Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 12 of about 1,089 results (0.018 seconds)Punam Laul and Anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ 29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6947/2014 & CM163572014 PUNAM LAUL & ANR .... Petitioners versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1&2 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr B.S. Maan with Mr Vishal Maan : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Manu Mridul with Mr Rajat Agnihotri & Ms Ragini. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter affidavit handed over on behalf of respondent nos. 1&2 by Mr Yeeshu Jain is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit in view of the averments contained in the writ petition.2. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 201...
Tag this Judgment!Arn Infrastructure India Ltd. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 + CRL.M.C. 1396/2013 ARN INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the petitioner assails order dated 30.01.2013 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka District Court, Delhi whereby the petitioner has been summoned for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act, for short).2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the facts of the case are that respondent No.2 herein filed a complaint under Section 138 of NI Act against the petitioner on the allegations, inter alia, that the complainant had booked unit/ shop of 410 sq. ft. in the project Globus Residency launched by the p...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ii Vs. Home Developers Pvt.Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA8032014 Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) II ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus HOME DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD. Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This appeal filed by the Revenue pertains to assessment year 2004-05 and impugns the findings recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in their order dated 21 st September, 2012.2. The appeal, it appears, was filed within time, but returned under office objection and there is a prolonged delay of 650 days in re-filing of the appeal. However, before issuing notice on the application for condonation of delay, we deem it appropriate to examine the grounds of appeal on merits.3. ITA8032014 were subject to search and seizure operations under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Kumar and Anr. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-218 & 218A + CRL.A. 1124 of 2010 AJAY KUMAR & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rakesh Dudeja and Mr. Raj Kumar Tomar, Advocates for A-1 Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Amicus Curiae for A-2 versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP WITH CRL.A. 71 of 2012 STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP versus BANTI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Amicus Curiae for R-1. Mr. Rakesh Dudeja and Mr. Raj Kumar Tomar, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER2312.2014 1. Criminal Appeal (Crl. A.) No.1124 of 2010 is by Ajay Kumar (Appellant No.1) (Accused No.2) and Banti (Appellant No.2) (Accused No.1) against the judgment dated 28th July 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in SC No.139 of 2007 convicting both the Appellants for the offences under Sections 323/341 and 363/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 4th August 2010...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Alias Pandya Vs. State
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1259 of 2014 Reserved on:19. h December 2014 Decision on:23. d December 2014 AMIT alias PANDYA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP with S.I. Mukesh Kumar, P.S. Civil Lines. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2312.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 25th July, 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in S.C. No.136/11 convicting the Appellant for the offences under Section 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (Arms Act) and the order on sentence dated 31st July 2014, sentencing him to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) and fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo six months simple imprisonment (SI) for the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act and 7 years RI and fine of Rs. 30,000/- and in default to undergo SI for six months for the offence under Section 307 IPC. Both the sentences were directe...
Tag this Judgment!Rohtash Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 % + CRL.M.C. 2182/2014 ROHTASH Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State with SI Balbeer Singh, P.S.Shahdara. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition filed under Section 482 read with Section 427 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the petitioner seeks the sentences in case FIR No.194/2004 under Sections 392/394/397/411/34 IPC and FIR No.65/2009 under Sections 308/379/324/34 IPC both registered at P.S. Shahdara, Delhi to run concurrently.2. The concise facts of the present case are that the petitioner was convicted in case FIR No.65/2009 under Sections 324 and 325 read with Section 34 IPC by learned District Judge-cum-Additional Sessions Judge, In-charge, North East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi vide judgment dated 19.05.2012 ...
Tag this Judgment!Vincent George Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September, 2014 Date of Decision:23. d December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 3371/2013 VINCENT GEORGE Through: .Petitioner Mr. Guru Krishan Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. Sudhindere and Mr. Abhishek Prasad, Advocates. versus CBI Through: .Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Special PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Utkarsha Kohli, Advocates with IO Inspector Sushil Diwan. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 18.07.2013 and 19.07.2013 passed by learned Special Judge, CBI-03 (PC Act), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi in CC No.01/2013 arising out of RC No.4/2001/CBI/SIU-IX (EOU-VII/ New Delhi) titled as CBI vs. Vincent George whereby the petitioner was summoned for the offence punishable under Sections 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the facts of the case are that on 14.03.2000 on the basis o...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Tara Logitech Private Ltd. Vs. M/S Religare Finvest Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d December, 2014. + OMP No.1656/2014 & IA No.26202/2014 (for stay) M/S TARA LOGITECH PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Nanda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Mr. Rajat & Mr. Priyadarshi Gopal, Advs. Versus M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None. AND + OMP No.1657/2014 & IA No.26204/2014 (for stay) M/S TARA LOGITECH PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Nanda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Mr. Rajat & Mr. Priyadarshi Gopal, Advs. Versus M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Respondent I.A. No.26203/2014 in OMP No.1656/2014 & I.A. No.26205/2014 in OMP No.1657/2014 (both for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The applications are disposed of. OMP Nos.1656/2014 & 1657/2014 3. Both these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are preferred with respect to the a...
Tag this Judgment!the Commissioner of Income Tax-Ii Vs. M/S Johnson Matthey India P. Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.757/2014 Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan & Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocates. versus M/S JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vikas Srivastava & Ms. Varsha Bhattacharya, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): CM No.20423/2014 Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-assessee on advance notice states that he has no objection in case delay in re-filing of 395 days is condoned. The application is allowed in view of the said statement. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.757/2014 This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) impugns order dated 31st August, 2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) affirming the finding of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that the Assessing Officer was not justifi...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Arjuman Farms and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and O ...
Court: Delhi
$~ 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6619/2014 & CM157392014 M/S ARJUMAN FARMS & RESORTS PVT. LTD. .... Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent Nos.1&2 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr B.S. Maan with Mr Vishal Maan : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Singh : Mr dhanesh Relan with Mr Arush Bhandari CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The learned counsel for respondent nos. 1&2 has handed over the counter affidavit on their behalf. The same is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file the rejoinder affidavit and would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2...
Tag this Judgment!