the joint owners of the suit properties, having purchased the same from M/s New Delhi Hotels Limited. The defendants approached the plai...
Tag this Judgment!Creative Width Design Solutions Vs. Print Adda and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:22. d December, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.3974/2014 CREATIVE WIDTH DESIGN SOLUTIONS ..... Plaintiff Through Ms.Pratibha M. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nishant Nigam, Ms.Anusuya Nigam and Mr.Varun, Advocates versus PRINT ADDA & ORS Through ..... Defendants None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A. No.25962/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing original documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to original documents being produced at the time of admission/denial of the documents. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.25963/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing dim documents with insufficient left side margin. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to the same being produced at the time of admiss...
Tag this Judgment!