Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 17 of about 1,089 results (0.023 seconds)Balraj Singh Malik Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d December, 2014. + W.P.(C) No.8302/2014 & CM No.19254/2014 (for stay) BALRAJ SINGH MALIK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns Rule 102(2) of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Rules, 2007 (Rules) framed under the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (the Act) to the extent it enables the General Body of the Co-operative Group Housing Society to fix higher charges of essential services in respect of dwelling units which are on rent and in possession of tenants, on the ground of being ultra vires Sections 76, 89 and 93 read with Section 137(2) and other provisions of the Act and Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Axiomatica...
Tag this Judgment!Radhey Shyam Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RESERVED ON:23. 09.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2014 CRL.A. 1111/2013 RADHEY SHYAM versus STATE CRL.A. 119/2014 JAIPAL SINGH ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Appearance: Mr. R.M. Tufail with Mr. Anwar. A. Khan, Mr.Abdul Faroor and Mr. Vishal Raj, Advocates for appellant in Crl.A.1111/2013. Ms. Nandita Rao, Advocate for appellant in Crl.A.119/2014 with Inspr. Jorawar Singh, PS Prashant Vihar. Sh. Vinod Diwakar, Advocate for State in both the appeals. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. These appeals by accused are directed against a judgment convicting them for the offences under Section 302/392/411/34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act rendered in SC No.181/2009 on 24.05.2013 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. They also appeal against the sentence of life imprisonment and other prison terms, as well as fine imposed on them by ...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax-Vi Vs. Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~26, 27 & 30 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA7872014 Date of decision:22. d December, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Amir Aziz and Mr. Shashank Menon, Advocates. versus TUPPERWARE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate. ITA7882014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Amir Aziz and Mr. Shashank Menon, Advocates. versus TUPPERWARE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate. ITA7912014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Amir Aziz and Mr. Shashank Menon, Advocates. versus TUPPERWARE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) One common issue arises in these appeals by the Revenue whic...
Tag this Judgment!Sh.Rakesh Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs. Smt. Shashi Prabha Sharma and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. No.43 /2009 & CM39562009(stay) 22nd December, 2014 % SH.RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. Through: None. ......Petitioners VERSUS SMT. SHASHI PRABHA SHARMA & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinay Kr. Garg, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. On the last date i.e. 17.12.2014, the following order was passed:Lawyers are abstaining from work. This case was argued in detail on 15.12.2014, and though it is not recorded in the order, there was a possibility of compromise in case petitioners wanted certain additional amount, and which was without prejudice to the respective rights and contentions. List 22nd December, 2014. 2. No one appears for the petitioners in spite of the matter being passed over.3. The present petition impugns the judgment of the first appellate court dated 10.12.2008 by which the first appellate court dismissed the appeal, against the order of ...
Tag this Judgment!Gurnam Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 22, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.3570/2013 GURNAM SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Puneet Khurana, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Saquib, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J1 The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for fixation of his seniority on the post of Assistant Commandant in SC category from the date of his selection along with his batchmates of Batch No.26 and not with AC/DE at Sr. No.29.2. The case of the petitioner in brief is that he was selected for appointment to the post of Assistant Commandant (Direct Entry) in BSF through SSB CPOs AC Examination, 1999 and had successfully undergone the written examination, physical efficiency test and interview conducted by the Special Selection Board and was declared successful for appointment to the s...
Tag this Judgment!Rajeev Jain and Anr Vs. Aarav Agrotech Pvt Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:22. d December, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.2634/2014 & I.A. Nos.23469/2014 & 23470/2014 RAJEEV JAIN & ANR Through .....Plaintiffs Mr.Anand Maheshwari, Adv. with Mr.Navin Gupta, Adv. versus AARAV AGROTECH PVT LTD & ANR ..Defendants Through Mr.Puneet Bhalla, Adv. with Ms.Chetna Bhalla, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for possession, recovery of rent and damages for use and occupation of property bearing Flat No.207, situated on the second floor of Mercantile House, 15, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi and parking space No.LB-9, situated at Lower Basement of Mercantile House, 15, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit properties) against the defendants.2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs are the joint owners of the suit properties, having purchased the same from M/s New Delhi Hotels Limited. The defendants approached the plai...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Pant Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h October, 2014 Date of Decision:22. d December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 4178/2012 MANOJ PANT Through: .Petitioner Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhay Mani Tripathi, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR. Through: .Respondents Mr. Yogesh Verma, APP for the State. Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The petitioner by filing the present petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) has assailed the order dated 13.09.2012 passed by learned District Judge & Additional Sessions Judge (East), Incharge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed. Vide order dated 06.08.2011 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate-06 (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi the petitioner along with other coaccused persons was summoned for the offences under Sections 352/356/379 of Indian Penal Code (IPC...
Tag this Judgment!the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi ???Iv Vs. Shiv Raj Gupta
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No.41/2002 Reserved on:21. t August, 2014 Date of Decision:22. d December, 2014 % The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi IV ... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Advocate with Mr. Akash Vajpai and Mr. P. Roychaudhury, Advocates. Versus Shiv Raj Gupta Through ... Respondent Mr. Anoop Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.The Revenue in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short), pertaining to assessment year 1995-96, impugns the majority decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in ITA No.4898/Del/98. The present appeal was admitted for hearing on 25th April, 2005, on the following substantial question of law:Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the amount of Rs. 6.6 crores received by the assessee from SWC is on account of handing over management and control of CDBI* (which were earlier ...
Tag this Judgment!De Nora India Limited (Earlier Known as M/S Titano Vs. Cit and Another
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on August 28, 2014 Judgment delivered on December 22, 2014 + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.190/2002 DE NORA INDIA LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S TITANOR COMPONENTS LTD.) ..... Appellant Through Mr. C.S. Jain and Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Advocates. versus CIT AND ANOTHER Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel & Ms. Swati Thapa, Advocates. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.191/2002 DE NORA INDIA LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S TITANOR COMPONENTS LTD.) ..... Appellant Through Mr. C.S. Jain and Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Advocates. versus CIT AND ANOTHER Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel & Ms. Swati Thapa, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. These two appeals filed by the assessee DENORA India Ltd. (earlier known as M/s Titanor Components Ltd.) under Section 260A of the Income Tax ITA No.190 & 191/2002 Pa ge 1 of 15 Act, 1961 (Act i...
Tag this Judgment!Creative Width Design Solutions Vs. Print Adda and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:22. d December, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.3974/2014 CREATIVE WIDTH DESIGN SOLUTIONS ..... Plaintiff Through Ms.Pratibha M. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nishant Nigam, Ms.Anusuya Nigam and Mr.Varun, Advocates versus PRINT ADDA & ORS Through ..... Defendants None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A. No.25962/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing original documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to original documents being produced at the time of admission/denial of the documents. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.25963/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing dim documents with insufficient left side margin. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to the same being produced at the time of admiss...
Tag this Judgment!